Jake J. Lee, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor, Otolaryngology (Head and Neck Surgery)
Bio
Dr. Lee is a fellowship-trained head and neck surgical oncologist with Stanford Medicine Cancer Center’s Head and Neck Cancer Program. He is also a clinical assistant professor in the Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery at Stanford University School of Medicine.
He treats benign and malignant tumors of the head and neck, including oral cancer, tonsil cancer, throat cancer, and thyroid cancer. As a result of his fellowship training, he also specializes in minimally invasive transoral surgery, organ preserving laryngeal surgery, and microvascular free flap reconstruction. Microvascular free flap reconstruction involves moving a piece of tissue, with blood vessels included, to a different part of the body to preserve function after cancer therapy.
Dr. Lee’s research interests include assessment of head and neck cancer treatment outcomes and development of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in order to optimize form and function. He has also studied new therapies for smell and taste loss, including the design and implementation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
He has published in several peer-reviewed journals, including JAMA Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Head & Neck, Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, and Laryngoscope. He has presented to his peers at international, national, and regional meetings, including the annual meetings of the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS), American Rhinologic Society (ARS), and the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS).
Dr. Lee is a member of the AHNS, AAO-HNS, and Triological Society. He has previously served as the chair of the AAO-HNS Foundation Section for Residents and Fellows-in-Training.
Clinical Focus
- Otolaryngology
Academic Appointments
-
Clinical Assistant Professor, Otolaryngology (Head and Neck Surgery)
Honors & Awards
-
William K. Sieber, MD, Award for Excellence in Pediatric Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
-
Resident Research CORE Grant, American Rhinologic Society
-
Resident Leadership Travel Grant, American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS)
-
Resident Bowl Competition Finalist, Triological Society 2019 Combined Sections Meeting
-
Poster Award (Second Place), Triological Society 2016 Combined Sections Meeting
-
Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Resident Teaching Award, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
-
Michael Paparella Research Award—Second Place Clinical, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
-
Dr. Tryphena Humphrey Student Award in Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Department of Neurology
-
Dean’s Summer Research Project Grant, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
-
Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Professional Education
-
Fellowship: University of Pennsylvania Head and Neck Oncology and Microvascular Recontrusctruction (2024) PA
-
Residency: Washington University School of Medicine Otolaryngology Program (2023) MO
-
Medical Education: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (2016) PA
All Publications
-
Quality of Life for Patients with Sporadic Small Vestibular Schwannomas Following Middle Fossa Craniotomy.
Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
2024; 45 (6): 684-689
Abstract
To evaluate quality-of-life outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) undergoing a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach.Prospective study from 2018 to 2023.Tertiary academic institution.Adults with sporadic VS.MCF.The primary outcome measure was the change in preoperative and 1-year postoperative Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-life (PANQOL) scores. Secondary outcome measures included hearing preservation and facial nerve function.Of the 164 patients who underwent MCF for sporadic VS, 78 patients elected to voluntarily complete preoperative PANQOL assessments prior to surgery. Seventy-one (91%) of those 78 patients completed postoperative PANQOL surveys. Fifty (70%) of the respondents were female and the median age was 48 years (range, 27-71 years). Overall, at 1-year postsurgery, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was obtained in the hearing (mean difference, 10.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-16.7) and anxiety (mean difference, 18.8; 95% CI, 11.7-25.9) domains. For patients with hearing preservation (n = 48, 68%), MCIDs were reached in the hearing (mean difference, 13.4; 95% CI, 6.3-20.6), anxiety (mean difference, 20.8; 95% CI, 11.8-29.9), energy (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8), pain (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8) domains, and overall PANQOL scores (mean difference, 12.7; 95% CI, 7.1-18.3). Postoperatively, 64 (90%) patients maintained a House-Brackmann I.To our knowledge, this is the largest study examining disease-specific QOL for VS patients undergoing MCF. Based on our institution's experience, MCF approach for small VS is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in QOL, hearing preservation, and excellent facial nerve outcomes.
View details for DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004202
View details for PubMedID 38769097
-
Airway protection and outcomes after staged versus concurrent bilateral neck dissections with transoral base of tongue cancer resection
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK
2024; 46 (5): 1020-1027
Abstract
To assess airway, safety, and resource utilization outcomes between transoral base of tongue (BOT) surgery with staged versus concurrent bilateral neck dissections (BND).A retrospective cohort study of patients with human papilloma virus (HPV)-related BOT cancer who underwent transoral surgery and BND from January 2015 through June 2022 was conducted. Free flap patients were excluded.Of 126 patients (46 [37%] staged and 80 [63%] concurrent BND), there were no significant differences in rates of postoperative intubation, tracheostomy, intensive care admission, operative takebacks, gastrostomy, and 30-day readmission. Total operative time (median difference 1.4 [95% CI 0.9-1.8] hours), length of stay (1.0 [1.0-1.0] day), and time between primary surgery and adjuvant therapy initiation (4.0 [0.0-8.0] days) were lower in the concurrent BND cohort.Concurrent BND alongside transoral BOT resection is safe with similar airway outcomes and lower total operative time, length of stay, and time to adjuvant therapy initiation compared to staged BND.
View details for DOI 10.1002/hed.27696
View details for Web of Science ID 001174002200001
View details for PubMedID 38414192
-
Neighborhood socioeconomic status and race are associated with incidence disparities in oral cavity cancers.
Oral oncology
2023; 147: 106607
Abstract
To determine the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), race and incidence rate trends of oral cavity cancer (OCC).We used data from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) 18 Census Tract-level SES and Rurality Database (2006-2018) database of the National Cancer Institute to create cohorts of OCC patients between 2006 and 2018. Annual incidence rates were calculated and trends in rates were estimated using joinpoints regression.The incidence of OCC is the highest among low nSES White Americans (2.86 per 100 000 persons) and the lowest among high nSES Black Americans (1.17 per 100 000 persons). Incidence has significantly increased among Asian Americans (annual percent change [APC]: low nSES-2.4, high nSES-2.6) and White Americans (APC: low nSES-1.4, high nSES-1.6). Significant increases in the incidence of oral tongue cancer in these groups primarily drive this increase. Other increases were noted in alveolar ridge cancer among White Americans and hard palate cancer among Asian Americans. OCC incidence decreased significantly in Hispanic Americans of high nSES (APC: -2.5) and Black Americans of low nSES (APC: -2.7). Floor of mouth cancer incidence decreased among most groups.Despite the overall decreasing incidence of OCC, these trends are inconsistent among all OCC subsites. Differences are seen by race, nSES, and subsite, indicating intersectional barriers that extend beyond nSES and race and ethnicity alone. Further research on risk factors and developing interventions targeting vulnerable groups is needed.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106607
View details for PubMedID 37897859
-
Development and Psychometric Validation of the Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
2022; 148 (12): 1132-1138
Abstract
Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is an increasingly common and morbid condition, especially given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, the ability to reproducibly measure smell loss-associated quality of life (QOL) and its response to treatment is paramount.To develop and validate a concise and visually appealing smell loss-associated QOL patient-reported outcome measure for OD.A secondary analysis of comments to an online survey by 1000 patients with olfactory dysfunction published in 2013 was used as the primary source to generate items of the Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR). In addition, 30 patients with OD enrolled in 2 clinical studies at a tertiary care medical center (Washington University) were asked to identify their main concerns associated with smell loss. And finally, 4 otolaryngologists reviewed the items generated from the online survey and the patients' interviews to identify any additional items. Prospective study design was used for data collection from the 30 patients and 4 otolaryngologists. Prospective study design was used for survey validation. Validation of the ODOR was performed with 283 patients enrolled in several prospective studies at a single institution that completed the ODOR as an outcome measure.Item generation and selection were the outcomes of ODOR development. The psychometric and clinimetric measures evaluated for validation were internal consistency, test-retest reliability, face and content validity, concurrent validity, and discriminant validity. Minimal clinically important difference was also determined.The ODOR is a 28-item instrument with each item scored as either no difficulty or very rarely bothered (0) to complete difficulty or very frequently bothered (4) with a total instrument score range of 0 to 112 points. Higher scores indicate higher degree of dysfunction and limitation. Validation in the cohort of 283 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.0 [14.4] years; 198 female participants [73%]; 179 White participants [80%]) revealed that the instrument has high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.968), test-retest reliability (r = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.95]), face validity, content validity, concurrent validity (r = 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80-0.91] compared with the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements; ρ = -0.76 [95% CI, -0.81 to -0.71] compared with a patient-reported symptom severity scale), and divergent validity (mean score difference, -33.9 [95% CI, -38.3 to -29.6] between normosmic patients and hyposmic/anosmic patients). The minimal clinically important difference was 15 points. The estimated time for survey completion was approximately 5 minutes.In this survey creation and validation study, the ODOR was shown to be a novel, concise, reliable, and valid patient-reported outcome measure of OD-associated QOL. It can be used to measure physical problems, functional limitations, and emotional consequences associated with OD and how they change after a given intervention, which is clinically applicable and particularly pertinent given the growing burden of OD associated with COVID-19.
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3299
View details for Web of Science ID 000870804900004
View details for PubMedID 36264557
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9585455
-
Natural trajectory of recovery of COVID-19 associated olfactory loss
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
2022; 43 (5): 103572
Abstract
Prevalence of post-viral olfactory loss has increased dramatically due to the frequency and severity of olfactory dysfunction associated with infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.To determine the trajectory of COVID-19 olfactory loss over a six-month period. A key secondary objective is to assess predictive factors associated with the recovery of olfaction.Longitudinal repeated-measures study that enrolled from May 5, 2020 to February 2, 2021, with the last date of data collection on June 15, 2021.Barnes-Jewish HealthCare/Washington University School of Medicine facilities (Saint Louis, Missouri, USA).Individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal swab and indicated olfactory loss on COVID-19 screening questionnaire. Individuals were excluded if they had previously diagnosed history of olfactory loss, neurodegenerative disorders, <18 years of age, admitted to hospital service, unable to read, write, and understand English, or lacked computer or internet access.Watch and wait for spontaneous recovery.Participants completed olfactory assessments every 30 days for six months. Each assessment consisted of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), an objective "scratch-and-sniff" test, and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), a subjective Likert rating scale.The mean age was 41 years old (SD = 16). 39 (80 %) were female and 42 (86 %) white. At baseline assessment of objective olfaction, 18 (36 %) participants had anosmia or severe hyposmia. Subjective, complete recovery at six months was 81 % (95 % CI 74 % to 88 %). Likelihood of recovery was associated with age <50 years (aHR = 8.1 (95 % CI 1.1 to 64.1)) and mild olfactory loss at baseline (UPSIT = 30-33 for males and 31-34 for females) (aHR 6.2 (95 % CI 1.2 to 33.0)).The trajectory of olfactory recovery among adults with COVID-19 olfactory loss illustrated rapid recovery within 2-3 weeks of infection, and by six months 81 % had recovered based on self-report. Age <50 years old and mild severity of olfactory loss at baseline were associated with increased likelihood of recovery of olfaction. These findings can be used to inform shared decision-making with patients.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103572
View details for Web of Science ID 000965856300017
View details for PubMedID 35969913
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9355743
-
Efficacy and Safety of Saline Nasal Irrigation Plus Theophylline for Treatment of COVID-19-Related Olfactory Dysfunction The SCENT2 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
2022; 148 (9): 830-837
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that theophylline added to saline nasal irrigation (SNI) can be an effective treatment for postviral olfactory dysfunction (OD), a growing public health concern during the COVID-19 pandemic.To evaluate the efficacy and safety of theophylline added to SNI compared with placebo for COVID-19-related OD.This triple-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted virtually between March 15 and August 31, 2021. Adults residing in Missouri or Illinois were recruited during this time period if they had OD persisting for 3 to 12 months following suspected COVID-19 infection. Data analysis was conducted from October to December 2021.Saline sinus rinse kits and bottles of identical-appearing capsules with either 400 mg of theophylline (treatment) or 500 mg of lactose powder (control) were mailed to consenting study participants. Participants were instructed to dissolve the capsule contents into the saline rinse and use the solution to irrigate their nasal cavities in the morning and at night for 6 weeks.The primary outcome was the difference in the rate of responders between the treatment and the control arms, defined as a response of at least slightly better improvement in the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale posttreatment. Secondary outcome measures included changes in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), the Questionnaire for Olfactory Disorders, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey on general health, and COVID-19-related questions.A total of 51 participants were enrolled in the study; the mean (SD) age was 46.0 (13.1) years, and 36 (71%) participants were women. Participants were randomized to SNI with theophylline (n = 26) or to SNI with placebo (n = 25). Forty-five participants completed the study. At the end of treatment, 13 (59%) participants in the theophylline arm reported at least slight improvement in the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (responders) compared with 10 (43%) in the placebo arm (absolute difference, 15.6%; 95% CI, -13.2% to 44.5%). The median difference for the UPSIT change between baseline and 6 weeks was 3.0 (95% CI, -1.0 to 7.0) for participants in the theophylline arm and 0.0 (95% CI, -2.0 to 6.0) for participants in the placebo arm. Mixed-model analysis revealed that the change in UPSIT scores through study assessments was not statistically significantly different between the 2 study arms. Eleven (50%) participants in the theophylline arm and 6 (26%) in the placebo arm had a change of 4 or more points in UPSIT scores from baseline to 6 weeks. The difference in the rate of responders as measured by the UPSIT was 24% (95% CI, -4% to 52%) in favor of theophylline.This randomized clinical trial suggests that the clinical benefit of theophylline nasal irrigations on olfaction in participants with COVID-19-related OD is inconclusive, though suggested by subjective assessments. Larger studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy of this treatment more fully.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04789499.
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1573
View details for Web of Science ID 000822041400003
View details for PubMedID 35797024
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9264240
-
Safety of High-Dose Nasal Theophylline Irrigation in the Treatment of Postviral Olfactory Dysfunction: a Dose-Escalation Study
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
2022; 148 (9): 885-886
Abstract
This case series aims to determine the maximum tolerable dose of theophylline delivered via high-volume, low-pressure nasal saline irrigation for treatment of postviral olfactory dysfunction.
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1574
View details for Web of Science ID 000822041400002
View details for PubMedID 35797023
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9264213
-
Risk Factors for Functional Outcomes in Advanced Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
LARYNGOSCOPE
2023; 133 (3): 594-600
Abstract
Chemoradiation for patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) may achieve organ preservation, but appropriate patient selection remains unknown. This study investigates pre-treatment risk factors associated with functional and survival outcomes after radiation-based therapy in patients with advanced laryngeal SCC.A retrospective cohort study was performed on 75 adult patients with stage III or IV laryngeal SCC receiving definitive radiation-based therapy from 1997 to 2016 at a tertiary care center. Tracheostomy and gastrostomy dependence were the primary functional outcomes. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate relationships between pre-treatment factors and tracheostomy and gastrostomy dependence. Time-to-event analyses were performed to determine risk factors associated with overall survival.Among 75 patients included in the analysis, 30 (40%) patients were tracheostomy dependent and 31 (41%) were gastrostomy tube dependent. The median length of follow-up was 31 months (range = 1 to 142 months). Pre-treatment tracheostomy was a significant predictor of post-treatment tracheostomy (aOR = 13.9, 95% CI = 3.35 to 57.5) and moderate-severe comorbidity was a significant predictor of post-treatment gastrostomy dependence (aOR = 2.96, 95% CI = 1.04 to 8.43). The five-year overall survival was 51% (95% CI = 38 to 64%). Pre-treatment gastrostomy tube dependence was associated with an increased risk of death (aHR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.09 to 5.53).Baseline laryngeal functional status and overall health in advanced laryngeal SCC are associated with poor functional outcomes after radiation-based therapy, highlighting the importance of patient selection when deciding between surgical and non-surgical treatment plans. Laryngoscope, 133:594-600, 2023.
View details for DOI 10.1002/lary.30166
View details for Web of Science ID 000801052800001
View details for PubMedID 35611799
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9691786
-
Infection Control With Topical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Mucosal Head and Neck Surgery: A Meta-analysis
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
2023; 168 (3): 261-268
Abstract
To assess for differences in surgical site infection (SSI) rates and bacterial load after major mucosal head and neck surgery between patients who received topical antimicrobial prophylaxis and those who did not.Ovid Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 20, 2021, with cross-referencing of retrieved studies per PRISMA guidelines.Inclusion criteria captured clinical trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies with infectious outcomes of adults who underwent major mucosal head and neck surgery and received perioperative topical antimicrobial therapy to the oral cavity and/or pharynx. Studies of dental procedures were excluded. The primary outcome was SSI rate, and the secondary outcome was bacterial load. Two blinded investigators screened each text.Of 265 unique citations, 9 studies of 470 total patients were included. Topical treatments included numerous antibiotics and antiseptics directly applied over mucosa. Pooled SSI rates of 252 patients in the intervention cohort and 218 in the control cohort were 8% (95% CI, 3%-14%; I 2 = 61.2%) and 29% (95% CI, 16%-43%; I 2 = 79.5%), respectively. A meta-analysis of 7 comparative studies totaling 192 patients receiving topical therapy and 218 control patients revealed a pooled relative risk of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.28-0.68; I 2 = 0.0%) in favor of the treatment group. The studies demonstrated a short-term decrease in bacterial counts after topical antimicrobial prophylaxis.Patients who underwent prophylactic topical antimicrobial therapy had less than half the risk of developing SSI after mucosal head and neck surgery when compared with those who received no topical prophylaxis.
View details for DOI 10.1177/01945998221100801
View details for Web of Science ID 000802021700001
View details for PubMedID 35608917
-
Eight Tales of Cervical Necrotizing Fasciitis and Free Tissue Transfer
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY
2023; 132 (2): 226-232
Abstract
Aggressive surgical debridement is required in cervical necrotizing fasciitis, and in severe defects, subsequent free tissue transfer might be necessary. However, there is concern that the inflammatory environment of the infection site may threaten free flap viability, particularly with concerns for thrombosis of feeding vessels and compromised tissue integration. Cases in the head and neck area are rare, so there are limited data regarding outcomes of free tissue transfer in these patients.A retrospective chart review assessed patients with cervical necrotizing fasciitis treated at an academic tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2021. Twenty-five patients were identified, and eight required free tissue transfer after adequate surgical debridement. Treatment, hospital course, and demographic data were collected on these eight patients.All flaps had full survival at follow up (median follow up 3 months, range 1-39 months) without concerns for vascular compromise.These data suggest that in patients with large soft tissue defects due to cervical necrotizing fasciitis, free tissue transfer may be a safe treatment modality.
View details for DOI 10.1177/00034894221088179
View details for Web of Science ID 000778023500001
View details for PubMedID 35373592
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9526756
-
Smell Changes and Efficacy of Nasal Theophylline (SCENT) irrigation: A randomized controlled trial for treatment of post-viral olfactory dysfunction
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
2022; 43 (2): 103299
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal theophylline saline irrigation on olfactory recovery in patients with post-viral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD).Between May 2019 and April 2020, we conducted a double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of adults with 6-36 months of PVOD. Patients were randomized to nasal theophylline saline irrigation or placebo saline irrigation twice a day for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the Global Rating of Smell Change. Secondary outcomes were changes in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) and Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS).Twenty-two patients (n = 12, theophylline; n = 10, placebo) completed the study. Slightly more patients in the theophylline group (33%) reported improved smell compared to the placebo group (30%, difference 3.3%, 95% CI -35.6% to 42.3%). The median differences in pre- and post-treatment UPSIT and QOD-NS change between the two groups were 1 (95% CI -3 to 5) and -10 (95% CI -15 to -4), respectively in favor of theophylline. Three patients receiving theophylline and 2 receiving placebo had clinically meaningful improvements on the UPSIT (difference 5%, 95% CI -30% to 40%). There were no adverse events, and serum theophylline levels were undetectable in 10/10 patients.While safe, there were no clinically meaningful differences in olfactory change between the two groups except for olfaction-related quality of life, which was better with theophylline. The imprecise estimates suggest future trials will need substantially larger sample sizes or treatment modifications, such as increasing the theophylline dose, to observe larger treatment effects.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103299
View details for Web of Science ID 000789011900007
View details for PubMedID 34894449
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9057210
-
Development and Validation of a Novel At-home Smell Assessment
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
2022; 148 (3): 252-258
Abstract
Current tools for diagnosis of olfactory dysfunction (OD) are costly, time-consuming, and often require clinician administration.To develop and validate a simple screening assessment for OD using common household items.This fully virtual diagnostic study included adults with self-reported OD from any cause throughout the US. Data were collected from December 2020 to April 2021 and analyzed from May 2021 to July 2021.Participants with self-reported olfactory dysfunction took a survey assessing smell perception of 45 household items and completed the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) smell questionnaire, the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), and the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Psychometric and clinimetric analyses were used to consolidate 45 household items into 2 short Novel Anosmia Screening at Leisure (NASAL) assessments, NASAL-7 (range, 0-14; lower score indicating greater anosmia) and NASAL-3 (range, 0-6; lower score indicating greater anosmia).A total of 115 participants were included in the study, with a median (range) age of 42 (19-70) years, 92 (80%) women, and 97 (84%) White individuals. There was a moderate correlation between the UPSIT and NASAL-7 scores and NASAL-3 scores (NASAL-7: ρ = 0.484; NASAL-3: ρ = 0.404). Both NASAL-7 and NASAL-3 had moderate accuracy in identifying participants with anosmia as defined by UPSIT (NASAL-7 area under the receiver operating curve [AUC], 0.706; 95% CI, 0.551-0.862; NASAL-3 AUC, 0.658; 95% CI, 0.503-0.814). Scoring 7 or less on the NASAL-7 had 70% (95% CI, 48%-86%) sensitivity and 53% (95% CI, 43%-63%) specificity in discriminating participants with anosmia from participants without. Scoring 2 or less on the NASAL-3 had 57% (95% CI, 36%-76%) sensitivity and 78% (95% CI, 69%-85%) specificity in discriminating participants with anosmia from participants without. There was moderate agreement between UPSIT-defined OD categories and those defined by NASAL-7 (weighted κ = 0.496; 95% CI, 0.343-0.649) and those defined by NASAL-3 (weighted κ = 0.365; 95% CI, 0.187-0.543). The agreement with self-reported severity of olfactory dysfunction as measured by CGI-S and the NASAL-7 and NASAL-3 was moderate, with a weighted κ of 0.590 (95% CI, 0.474-0.707) for the NASAL-7 and 0.597 (95% CI, 0.481-0.712) for the NASAL-3.The findings of this diagnostic study suggest that NASAL-7 and NASAL-3, inexpensive and brief patient-reported assessments, can be used to identify individuals with OD. As the burden of COVID-19-associated OD increases, these assessments may prove beneficial as screening and diagnostic tools. Future work will explore whether the NASAL assessments are sensitive to change and how much of a change is clinically important.
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.3994
View details for Web of Science ID 000742417300002
View details for PubMedID 35024772
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8759030
-
Chronic rhinosinusitis as a risk factor for intracranial and extracranial complications after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
2022; 43 (1): 103188
Abstract
To elucidate whether chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), usually an inflammatory-mediated rather than infectious process, is a risk factor for extracranial and intracranial complications after elective endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS).A single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent ETSS between January 2015 and July 2019 was performed, which included chart review and computed tomography assessment. CRS was defined by symptomatology and concurrent endoscopic or radiographic findings.Of 292 subjects, 11% (n = 33) met criteria for CRS. Median difference in Lund-Mackay scores between the CRS and non-CRS groups was 3.0 (95% CI 2.0-4.0). Complications included acute rhinosinusitis requiring antibiotics (23%, 68/292), epistaxis (10%, 28/292), meningitis (1%, 3/292), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (7%, 20/292), revision sinonasal procedures (10%, 28/292), and frequent in-office debridement (13%, 39/292). CRS was strongly associated with postoperative acute rhinosinusitis (aRR 1.85, 95% CI 1.18-2.90) and frequent debridement (aRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.00-3.83). Conversely, CRS was not associated with epistaxis (aRR 1.52, 95% CI 0.62-3.72), postoperative CSF leak (aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.24-3.44), or additional sinonasal procedures (aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.21-2.29). The rate of meningitis was not significantly higher in the CRS cohort (difference 2.2%, 95% CI -1.0% to 14.5%).CRS was a strong risk factor for acute rhinosinusitis and need for frequent in-office debridement after ETSS. It was not associated with other postoperative complications including epistaxis, CSF leak, or revision sinonasal procedures. CRS patients had a slightly higher rate of meningitis, which is likely not clinically meaningful.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103188
View details for Web of Science ID 000703495700001
View details for PubMedID 34537507
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9007068
-
Management of Flap Failure After Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
2022; 167 (2): 224-235
Abstract
To systematically review management of flap loss in head and neck construction with free tissue transfer as compared with locoregional flap or conservative management.Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to October 2019.Candidate articles were independently reviewed by 2 authors. Articles were considered eligible if they included adequate reporting of flap management after flap loss and outcomes for survival of reconstruction, length of hospitalization, and perioperative complications.A total of 429 patients had acute flap failure in the perioperative period. The overall success with a secondary free flap was 93% (95% CI, 0.89-0.97; n = 26 studies, I2 = 12.8%). There was no difference in hospitalization length after secondary reconstruction between free tissue transfer and locoregional flaps or conservative management (relative risk of hospitalization ≥2 weeks, 96%; 95% CI, 0.80-1.14; n = 3 studies, I2 = 0). The pooled relative risk of perioperative complications following free tissue transfer was 0.60 when compared with locoregional flap or conservative management (95% CI, 0.40-0.92; n = 5 studies, I2 = 0).Salvage reconstruction with free tissue transfer has a high success rate. Second free flaps following flap failure had a similar length of hospitalization and lower overall complication rate than locoregional reconstruction or conservative management. A second free tissue transfer, when feasible, is likely a more reliable and effective procedure for salvage reconstruction.
View details for DOI 10.1177/01945998211044683
View details for Web of Science ID 000693425300001
View details for PubMedID 34491852
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8972962
-
Endonasal Free Flap Reconstruction Combined With Draf Frontal Sinusotomy for Complex Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Technical Report & Case Series
OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY
2021; 21 (6): 478-484
Abstract
Frontal sinus cranialization with closure via bifrontal pericranial flaps is the gold standard for separating the nasofrontal recess from the intracranial cavity for posterior table defects. Despite the high success rate, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak may persist and is particularly challenging when vascularized reconstructive options from the bicoronal incision are exhausted.To assess a novel endonasal technique using an adipofascial radial forearm free flap delivered to the frontal recess through a Draf sinusotomy to repair complex CSF leaks from the frontal sinus.A retrospective review of 3 patients (all male; ages 42, 43, and 69 yr) with persistent CSF leak despite frontal sinus cranialization and repair with bifrontal pericranium was performed. Etiology of injury was traumatic in 2 patients and iatrogenic in 1 patient after anaplastic meningioma treatment. To create space for the flap and repair the nasofrontal ducts, endoscopic Draf III (Case 1, 3) or Draf IIb left frontal sinusotomy (Case 2) was performed. The forearm flap was harvested, passed through a Caldwell-Luc exposure, and placed within the Draf frontal sinustomy. The flap vessels were tunneled to the left neck and anastomosed to the facial vessels by the mandibular notch.Intraoperatively, the flaps were well-seated and provided a watertight seal. Postoperative hospital courses were uncomplicated. There were no new CSF leaks or flap necrosis at 12, 14, and 16 mo.Endoscopic endonasal free flap reconstruction through a Draf procedure is a novel viable option for persistent CSF leak after failed frontal sinus cranialization.
View details for DOI 10.1093/ons/opab309
View details for Web of Science ID 000728385500020
View details for PubMedID 34423844
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8599085
-
The Impact of Treatment Delay on Malunion and Nonunion After Open Reduction of Mandible Fractures
FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY & AESTHETIC MEDICINE
2021; 23 (6): 460-466
Abstract
Importance: Time to surgical intervention is an oft-investigated potentially modifiable risk factor for complications after mandible fracture. Objective: To identify novel risk factors for malunion/nonunion after mandible fracture and determine the impact of treatment delay on malunion and nonunion after open reduction of mandible fractures. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting and Participants: Encounter billing records from the New York State Inpatient Databases, State Emergency Department Databases, and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases. Patients aged 18 years and older with isolated mandible fracture in the emergency department or inpatient setting from January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mandibular Malunion/Nonunion. Results: A total of 19,152 adults were diagnosed with isolated mandible fracture. After fracture, 247 patients (1.3%) developed mandibular malunion or nonunion. In multivariable analysis, patients with open fractures (odds ratio [OR] 1.93, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.40-2.65), body fractures (OR 2.00, 1.50-2.65), alcohol abuse (OR 1.61, 1.22-2.11), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.57, 1.02-2.42), and Medicaid insurance (OR 1.46, 1.03-2.07) had increased risk, whereas patients with subcondylar fractures had reduced risk (OR 0.45, 0.28-0.72) of mandibular malunion/nonunion. The risk of mandibular malunion/nonunion after open reduction increased with treatment delay until 6-7 days after presentation (OR 1.84, 1.11-3.06). Conclusion and Relevance: Although treatment delay is often unavoidable, these findings suggest that physicians should consider early intervention in patients requiring open reduction of mandible fractures when able.
View details for DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0607
View details for Web of Science ID 000677779100001
View details for PubMedID 34314633
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8905255
-
Computed Tomography as a Predictor of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma Origin, Skull Base Involvement, and Stage
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE
2021; 82: E335-E341
Abstract
Objective To investigate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) to determine the origin, skull base involvement, and stage of sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP). Design This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting This is set at a tertiary care medical center. Participants Patients with preoperative CT imaging who underwent extirpative surgery for histologically confirmed sinonasal IP between January 2005 and October 2019. Main Outcome Measures The likely sites of tumor origin, skull base involvement, and radiographic tumor stage were determined by two board-certified neuroradiologists after re-reviewing preoperative CT imaging. These radiologic findings were then compared with intraoperative and pathologic findings. Results Of 86 patients, 74% (64/86) had IP lesions with correctly classified sites of origin on CT. CT was not sensitive for diagnosing ethmoid sinus origin (48%, 52%), frontal sinus origin (80%, 40%), and skull base origin (17%, 17%). CT was not sensitive (62%, 57%) but specific (86%, 98%) for identifying any skull base involvement. There was substantial-to-near perfect agreement between radiographic and pathologic Cannady stages (weighted κ = 0.61 for rater 1; weighted κ = 0.81 for rater 2). Interrater agreement was substantial for identifying tumor origin (κ = 0.75) and stage (weighted κ = 0.62) and moderate for identifying skull base involvement (κ = 0.43). Conclusion Interrater agreement on CT findings was substantial except on skull base involvement. CT correctly predicted site of tumor origin in up to 74% of subjects. CT was not sensitive for diagnosing skull base involvement but had substantial-to-near perfect agreement with pathologic tumor staging. CT is a useful but albeit limited adjunct for tumor localization and surgical planning for sinonasal IP.
View details for DOI 10.1055/s-0040-1701677
View details for Web of Science ID 000674444400048
View details for PubMedID 34306958
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8289507
-
Endoscopic Adipofascial Radial Forearm Free Flap Reconstruction of the Skull Base: A Technical Update
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE
2021; 82: E243-E247
Abstract
Objective While most defects after endoscopic endonasal resections can be closed with local or locoregional options, rare cases require free tissue transfer. In this setting, while minimally invasive techniques have been described, the essential procedural details are lacking. The objective of this report is to describe several key technical modifications to free flap harvest and endoscopic-assisted inset which decrease morbidity and improve reliability and efficiency. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of consecutive patients treated at Washington University in St. Louis with endoscopic free flap reconstruction through a Caldwell-Luc/transbuccal approach between January 2016 and September 2019. Results A total of six patients underwent adipofascial radial forearm free flap with this technique, five for recalcitrant cerebrospinal fluid leak or pneumocephalus and one for osteoradionecrosis. All flaps survived and there were no flap-related complications. Five patients (83%) achieved successful healing and separation of the sinonasal cavity and intracranial space. One patient developed recurrent pneumocephalus. Three key technical modifications were identified that improve efficiency and reliability of flap delivery and inset: (1) use of an adipofascial radial forearm flap, without skin paddle; (2) wide resection of the anterior and lateral maxillary face to facilitate flap delivery; and (3) precise defect measurement and flap contouring prior to inset to prevent any need to debulk the flap in situ. Conclusion Endoscopic adipofascial radial forearm free flap delivered to the skull base through a Caldwell-Luc/transbuccal corridor is a feasible option with a high success rate and low morbidity when other reconstructive attempts have failed.
View details for DOI 10.1055/s-0040-1710327
View details for Web of Science ID 000674444400035
View details for PubMedID 34306945
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8289511
-
Free vascularized parascapular fat flap for parotidectomy reconstruction
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
2021; 42 (5): 103028
Abstract
The contour defect resulting after parotidectomy can be cosmetically unappealing. Multiple reconstructive efforts have been reported to mitigate this problem. We describe a novel technique of vascularized parascapular fat reconstruction based on the circumflex scapular vessels and evaluate its outcomes.Consecutive patients who underwent parotidectomy with or without additional resections and vascularized parascapular fat flap reconstruction in 2020 were included. Demographic, morphologic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were assessed.Eight patients (3 female) were included. Median cut-to-close time was 247 (range 209-298) minutes, including tumor ablation. None of the patients had any wound complications, and all except one was discharged on postoperative day 1. Flap monitoring was not performed. None reported any significant donor site morbidity except scar formation. At last follow up, all patients reported satisfactory facial contour.Vascularized parascapular fat flap reconstruction of parotidectomy contour defects has satisfactory cosmetic outcomes with minimal morbidity and short hospitalization courses.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103028
View details for Web of Science ID 000692196400046
View details for PubMedID 33848769
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8975255
-
Association of Olfactory Training With Neural Connectivity in Adults With Postviral Olfactory Dysfunction
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
2021; 147 (6): 502-509
Abstract
Viral upper respiratory tract infections are a major cause of olfactory loss. Olfactory training (OT) is a promising intervention for smell restoration; however, a mechanistic understanding of the changes in neural plasticity induced by OT is absent.To evaluate functional brain connectivity in adults with postviral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD) before and after OT using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.This prospective cohort study, conducted from September 1, 2017, to November 30, 2019, recruited adults with clinically diagnosed or self-reported PVOD of 3 months or longer. Baseline olfaction was measured using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) and the Sniffin' Sticks test. Analysis was performed between December 1, 2020, and July 1, 2020.Participants completed 12 weeks of OT using 4 essential oils: rose, eucalyptus, lemon, and clove. The resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements were obtained before and after intervention.The primary outcome measure was the change in functional brain connectivity before and after OT. Secondary outcome measures included changes in UPSIT and Sniffin' Sticks test scores, as well as patient-reported changes in treatment response as measured by subjective changes in smell and quality-of-life measures.A total of 16 participants with PVOD (11 female [69%] and 14 White [88%]; mean [SD] age, 60.0 [10.5] years; median duration of smell loss, 12 months [range, 3-240 months]) and 20 control participants (15 [75%] female; 17 [85%] White; mean [SD] age, 55.0 [9.2] years; median UPSIT score, 37 [range, 34-39]) completed the study. At baseline, participants had increased connectivity within the visual cortex when compared with normosmic control participants, a connection that subsequently decreased after OT. Furthermore, 4 other network connectivity values were observed to change after OT, including an increase in connectivity between the left parietal occipital junction, a region of interest associated with olfactory processing, and the cerebellum.The use of OT is associated with connectivity changes within the visual cortex. This case-control cohort study suggests that there is a visual connection to smell that has not been previously explored with OT and that further studies examining the efficacy of a bimodal visual and OT program are needed.
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0086
View details for Web of Science ID 000630483900004
View details for PubMedID 33734298
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC7974830
-
Survival Outcomes of De Novo vs Inverted Papilloma-Associated Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
2021; 147 (4): 350-359
Abstract
Overall, the prognosis of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is poor. This malignancy can arise de novo or from inverted papillomas, but it is unclear whether survival differences between the 2 pathologies exist.To assess for survival differences between patients with sinonasal de novo SCC (dnSCC) and those with inverted papilloma-associated SCC (IPSCC).A search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 23, 2020, with cross-referencing of retrieved studies, was performed. Additional data were requested from authors.Inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to capture studies with survival outcomes of adults with sinonasal SCC who underwent regular treatment. Clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series with more than 10 adults aged 18 years or older with sinonasal SCC were included. Exclusion criteria were studies on non-SCC sinonasal neoplasms, studies without histopathologic diagnoses, non-English language articles, nonhuman animal studies, and abstract-only articles. Two blinded investigators (J.J.L., A.M.P., T.W.E., or N.S.W.) screened each abstract and full text, and a third investigator (J.J.L. or P.P.) adjudicated discrepancies. Of 729 unique citations, 26 studies of 1194 total patients were included.Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were followed. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were used to assess study quality. Two blinded investigators (J.J.L., A.M.P., T.W.E., or N.S.W.) independently extracted data from each study. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.The primary outcome was overall survival, and secondary outcomes were disease-free and disease-specific survival. Before data collection, it was hypothesized that the dnSCC cohort would have worse survival outcomes than the IPSCC cohort.One study of patients with dnSCC, 12 studies of patients with IPSCC, and 5 studies with both cohorts were included in the meta-analysis of overall survival. The pooled 5-year overall survival rate for 255 patients with dnSCC was 56% (95% CI, 41%-71%; I2 = 83.8%) and for 475 patients with IPSCC was 65% (95% CI, 56%-73%; I2 = 75.7%). Five comparative studies of both cohorts totaling 240 patients with dnSCC and 155 patients with IPSCC were included in another meta-analysis. The pooled overall survival hazard ratio was 1.87 (95% CI, 1.24-2.84; I2 = 0%).This systematic review and meta-analysis found that patients with dnSCC had almost a 2-fold increased risk of mortality compared with those with IPSCC. Large, multicenter studies are necessary to validate these findings before considering treatment alterations such as de-escalation based on histopathology.
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.5261
View details for Web of Science ID 000612829400003
View details for PubMedID 33507208
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC7844698
-
Survival of Young Versus Old Patients With Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
LARYNGOSCOPE
2021; 131 (6): 1310-1319
Abstract
To assess whether young patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) demonstrate worse oncologic outcomes than older patients after definitive therapy.Systematic review and meta-analysis.A medical librarian composed a search strategy to identify relevant studies in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and other major databases (Prospero registration number CRD42019127974). Inclusion criteria were adults with histologically diagnosed OCSCC that underwent treatment, comparator groups with an age cutoff of 40 years old, and reported survival outcomes. Articles were excluded if they contained patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma or patients treated for palliative intent. Overall survival hazard ratios were analyzed with a meta-analysis.There were 23,382 patients with OCSCC that were treated with definitive therapy from 22 included studies. The pooled cohort contained 2,238 (10%) patients ≤40 years of age. Oral tongue was the most common subsite in both the younger (n = 1,961, 91%) and older (n = 18,047, 88%) cohorts. The majority of OCSCCs were either T1 or T2, representing 859 (80%) malignancies in younger patients and 8,126 (77%) malignancies in older patients. A meta-analysis of nine studies demonstrated that younger patients did not experience worse survival outcomes than older patients (hazard ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.66-1.41).Young adults with OCSCC experienced similar oncologic outcomes as older patients with OCSCC after definitive treatment. Until compelling evidence demonstrates clinically relevant differences between these two cohorts, their approach to management should be similar. Future studies should consider comorbidities and using age 40 as a standard age cutoff to provide more uniform data moving forward. Laryngoscope, 131:1310-1319, 2021.
View details for DOI 10.1002/lary.29260
View details for Web of Science ID 000594888300001
View details for PubMedID 33264444
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8106620
-
Curbing the Cough: Multimodal Treatments for Neurogenic Cough: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
LARYNGOSCOPE
2022; 132 (1): 107-123
Abstract
Neurogenic cough affects 11% of Americans and causes significant detriment to quality of life. With the advent of novel therapies, the objective of this review is to determine how procedural therapies (e.g., superior laryngeal nerve block) compare to other established pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments for neurogenic cough.With the assistance of a medical librarian, a systematic review was performed using PICOS (patients, interventions, comparator, outcome, study design) format: adults with neurogenic cough receiving any pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic treatment for neurogenic cough compared to adults with neurogenic cough receiving any other relevant interventions, or treated as single cohorts, assessed with cough-specific quality of life outcomes, in all study designs and case series with ≥ 10 cases. Case reports, review articles, non-human studies, non-English language articles, and unavailable full-text articles were excluded.There were 2408 patients with neurogenic cough in this review, treated with medical therapy (77%), speech therapy (19%), both medical and speech therapy (1%), and procedural therapy (3%). The included studies ranged from low to intermediate quality. Overall, most interventions demonstrated successful improvement in cough. However, the heterogeneity of included study designs precluded direct comparisons between intervention types.This meta-analysis compared various treatments for neurogenic cough. Procedural therapy should be considered in the armamentarium of neurogenic cough treatments, particularly in patients refractory to, or intolerant of, the side effects of medical therapy. Lastly, this review illuminates key areas for improving neurogenic cough diagnosis, such as strict adherence to diagnostic and treatment guidelines, sophisticated reflux testing, and standardized, consistent outcome reporting. Laryngoscope, 132:107-123, 2022.
View details for DOI 10.1002/lary.29146
View details for Web of Science ID 000581255500001
View details for PubMedID 33085095
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8058694
-
Efficacy of Timolol in a Novel Intranasal Thermosensitive Gel for Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia-Associated Epistaxis A Randomized Clinical Trial
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
2020; 146 (11): 1006-1014
Abstract
Other than nasal moisturizers, no standard-of-care medical therapy exists for epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). With epistaxis as the greatest cause of morbidity in patients with HHT, there is a need to identify effective topical therapies.To determine the efficacy and safety of an intranasal timolol thermosensitive gel vs placebo thermosensitive gel in treating HHT-associated epistaxis.This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 29, 2019, to May 20, 2020, at a tertiary care center. A total of 27 patients with HHT and moderate-to-severe epistaxis were recruited and included in this prespecified analysis: 14 in the timolol group and 13 in the placebo group. Inclusion criteria included (1) age 18 years or older, (2) clinical or genetic diagnosis of HHT, (3) screening Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) of 4 or greater and 2 or more nosebleeds cumulatively lasting at least 5 minutes per week, (4) stable epistaxis pattern over the preceding 3 months, and (5) no change in epistaxis treatment or nasal hygiene regimen in the preceding month. Exclusion criteria included (1) contraindications to systemic β-blocker administration, (2) use of medications interacting with timolol, (3) use of antiangiogenic medications in the last month before recruitment, and (4) use of anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or fibrinolytic therapies within the last month.Novel thermosensitive intranasal timolol (0.1%) gel vs placebo thermosensitive gel applied twice daily to each nostril for 8 weeks.The primary outcome was the median change in ESS and percentage of participants reaching the minimal clinically important difference in ESS. Secondary outcomes were changes in Clinical Global Impression-Severity and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores, Nasal Outcome Score for Epistaxis in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia, and hemoglobin level.Of 27 participants randomized (median [range] age, 55 [20-76] years; 14 women [52%]; 25 White [93%]), a total of 23 patients with HHT completed the primary outcome measure. Within the timolol gel and placebo gel groups, respectively, the median change (range) in ESS was 2.32 (0.22 to 5.97) vs 1.96 (-0.91 to 5.98), and 9 of 11 (82%) vs 9 of 12 (75%) participants experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in ESS. Twenty-two of the 23 participants (96%) reported improvement via the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score, with 81% vs 58% of participants reporting reduced severity of epistaxis in the timolol vs placebo group, respectively. Of participants completing the Nasal Outcome Score for Epistaxis in HHT at follow-up visit, 7 of 10 (70%) in the timolol group achieved a clinically important difference vs 5 of 10 (50%) in the placebo group. There was no change in hemoglobin level between or within groups. Zero participants in the placebo group and 2 of 13 (15%) in the timolol group withdrew because of adverse events.Thermosensitive gel, alone or in combination with timolol, was highly effective in reducing HHT-associated epistaxis. The timolol group had greater improvement in epistaxis and quality of life than the placebo group, but effect estimates were imprecise, and no definitive conclusions on the superiority of timolol can be drawn. Physicians treating patients with HHT-associated epistaxis should consider a thermosensitive gel (with or without timolol) for their patients.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04139018.
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3025
View details for Web of Science ID 000572405900004
View details for PubMedID 32940653
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC7499238
-
Untreated head and neck cancer: Natural history and associated factors
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK
2021; 43 (1): 89-97
Abstract
This study aims to provide modern estimates of survival for untreated head and neck cancer (HNC) and to identify patient- and tumor-specific factors associated with not receiving definitive treatment.Adults with mucosal HNC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Median overall survival of untreated patients was calculated and stratified by site and stage. Cause-specific survival and factors associated with no treatment were investigated with advanced statistics.The study cohort included 6477 patients who received no treatment. Overall, untreated patients had a median survival of 12 months, with significant variability by site and stage. Multivariable analysis identified advanced age, black race, unmarried status, and lack of private insurance as associated with no treatment.Survival of HNC without treatment is dismal, yet substantial variation exists by tumor site and stage. Higher rates of no treatment among the poor and racial minorities are potentially driven by disparities in care availability and provision.
View details for DOI 10.1002/hed.26460
View details for Web of Science ID 000567832100001
View details for PubMedID 32914515
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8970342
-
Risk Factors for Patient-Reported Olfactory Dysfunction After Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Hypophysectomy
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
2020; 146 (7): 621-629
Abstract
Iatrogenic olfactory dysfunction after endoscopic transsphenoidal hypophysectomy (ETSH) is an overlooked complication without elucidated risk factors.To assess the independent prognostic role of demographic, comorbidity, cephalometric, intraoperative, histological, and postoperative parameters in patient-reported postoperative olfactory dysfunction, and to explore the association between anatomical measurements of the skull base and sinonasal cavity and postoperative olfactory dysfunction.This retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care medical center enrolled consecutive patients with primary sellar lesions who underwent ETSH between January 1, 2015, and January 31, 2019. Patients were excluded if they underwent multiple sinonasal surgical procedures, presented with a sellar malignant neoplasm, required an expanded transsphenoidal approach, had nasal polyposis or a neurodegenerative disease, or sustained traumatic brain injury. After undergoing medical record review and telephone screening, patients were asked to participate in a 3-item telephone survey.The primary outcome was the Clinical Global Impressions change in smell rating, a validated transitional patient-reported outcome measure. Patients rated their change in smell before and after ETSH on a 7-point Likert scale, with the following response options: (1) much better, (2) somewhat better, (3) slightly better, (4) neither better nor worse, (5) slightly worse, (6) somewhat worse, or (7) much worse. Responses of slightly worse, somewhat worse, and much worse were surrogates for postoperative olfactory dysfunction status. Patient medical records, preoperative imaging scans, operative notes, and pathology reports were reviewed.Of the 147 patients (mean [SD] age, 54 [15] years; 79 women [54%]) who responded to the telephone survey, 42 (29%) reported olfactory dysfunction after ETSH. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time between the ETSH completion and survey response was 31.1 (21-43) months. On multivariable analysis, abdominal fat grafting (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 2.95; 95% CI, 1.89-4.60) was associated with postoperative olfactory dysfunction, whereas smoking history (aRR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.95-2.51) demonstrated a clinically meaningful but imprecise effect size. A more obtuse angle between the planum sphenoidale and face of the sella turcica on sagittal imaging was protective (aRR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99). Increased number of months after the ETSH was associated with patient-reported normosmia (aRR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.95). In contrast, other comorbidities; intraoperative variables such as turbinate resection, nasoseptal flap, and mucosal or bone grafting; histological variables such as pathology and proliferative index; and postoperative variables such as adjuvant radiotherapy were not associated with postoperative olfactory dysfunction.This study found that abdominal fat grafting, acute skull base angle, and smoking history appeared to be clinically significant risk factors for patient-reported postoperative olfactory dysfunction. Increased time after ETSH may be associated with better olfactory outcomes.
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0673
View details for Web of Science ID 000553155200006
View details for PubMedID 32379292
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC7206533
-
Randomized clinical trial to evaluate mometasone lavage vs spray for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps who have not undergone sinus surgery
INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY
2020; 10 (8): 936-943
Abstract
There is no consensus regarding the best route of intranasal delivery of corticosteroids in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The study objective of this work was to compare the impact of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) vs mometasone nasal irrigation in the management of CRS patients who have not undergone sinus surgery.A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted in adults with CRS. Individuals with nasal polyps and/or history of sinus surgery were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive 8 weeks of either MFNS or mometasone nasal irrigation. The primary outcome measure was change in the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score between the 2 groups. Secondary outcome measures included patient global response to treatment and Lund-Kennedy endoscopy scores.A total of 43 participants completed the study (n = 22, MFNS; n = 21,mometasone nasal irrigation). Fourteen (64%) participants in the MFNS group and 17 (81%) in the mometasone lavage group had a clinically meaningful improvement in SNOT-22 scores with a proportion difference of 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], -9% to 44%). The least-squares (LS) mean difference between the 2 groups for SNOT-22 was -8.6 (95% CI, -17.7 to 0.58; p = 0.07), whereas the LS mean difference between the 2 groups for Lund-Kennedy endoscopy scores was 0.16 (95% CI, -0.84 to 1.15; p = 0.75). No adverse events were associated with the study.Both MFNS and mometasone nasal irrigations are beneficial in symptom management of CRS. Our study suggests that patients who perform mometasone lavage do better in a clinically meaningful way, but our results are not definitive and further studies are warranted.
View details for DOI 10.1002/alr.22586
View details for Web of Science ID 000536046700001
View details for PubMedID 32470217
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8932402
-
Clinical Research Needs for the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in the New Era of Biologics: A National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Workshop
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE
2020; 8 (5): 1532-+
Abstract
The development of biologics targeting various aspects of type 2 inflammation for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) will provide clinicians with powerful tools to help treat these patients. However, other therapies are also available, and positioning of biologics in a management algorithm will require comparative trials. In November 2019, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases convened a workshop to consider potential future trial designs. Workshop participants represented a wide spectrum of clinical specialties, including otolaryngology, allergy, and pulmonary medicine, as well as expertise in CRSwNP pathophysiology and in trial methodology and statistics. The workshop discussed the current state of knowledge in CRSwNP and considered the advantages and disadvantages of various clinical trial or observational study designs and various clinical outcomes. The output from this workshop, which is presented in this report, will hopefully provide investigators with adequate information and ideas to design future studies and answer critical clinical questions. It will also help clinicians understand the current state of the management of CRSwNP and its gaps and be more able to interpret the new information to come.
View details for Web of Science ID 000532753200008
View details for PubMedID 32142964
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8177483
-
Morphologic, intraoperative, and histologic risk factors for sinonasal inverted papilloma recurrence
WILEY. 2020: 590-596
Abstract
Sinonasal inverted papillomas (IP) are benign neoplasms with a propensity for local recurrence. Many risk factors are reported, with little consistency between studies. This study aimed to comprehensively assess for demographic, imaging, histopathologic, and intraoperative risk factors for recurrence.We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with pathologically diagnosed IP without malignancy who underwent surgical resection between 1997 and 2018. Eligible patients were identified through a database maintained by the Department of Pathology. Logistic regression identified variables associated with recurrence, and conjunctive consolidation was performed to create a predictive model.Of 76 subjects, 37% (n = 28) had recurrence. Median follow-up and time to recurrence were 2.9 (range 0.5-21.1) and 1.7 (range 0.2-13.0) years, respectively. Confirmed negative margins on histology were protective (odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.85). Frontal sinus involvement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.83, 95% CI 1.20-28.37), incomplete resection (aOR 9.67, 95% CI 2.24-41.72), and presence of dysplasia (aOR 4.38, 95% CI 1.01-19.10) were significantly associated with recurrence on multivariable analysis. A three-level composite recurrence risk staging system was created by consolidating the above three variables. The recurrence risks of composite stage I, II, and III disease were 20%, 38%, and 100%, respectively. No demographic, imaging, staging, or surgical approach variables were associated with recurrence.Frontal sinus involvement, incomplete resection, and dysplasia were significant risk factors for IP recurrence, whereas confirmed negative margins were protective. Creation of a composite staging system using the above variables may allow for risk stratification and a patient-specific approach to postoperative IP management.3 Laryngoscope, 130:590-596, 2020.
View details for DOI 10.1002/lary.28078
View details for Web of Science ID 000514225500009
View details for PubMedID 31112326
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC7323917
-
Trend of surgery for orbital cellulitis: An analysis of state inpatient databases
WILEY. 2020: 567-574
Abstract
To evaluate the trend and factors associated with surgical management of orbital cellulitis.Retrospective database study.Study using the State Inpatient Databases (SIDs) from 2008 to 2015. Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis code for orbital cellulitis were identified in the SIDs for the following states: Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Maryland, Nebraska, New York, and Wisconsin. Surgery was defined as an ICD-9-CM procedure code for orbitotomy and/or functional endoscopic sinus surgery. The trend of surgery over time was evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage test. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify patient- and hospital-level factors associated with surgery.From 2008 to 2013, the number of hospitalizations for orbital cellulitis ranged from 1,349 to 1,574, but declined to 865 in 2014. From 2008 to 2015, the number of surgeries ranged from 103 to 154. For children (n = 3,041), age, ophthalmologic comorbidity, and conjunctival edema were significantly associated with surgery, whereas for adults (n = 7,961), male gender, private insurance, optic neuritis, and cranial nerves III/VI/VI palsy were associated with surgery.Although the number of inpatient hospitalizations for orbital cellulitis has markedly declined, the number of surgeries for orbital cellulitis has remained fairly stable, leading to an observed higher proportion of hospitalized patients undergoing surgery. Future directions include extending the time frame to the present day to assess current rates of hospitalization and surgery. Knowledge of surgical trends and patient- and hospital-level characteristics associated with surgery may help improve management guidelines for and understanding of this vision-threatening disease.NA Laryngoscope, 130:567-574, 2020.
View details for DOI 10.1002/lary.28050
View details for Web of Science ID 000514225500006
View details for PubMedID 31050824
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC6825874
-
Occlusion and Functional Outcomes after Complete Temporomandibular Joint Resection with Soft Tissue Reconstruction
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
2020; 162 (4): 589-592
Abstract
Reconstructive outcomes after complete temporomandibular joint (TMJ) resection, including the condyle and glenoid fossa bone, are poorly defined in the literature. We described our technique and reviewed occlusion and functional outcomes of 6 consecutive patients undergoing complete TMJ resection and reconstruction with anterolateral thigh free tissue transfer and intermaxillary fixation with elastic bands for 6 to 8 weeks. At median follow-up of 14 months, median Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire score was 32 (range, 4-38), indicating mild to moderate impairment. Subjective occlusion was normal in 4 of 6 patients. Premature occlusal contact was seen in 2 of 6 patients. Maximal interincisor distance and horizontal mandibular shift with jaw abduction ranged from 29 to 40 mm and 5 to 8 mm, respectively. Four of 6 tolerated regular diets while 2 adhered to mechanical soft diets; no patients were feeding tube dependent. Soft tissue-only reconstruction after complete TMJ resection resulted in good subjective and objective occlusion in 4 of 6 patients and no cases of severe functional impairment.
View details for DOI 10.1177/0194599819901144
View details for Web of Science ID 000508788800001
View details for PubMedID 31959049
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8970301
-
Diagnosing Tongue Base Obstruction in Pierre Robin Sequence Infants: Sleep vs Awake Endoscopy
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL
2018; 55 (5): 692-696
Abstract
To investigate whether awake endoscopy can diagnose base-of-tongue obstruction as reliably as sleep endoscopy in infants with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS).The study was retrospective with the clinicians blinded to patient identity. Endoscopy findings were assessed and measured by the performing pediatric otolaryngologist.Tertiary care children's hospital.All infants with PRS managed between January 2005 and July 2015 were included. There were 141 patients, of which 35 underwent both awake endoscopy (AE) and drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).Bedside AE and DISE in the operating room.Presence of moderate or severe base-of-tongue collapse was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio of AE findings as well as intertest differences between AE and DISE were calculated.AE had 50.0% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 27.2%-72.8%) and 86.7% specificity (95% CI 59.5%-98.3%) for detecting base-of-tongue obstruction compared to DISE; false negative rate was 50.0% (n = 10). Positive likelihood ratio was 3.75 (CI 0.96-14.65). Compared to AE, DISE demonstrated significantly more cases of base-of-tongue obstruction ( P = .039).Bedside AE has low sensitivity for detecting base-of-tongue collapse in infants with PRS. Because of the substantial false negative rate, AE may not be a reliable diagnostic modality for ruling out base-of-tongue obstruction in this susceptible population. DISE may be indicated in high-risk patients to avoid underdiagnosing upper airway obstruction.
View details for DOI 10.1177/1055665618756706
View details for Web of Science ID 000430340500008
View details for PubMedID 29446988
-
Vascular applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
2017; 66 (1): 266-274
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging is a powerful noninvasive modality offering numerous potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications in vascular medicine. CEUS imaging uses microbubble contrast agents composed of an encapsulating shell surrounding a gaseous core. These microbubbles act as nearly perfect intravascular reflectors of ultrasound energy and may be used to enhance the overall contrast and quality of ultrasound images. The purpose of this narrative review is to survey the current literature regarding CEUS imaging and discuss its diagnostic and therapeutic roles in current vascular and selected nonvascular applications.The PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched until July 2016 using the PubMed and Ovid Web-based search engines. The search terms used included contrast-enhanced, microbubble, ultrasound, carotid, aneurysm, and arterial.The diagnostic and therapeutic utility of CEUS imaging has grown exponentially, particularly in the realms of extracranial carotid arterial disease, aortic disease, and peripheral arterial disease. Studies have demonstrated that CEUS imaging is diagnostically superior to conventional ultrasound imaging in identifying vessel irregularities and measuring neovascularization to assess plaque vulnerability and end-muscle perfusion. Groups have begun to use microbubbles as agents in therapeutic applications for targeted drug and gene therapy delivery as well as for the enhancement of sonothrombolysis.The emerging technology of microbubbles and CEUS imaging holds considerable promise for cardiovascular medicine and cancer therapy given its diagnostic and therapeutic utility. Overall, with proper training and credentialing of technicians, the clinical implications are innumerable as microbubble technology is rapidly bursting onto the scene of cardiovascular medicine.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.133
View details for Web of Science ID 000405546300034
View details for PubMedID 28390769
-
Upper Airway Stimulation for OSA: Early Adherence and Outcome Results of One Center
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD. 2016: 188-193
Abstract
To review outcome measures and objective adherence data for patients treated with hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Case series with chart review.Academic sleep medicine center.The first 20 implanted patients to complete postoperative sleep laboratory testing were assessed. All patients had moderate to severe OSA, were unable to adhere to positive pressure therapy, and met previously published inclusion criteria for the commercially available implantable HNS system. Data included demographics, body mass index (BMI), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS), nightly hours of device usage, and procedure- and therapy-related complications.Mean age was 64.8 ± 12.0 years, with 50% female. Mean BMI was unchanged postoperatively (26.5 ± 4.2 to 26.8 ± 4.5 kg/m(2); P > .05). Mean AHI (33.3 ± 13.0 to 5.1 ± 4.3; P < .0001) and mean ESS (10.3 ± 5.2 to 6.0 ± 4.4; P < .01) decreased significantly. Seventy percent (14/20) of patients achieved a treatment AHI <5, 85% (17/20) an AHI <10, and 95% (19/20) an AHI <15. Average stimulation amplitude was 1.89 ± 0.50 V after titration. Adherence monitoring via device interrogation showed high rates of voluntary device use (mean 7.0 ± 2.2 h/night).For a clinical and anatomical subset of patients with OSA, HNS therapy is associated with good objective adherence, low morbidity, and improved OSA outcome measures. Early results at one institution suggest that HNS therapy can be implemented successfully into routine clinical practice, outside of a trial setting.
View details for DOI 10.1177/0194599816636619
View details for Web of Science ID 000380019100033
View details for PubMedID 26980908
-
Characteristics of sleep apnea in infants with Pierre-Robin sequence: Is there improvement with advancing age?
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
2015; 79 (12): 2059-2067
Abstract
To investigate changes in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA) in infants with Pierre-Robin sequence (PRS) with advancing age and after mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO).Charts from 141 infants with PRS that presented to our tertiary-care children's hospital between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-five patients received a polysomnogram (PSG) prior to surgical intervention. Linear regression was utilized to compare age at pre-operative PSG with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI), and central apnea index (CAI). We then analyzed a subset of 9 patients who underwent MDO with pre- and post-operative PSGs. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to examine differences in pre- and post-operative OSA and CSA scores.Forty-five patients received pre-operative PSGs. Of these, 80.0% demonstrated severe sleep apnea (AHI≥10), 68.9% demonstrated severe obstructive sleep apnea (OAHI≥10), and 55.6% demonstrated central sleep apnea (CAI≥1). There was no significant pattern of decrease in AHI, OAHI, and CAI with increased age up to 1 year. Among the 9 patients who underwent MDO with pre- and post-operative PSGs, significant reductions in AHI, OAHI, CAI, and percentage of total sleep time with arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) <90% and significant increases in SaO2 nadir were identified after MDO.Contrary to previously examined literature in non-PRS patients, we did not find a decreased severity of central or obstructive sleep apnea with advancing age. Infants with PRS who underwent MDO demonstrated significant decreases in both obstructive and central apnea indices.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.09.014
View details for Web of Science ID 000367411300017
View details for PubMedID 26429600
-
Teaching the pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty: The sticky note method
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
2015; 79 (11): 1905-1908
Abstract
To demonstrate a cost-effective, quick, and easily reproducible three-dimensional sticky note model to enhance the understanding and conceptualization of the geometry and steps of the pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty.The method involves making specified incisions and rearrangements of readily available components, including disposable clear plastic cups, yellow and pink sticky notes, and white paper. Once assembly is complete, further incisions and remodeling are performed to simulate a pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty.The cost of the materials to make one model was $0.94. Average construction time was less than 10 min.This three-dimensional model is an efficient, interactive, and simple visual aid to teach surgical trainees the geometry and steps of the pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.08.042
View details for Web of Science ID 000363069700024
View details for PubMedID 26375931
- Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treated with Combination Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation and Oral Appliance Therapy Journal of Dental Sleep Medicine 2015
-
Computational analysis to predict false-lumen perfusion and outcome of type B aortic dissection
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
2014; 148 (4): 1756-1758
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.065
View details for Web of Science ID 000342896200108
View details for PubMedID 25109756
-
Role of Computational Modeling in Thoracic Aortic Pathology: A Review
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY
2014; 29 (5): 653-662
Abstract
Thoracic aortic diseases are life-threatening conditions causing significant mortality and morbidity despite advances in diagnostic and surgical treatments. Computational methods combined with imaging techniques provide quantitative information of disease progression, which may improve clinical treatments and therapeutic strategies for clinical practice. Since hemodynamic and wall mechanics play important roles in the natural history and progression of aortic diseases, we reviewed the potential application of computational modeling of the thoracic aorta. We placed emphasis on the clinical relevance of these techniques for the assessment of aortic dissection, thoracic aortic aneurysm, and aortic coarctation. Current clinical guidelines and treatment are also described.
View details for DOI 10.1111/jocs.12413
View details for Web of Science ID 000342851100016
View details for PubMedID 25080972
-
Predicting Outcome of Aortic Dissection with Patent False Lumen by Computational Flow Analysis
CARDIOVASCULAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
2014; 5 (2): 176-188
View details for DOI 10.1007/s13239-014-0182-x
View details for Web of Science ID 000209839700005