- Changing Americans' Attitudes about Immigration: Using Moral Framing to Bolster Factual Arguments ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE 2022; 700 (1): 73-85
Pragmatic bias impedes women's access to political leadership.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
1800; 119 (6)
Progress toward gender equality is thwarted by the underrepresentation of women in political leadership, even as most Americans report they would vote for women candidates. Here, we hypothesize that women candidates are often disadvantaged by pragmatic bias, a tendency to withhold support for members of groups for whom success is perceived to be difficult or impossible to achieve. Across six studies (N = 7,895), we test whether pragmatic bias impedes women's access to a highly significant political leadership position-the US presidency. In two surveys, 2020 Democratic primary voters perceived women candidates to be less electable, and these beliefs were correlated with lower intentions to vote for women candidates (Studies 1 and 2). Voters identified many reasons women would be less electable than men, including others' unwillingness to vote for women, biased media coverage, and higher requirements to prove themselves. We next tested interventions to reduce pragmatic bias. Merely correcting misperceptions of Americans' reported readiness for a woman president did not increase intentions to vote for a woman (Study 3). However, across three experiments (including one preregistered on a nationally representative sample), presenting evidence that women earn as much support as men in US general elections increased Democratic primary voters' intentions to vote for women presidential candidates, an effect driven by heightened perceptions of these candidates' electability (Studies 4 to 6). These findings highlight that social change efforts can be thwarted by people's sense of what is possible, but this may be overcome by credibly signaling others' willingness to act collectively.
View details for DOI 10.1073/pnas.2112616119
View details for PubMedID 35105805
- Inclusion reduces political prejudice JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2021; 95
A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP
2020; 120 (1): 73–96
View details for Web of Science ID 000528281400004
The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.
Psychonomic bulletin & review
Despite the increasing popularity of Bayesian inference in empirical research, few practical guidelines provide detailed recommendations for how to apply Bayesian procedures and interpret the results. Here we offer specific guidelines for four different stages of Bayesian statistical reasoning in a research setting: planning the analysis, executing the analysis, interpreting the results, and reporting the results. The guidelines for each stage are illustrated with a running example. Although the guidelines are geared towards analyses performed with the open-source statistical software JASP, most guidelines extend to Bayesian inference in general.
View details for DOI 10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5
View details for PubMedID 33037582
- The Effect of Ideological Identification on the Endorsement of Moral Values Depends on the Target Group PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN 2019; 45 (6): 851–63
- Morally Reframed Arguments Can Affect Support for Political Candidates SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE 2018; 9 (8): 917–24