Linking Hypothesis and Number of Response Options Modulate Inferred Scalar Implicature Rate.
Frontiers in psychology
2019; 10: 189
The past 15 years have seen increasing experimental investigations of core pragmatic questions in the ever more active and lively field of experimental pragmatics. Within experimental pragmatics, many of the core questions have relied on the operationalization of the theoretical notion of "implicature rate." Implicature rate based results have informed the work on acquisition, online processing, and scalar diversity, inter alia. Implicature rate has typically been quantified as the proportion of "pragmatic" judgments in two-alternative forced choice truth value judgment tasks. Despite its theoretical importance, this linking hypothesis from implicature rate to behavioral responses has never been extensively tested. Here we show that two factors dramatically affect the "implicature rate" inferred from truth value judgment tasks: (a) the number of responses provided to participants; and (b) the linking hypothesis about what constitutes a "pragmatic" judgment. We argue that it is time for the field of experimental pragmatics to engage more seriously with its foundational assumptions about how theoretical notions map onto behaviorally measurable quantities, and present a sketch of an alternative linking hypothesis that derives behavior in truth value judgment tasks from probabilistic utterance expectations.
View details for DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00189
View details for PubMedID 30809167
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC6379463
- Linking Hypothesis and Number of Response Options Modulate Inferred Scalar Implicature Rate FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY 2019; 10