Bio


Research Interests: Pastoralism, Health and Conflict, Humanitarian Response
Regions: Ethiopia, South Sudan

Hannah Wild is an MD Candidate at Stanford University School of Medicine. Her research focuses on the health of nomadic populations and more broadly, the intersection of health, armed conflict, and culture in Sub-Saharan Africa. She received her undergraduate degree in Comparative Literature from Harvard University with special fields in oral literature and ethnography. Prior to beginning medical school she received a post-graduate fellowship to conduct ethnographic fieldwork with the Nyangatom, a tribe of nomadic pastoralists in the Omo Valley of southwest Ethiopia. She spent 18 months living with the Nyangatom’s nomadic cattle camps and studying their traditional medical practices, and is fluent in the local language. She currently leads multi-institution research collaborations to develop methodology for including nomadic groups in population data and household surveys (https://news.stanford.edu/2019/11/27/hard-to-count-matter/). Her research on pastoralists' role in regional conflict dynamics was cited by the 2019 United Nations Report of the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan (https://undocs.org/A/HRC/40/CRP.1). Her work has received support from Stanford’s Center for Innovation in Global Health, Geospatial Center, and Center for African Studies, as well as the American Society for Tropical Medicine & Hygiene and Digital Globe Foundation.

Education & Certifications


  • Bachelor of Arts, Harvard University, Literature (2011)

All Publications


  • Making Pastoralists Count: Geospatial Methods for the Health Surveillance of Nomadic Populations. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene Wild, H., Glowacki, L., Maples, S., Mejia-Guevara, I., Krystosik, A., Bonds, M. H., Hiruy, A., LaBeaud, A. D., Barry, M. 2019

    Abstract

    Nomadic pastoralists are among the world's hardest-to-reach and least served populations. Pastoralist communities are difficult to capture in household surveys because of factors including their high degree of mobility over remote terrain, fluid domestic arrangements, and cultural barriers. Most surveys use census-based sampling frames which do not accurately capture the demographic and health parameters of nomadic populations. As a result, pastoralists are "invisible" in population data such as the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). By combining remote sensing and geospatial analysis, we developed a sampling strategy designed to capture the current distribution of nomadic populations. We then implemented this sampling frame to survey a population of mobile pastoralists in southwest Ethiopia, focusing on maternal and child health (MCH) indicators. Using standardized instruments from DHS questionnaires, we draw comparisons with regional and national data finding disparities with DHS data in core MCH indicators, including vaccination coverage, skilled birth attendance, and nutritional status. Our field validation demonstrates that this method is a logistically feasible alternative to conventional sampling frames and may be used at the population level. Geospatial sampling methods provide cost-affordable and logistically feasible strategies for sampling mobile populations, a crucial first step toward reaching these groups with health services.

    View details for DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.18-1009

    View details for PubMedID 31436151

  • “Lost Generation” in South Sudan: A Broader Approach Toward Peace Urgently Needed Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness Wild, H., Fallavier, P., Patel, R. 2019: 1-9

    View details for DOI 10.1017/dmp.2018.144

  • A Consensus Framework for the Humanitarian Surgical Response to Armed Conflict in 21st Century Warfare. JAMA surgery Wren, S. M., Wild, H. B., Gurney, J., Amirtharajah, M., Brown, Z. W., Bulger, E. M., Burkle, F. M., Elster, E. A., Forrester, J. D., Garber, K., Gosselin, R. A., Groen, R. S., Hsin, G., Joshipura, M., Kushner, A. L., Norton, I., Osmers, I., Pagano, H., Razek, T., Sáenz-Terrazas, J. M., Schussler, L., Stewart, B. T., Traboulsi, A. A., Trelles, M., Troke, J., VanFosson, C. A., Wise, P. H. 2019

    Abstract

    Armed conflict in the 21st century poses new challenges to a humanitarian surgical response, including changing security requirements, access to patients, and communities in need, limited deployable surgical assets, resource constraints, and the requirement to address both traumatic injuries as well as emergency surgical needs of the population. At the same time, recent improvements in trauma care and systems have reduced injury-related mortality. This combination of new challenges and medical capabilities warrants reconsideration of long-standing humanitarian surgery protocols.To describe a consensus framework for surgical care designed to respond to this emerging need.An international group of 35 representatives from humanitarian agencies, US military, and academic trauma programs was invited to the Stanford Humanitarian Surgical Response in Conflict Working Group to engage in a structured process to review extant trauma protocols and make recommendations for revision.The working group's method adapted core elements of a modified Delphi process combined with consensus development conference from August 3 to August 5, 2018.Lessons from civilian and military trauma systems as well as recent battlefield experiences in humanitarian settings were integrated into a tiered continuum of response from point of injury through rehabilitation. The framework addresses the security and medical requirements as well as ethical and legal principles that guide humanitarian action. The consensus framework includes trained, lay first responders; far-forward resuscitation/stabilization centers; rapid damage control surgical access; and definitive care facilities. The system also includes nontrauma surgical care, injury prevention, quality improvement, data collection, and predeployment training requirements.Evidence suggests that modern trauma systems save lives. However, the requirements of providing this standard of care in insecure conflict settings places new burdens on humanitarian systems that must provide both emergency and trauma surgical care. This consensus framework integrates advances in trauma care and surgical systems in response to a changing security environment. It is possible to reduce disparities and improve the standard of care in these settings.

    View details for DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4547

    View details for PubMedID 31722004

  • The militarization of cattle raiding in South Sudan: how a traditional practice became a tool for political violence Journal of International Humanitarian Action Wild, H., Jok, J. M., Patel, R. 2018; 3 (2)
  • On the Move in Cattle Country: Tracking Nomadic Pastoralists in Southwest Ethiopia. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene Wild, H. 2018; 99 (1): 9–10

    View details for PubMedID 29978779

  • To Do No Harm: Humanitarian Aid in Conflict Demands Political Engagement Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness Patel, R., Wild, H. 2018; 12 (5): 567-568

    View details for DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.133

  • MAKING PASTORALISTS COUNT: HEALTH SURVEILLANCE OF A NOMADIC POPULATION USING A GEOSPATIALLY DERIVED SAMPLING FRAME Wild, H., Glowacki, L., Maples, S., Mejia-Guevara, I., Hiruy, A., Krystosik, A., Bonds, M., LaBeaud, A., Barry, M. AMER SOC TROP MED & HYGIENE. 2018: 659–60