
Bio
Dr. Neha Patel is a triple board-certified, fellowship-trained medical oncologist with Stanford Health Care. She is also a clinical assistant professor in the Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology at Stanford University School of Medicine.
Dr. Patel provides expert, personalized care for patients with both common and rare cancers and specializes in treating patients with genitourinary cancer. She is deeply committed to delivering comprehensive, patient-centered oncology services, with an emphasis on helping individuals and their families understand their diagnosis and navigate treatment options with confidence and clarity.
Her research focuses on designing and implementing system-level interventions to advance equitable, high-value cancer care. Dr. Patel is particularly passionate about integrating oncology and palliative (symptom-relieving) care—creating collaborative models that improve patient outcomes, elevate the quality of life, and enhance the overall care experience.
Known for her compassionate and relational approach, Dr. Patel builds strong, trusting partnerships with the patients and families she serves. She prioritizes care that aligns with each individual’s values, preferences, and goals, with the aim of achieving the best possible quality of life and longevity.
Clinical Focus
- Medical Oncology
Boards, Advisory Committees, Professional Organizations
-
Member, Society of Clinical Oncology (2021 - Present)
-
Member, Association of Veterans Affairs Hematology/Oncology (2025 - Present)
-
Member, Southwest Oncology Group (2023 - Present)
Professional Education
-
Board Certification: American Board of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology (2022)
-
Board Certification: American Board of Internal Medicine, Hematology (2022)
-
Board Certification: American Board of Internal Medicine, Internal Medicine (2019)
-
Fellowship: University of California Irvine Medical Center (2022) CA
-
Residency: Olive View - UCLA Medical Center (2019) CA
-
Medical Education: University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine (2016) FL
Graduate and Fellowship Programs
-
Hematology (Fellowship Program)
-
Oncology (Fellowship Program)
All Publications
-
Abdominal pain and cirrhosis at diagnosis of hemochromatosis: Analysis of 219 referred probands with HFE p.C282Y homozygosity and a literature review.
PloS one
2021; 16 (12): e0261690
Abstract
In hemochromatosis, causes of abdominal pain and its associations with cirrhosis are poorly understood.We retrospectively compared characteristics of referred hemochromatosis probands with HFE p.C282Y homozygosity with/without biopsy-proven cirrhosis: sex, age, diabetes, heavy alcohol consumption, abdominal pain/tenderness, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic viral hepatitis, ascites, transferrin saturation (TS), serum ferritin (SF), and iron removed by phlebotomy (QFe). We performed logistic regression on cirrhosis using characteristics identified in univariate comparisons. We performed computerized and manual searches to identify hemochromatosis case series and compiled prevalence data on cirrhosis and abdominal pain and causes of abdominal pain.Of 219 probands, 57.1% were men. Mean age was 48±13 y. In 22 probands with cirrhosis, proportions of men, mean age, prevalences of heavy alcohol consumption, abdominal pain, abdominal tenderness, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and chronic viral hepatitis, and median TS, SF, and QFe were significantly greater than in probands without cirrhosis. Regression analysis revealed three associations with cirrhosis: abdominal pain (p = 0.0292; odds ratio 9.8 (95% CI: 1.2, 76.9)); chronic viral hepatitis (p = 0.0153; 11.5 (95% CI: 1.6, 83.3)); and QFe (p = 0.0009; 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.3)). Of eight probands with abdominal pain, five had cirrhosis and four had diabetes. One proband each with abdominal pain had heavy alcohol consumption, chronic viral hepatitis B, hepatic sarcoidosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and chronic cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and sigmoid diverticulitis. Abdominal pain was alleviated after phlebotomy alone in four probands. In 12 previous reports (1935-2011), there was a negative correlation of cirrhosis prevalence and publication year (p = 0.0033). In 11 previous reports (1935-1996), a positive association of abdominal pain prevalence and publication year was not significant (p = 0.0802).Abdominal pain, chronic viral hepatitis, and QFe are significantly associated with cirrhosis in referred hemochromatosis probands with HFE p.C282Y homozygosity. Iron-related and non-iron-related factors contribute to the occurrence of abdominal pain.
View details for DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0261690
View details for PubMedID 34932603
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8691644
-
Potential role for LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of 5 or more radioresistant melanoma brain metastases.
Journal of neurosurgery
2015; 123 (5): 1261-7
Abstract
Linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a treatment option for patients with melanoma in whom brain metastases have developed. Very limited data are available on treating patients with ≥5 lesions. The authors sought to determine the effectiveness of SRS in patients with ≥5 melanoma brain metastases.A retrospective analysis of metastatic melanoma treated with SRS in a single treatment session for ≥5 lesions was performed. Magnetic resonance imaging studies were reviewed post-SRS to evaluate local control (LC). Disease progression on imaging was defined using the 2009 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Survival curves were calculated from the date of brain metastases diagnosis or the date of SRS by using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. Univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA and MVA, respectively) were performed using the Cox proportional-hazards model.The authors identified 149 metastatic brain lesions treated in 28 patients. The median patient age was 60.5 years (range 38-83 years), and the majority of patients (24 [85.7%]) had extracranial metastases. Four patients (14.3%) had received previous whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and 11 (39.3%) had undergone previous SRS. The median planning target volume (PTV) was 0.34 cm3 (range 0.01-12.5 cm3). Median follow-up was 6.3 months (range 1-46 months). At the time of treatment, 7% of patients were categorized as recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Class I, 89% as RPA Class II, and 4% as RPA Class III. The rate of local failure was 11.4%. Kaplan-Meier LC estimates at 6 and 12 months were 91.3% and 82.2%, respectively. A PTV volume≥0.34 cm3 was a significant predictor of local failure on UVA (HR 16.1, 95% CI 3.2-292.6, p<0.0001) and MVA (HR 14.8, 95% CI 3.0-268.5, p=0.0002). Sixteen patients (57.1%) were noted to have distant failure in the brain with a median time to failure of 3 months (range 1-15 months). Nine patients with distant failures received WBRT, and 7 received additional SRS. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 and 7.6 months from the date of brain metastases diagnosis and the date of SRS, respectively. The KM OS estimates at 6 and 12 months were 57.8% and 28.2%, respectively, from the time of SRS treatment. The RPA class was a significant predictor of KM OS estimates from the date of treatment (p=0.02). Patients who did not receive WBRT after SRS treatment had decreased OS on MVA (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-12.0, p=0.03), and patients who did not receive WBRT prior to SRS had improved OS (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.53, p=0.007).Stereotactic radiosurgery for ≥5 lesions appears to be effective for selected patients with metastatic melanoma, offering excellent LC. This is particularly important for patients as new targeted systemic agents are improving outcomes but still have limited efficacy within the central nervous system.
View details for DOI 10.3171/2014.12.JNS141919
View details for PubMedID 26140482
-
Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to the post-operative cavity for radioresistant and radiosensitive brain metastases.
Journal of neuro-oncology
2014; 118 (1): 179-86
Abstract
Following surgical resection for brain metastases, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) has been used as an alternative to single dose treatment for large cavities and to reduce risks of late toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with FSRT to the post-operative bed for both radioresistant and radiosensitive brain metastases. Between December 2009 and May 2013 a total of 65 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases were treated with resection followed by FSRT. Patients were treated to a total dose of 20-30 Gy in five fractions. Median planning target volume (PTV) was 16.88 cm(3) (range 4.87-128.43 cm(3)). The median follow-up for all patients was 8.5 months (range 1.1-28.6 months) with a median of 12.9 months for living patients. One and two year Kaplan-Meier estimates of local control were 87.0 and 70.0 %, respectively. Local control at 1 year was 85.6 and 88.0% for radioresistant and radiosensitive tumors, respectively (p = 0.44). A PTV ≥17 cm(3), was associated with local failure, HR 8.63 ((1.44-164.78); p = 0.02). One and two year distant control rates were 50.9 and 46.2%, respectively with six patients (9.2%) experiencing leptomeningeal disease. OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 65.2 and 47.5%, respectively. Survival was significantly associated with recursive partitioning analysis class (p = 0.001) and graded prognostic assessment score (p = 0.005). One case of radionecrosis was noted on follow-up imaging. FSRT in five fractions offers excellent local control in both radiosensitive and radioresistant tumors with minimal toxicity.
View details for DOI 10.1007/s11060-014-1417-2
View details for PubMedID 24604750
- USF International Partners Thailand Web Page Web. Tampa, FL. 2011
-
Levetiracetam for stiff-person syndrome: report of 2 patients.
Clinical neuropharmacology
2008; 31 (5): 301-2
Abstract
We report 2 patients with stiff-person syndrome whose spasms were greatly relieved by levetiracetam (Keppra).
View details for DOI 10.1097/WNF.0b013e31815f8df0
View details for PubMedID 18836351