All Publications


  • Illumination discrimination in the absence of a fixed surface-reflectance layout JOURNAL OF VISION Radonjic, A., Ding, X., Krieger, A., Aston, S., Hurlbert, A. C., Brainard, D. H. 2018; 18 (5)

    View details for DOI 10.1167/18.5.11

    View details for Web of Science ID 000432664100005

  • Illumination discrimination in the absence of a fixed surface-reflectance layout. Journal of vision Radonjic, A. n., Ding, X. n., Krieger, A. n., Aston, S. n., Hurlbert, A. C., Brainard, D. H. 2018; 18 (5): 11

    Abstract

    Previous studies have shown that humans can discriminate spectral changes in illumination and that this sensitivity depends both on the chromatic direction of the illumination change and on the ensemble of surfaces in the scene. These studies, however, always used stimulus scenes with a fixed surface-reflectance layout. Here we compared illumination discrimination for scenes in which the surface reflectance layout remains fixed (fixed-surfaces condition) to those in which surface reflectances were shuffled randomly across scenes, but with the mean scene reflectance held approximately constant (shuffled-surfaces condition). Illumination discrimination thresholds in the fixed-surfaces condition were commensurate with previous reports. Thresholds in the shuffled-surfaces condition, however, were considerably elevated. Nonetheless, performance in the shuffled-surfaces condition exceeded that attainable through random guessing. Analysis of eye fixations revealed that in the fixed-surfaces condition, low illumination discrimination thresholds (across observers) were predicted by low overall fixation spread and high consistency of fixation location and fixated surface reflectances across trial intervals. Performance in the shuffled-surfaces condition was not systematically related to any of the eye-fixation characteristics we examined for that condition, but was correlated with performance in the fixed-surfaces condition.

    View details for PubMedID 29904786

    View details for PubMedCentralID PMC5962298

  • Illumination discrimination in real and simulated scenes JOURNAL OF VISION Radonjic, A., Pearce, B., Aston, S., Krieger, A., Dubin, H., Cottaris, N. P., Brainard, D. H., Hurlbert, A. C. 2016; 16 (11): 2

    Abstract

    Characterizing humans' ability to discriminate changes in illumination provides information about the visual system's representation of the distal stimulus. We have previously shown that humans are able to discriminate illumination changes and that sensitivity to such changes depends on their chromatic direction. Probing illumination discrimination further would be facilitated by the use of computer-graphics simulations, which would, in practice, enable a wider range of stimulus manipulations. There is no a priori guarantee, however, that results obtained with simulated scenes generalize to real illuminated scenes. To investigate this question, we measured illumination discrimination in real and simulated scenes that were well-matched in mean chromaticity and scene geometry. Illumination discrimination thresholds were essentially identical for the two stimulus types. As in our previous work, these thresholds varied with illumination change direction. We exploited the flexibility offered by the use of graphics simulations to investigate whether the differences across direction are preserved when the surfaces in the scene are varied. We show that varying the scene's surface ensemble in a manner that also changes mean scene chromaticity modulates the relative sensitivity to illumination changes along different chromatic directions. Thus, any characterization of sensitivity to changes in illumination must be defined relative to the set of surfaces in the scene.

    View details for DOI 10.1167/16.11.2

    View details for Web of Science ID 000385756900002

    View details for PubMedID 28558392

    View details for PubMedCentralID PMC5024666