Dr. Wollast is a postdoctoral researcher in psychology at the Stanford Psychophysiology Laboratory. He earned his PhD from Université libre de Bruxelles in Belgium. He has published numerous first-authored scientific articles in leading international journals and collaborated with highly regarded experts from America, Europe, and Asia. Dr. Wollast won the prestigious Belgian American Educational Foundation Award to conduct research on emotion and emotion regulation at Stanford University. His primary research focuses on body image, self-compassion, and mindfulness through various lenses, including culture, gender, and mental health. Besides this main focus, Dr. Wollast studies dropout and perseverance in doctoral studies, and he is involved in several studies on collective action, group polarization, and ideological extremism. Currently, he is leading many projects related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including large-scale studies conducted in more than 100 countries and translated into 30 languages.
Honors & Awards
Belgian American Educational Foundation Award, BAEF (2020)
Ph.D., Université libre de Bruxelles, Psychology (2018)
Master, Université libre de Bruxelles, Social and Cross-cultural Psychology (2014)
Bachelor, Université libre de Bruxelles, Psychological and Educational Sciences (2012)
Does Self-Objectification Entail an Opposition Between Appearance and Competence? The Likert Version of the Self-Objectification Questionnaire (LSOQ)
2021; 61 (1): 33–45
We propose a new method to test the reliability of Fredrickson et al.'s self-objectification questionnaire (SOQ). This scale being based on a ranking, traditional reliability estimates are inappropriate. Based on generalizability theory, we suggest to compute the reliability of each subset of questions related to physical appearance vs. physical competence separately in order to average them. We applied this method to a sample of female US undergraduates (n = 395) and evidenced that the reliability of the scale is very low (corrected Cronbach's alpha = .31). We also noted that a large proportion of the sample (32%) failed to complete the scale correctly. In a second study (n = 93), we propose a Likert adaptation of the scale and show that the two dimensions of the SOQ are independent. In Study 3 (n = 195), we confirm results of Study 2 and demonstrate that the general structure of the Likert version has satisfactory model fit statistics. These observations lead us to discourage the use of the original version of the SOQ and rely on the Likert version of the Self-Objectification Questionnaire (LSOQ, see appendix).
View details for DOI 10.5334/pb.481
View details for Web of Science ID 000616586800001
View details for PubMedID 33614104
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC7880009
- Heterosexual University Students' Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Couples and Parents Across Seven European Countries SEXUALITY RESEARCH AND SOCIAL POLICY 2020
- How Self-Compassion Moderates the Relation Between Body Surveillance and Body Shame Among Men and Women MINDFULNESS 2020; 11 (10): 2298–2313
- How cultural orientation and self-compassion shape objectified body consciousness for women from America, Belgium, Russia, and Thailand SELF AND IDENTITY 2020
Two Preregistered Direct Replications of "Objects Don't Object: Evidence That Self-Objectification Disrupts Women's Social Activism"
2020; 31 (2): 214–23
Self-objectification has been claimed to induce numerous detrimental consequences for women at the individual level (e.g., sexual dysfunction, depression, eating disorders). Additionally, at the collective level, it has been proposed that self-objectified women might themselves contribute to the maintenance of the patriarchal status quo, for instance, by participating less in collective action. In 2013, Calogero found a negative link between self-objectification and collective action, which was mediated by the adoption of gender-specific system justification. Here, we report two preregistered direct replications (PDRs) of Calogero's original study. We conducted these PDRs after three failures to replicate the positive relation between self-objectification and gender-specific system-justification belief in correlational studies. Results of the two PDRs, in which we used a Bayesian approach, supported the null hypothesis. This work has important theoretical implications because it challenges the role attributed to self-objectified women in the maintenance of patriarchy.
View details for DOI 10.1177/0956797619896273
View details for Web of Science ID 000508793800001
View details for PubMedID 31961774
- An Initial Test of the Cosmetics Dehumanization Hypothesis: Heavy Makeup Diminishes Attributions of Humanness-Related Traits to Women SEX ROLES 2020; 83 (5-6): 315–27
- Sex is power belief and women's mental health: The mediating roles of self-objectification and sexual subjectivity EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2020; 50 (5): 1017–31
Perspectives on resilience: Personality Trait or Skill?
European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
2020; 4 (2)
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.ejtd.2018.07.002
Percevoir son corps à travers le regard d’autrui : une revue de la littérature sur l’auto-objectification
2020; 120 (3)
View details for DOI 10.3917/anpsy1.203.0321
How self-compassion moderates the effect of body surveillance on subjective happiness and depression among women
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
2019; 60 (5): 464–72
According to objectification theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997), being treated as an object leads women to engage in self-objectification, which in turn increases body surveillance and body shame as well as impairs mental health. However, very little is known about what factors could act as buffers against the detrimental consequences of self-objectification. This paper seeks to understand the role of self-compassion (the ability to kindly accept oneself or show self-directed kindness while suffering) in the perception that women have of their own bodies. Results indicate that self-compassion moderated the effect of body surveillance on depression and happiness separately among women. More specifically, for women low in self-compassion, body surveillance was negatively associated with happiness, which was explained by increased depression. In sum, our results indicate that self-compassion protects against the detrimental consequences of body surveillance.
View details for DOI 10.1111/sjop.12553
View details for Web of Science ID 000483824900007
View details for PubMedID 31148181
- Why Is Sexualization Dehumanizing? The Effects of Posture Suggestiveness and Revealing Clothing on Dehumanization SAGE OPEN 2019; 9 (1)
- How Sexual Objectification Generates Dehumanization in Western and Eastern Cultures A Comparison Between Belgiumand Thailand SWISS JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2018; 77 (2): 69–82
- Who are the doctoral students who drop out? Factors associated with the rate of doctoral degree completion in universities International Journal of Higher Education 2018; 7 (4)
- 10.31234/osf.io/24c9b Cognitions, attitudes et comportements intergroupes 2018
- La compassion pour soi-même peut-elle protéger des conséquences néfastes liées à une image corporelle négative ? Sextant 2018; 35