Barton Thompson
Robert E. Paradise Professor of Natural Resources Law, Professor of Environmental Social Sciences and Senior Fellow at the Woods Institute for the Environment
Stanford Law School
Bio
A global expert on water and natural resources, Barton “Buzz” Thompson focuses on how to improve resource management through legal, institutional, and technological innovation. He was the founding Perry L. McCarty Director of the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, where he remains a Senior Fellow and directs the Water in the West program. He also has been a Senior Fellow (by courtesy) at Stanford’s Freeman-Spogli Institute for International Studies, and a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution. He founded the law school’s Environmental and Natural Resources Program. He also is a faculty member in Stanford’s Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources (E-IPER).
Professor Thompson served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. Wyoming, an interstate water dispute involving the Yellowstone River system. He also is a former member of the Science Advisory Board of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. He chairs the boards of the Resources Legacy Fund and the Stanford Habitat Conservation Board, is a California trustee of The Nature Conservancy, and is a board member of the American Farmland Trust, the Sonoran Institute, and the Santa Lucia Conservancy.
Professor Thompson is of counsel to the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers, where he specializes in water resources and was a partner prior to joining Stanford Law School. He also serves as an advisor to a major impact investment fund. He was a law clerk to Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist ’52 (BA ’48, MA ’48) of the U.S. Supreme Court and Judge Joseph T. Sneed of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Academic Appointments
-
Professor, Stanford Law School
-
Senior Fellow, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment
-
Professor, Environmental Social Sciences
-
Founding Perry L. McCarty Director, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment
Program Affiliations
-
Public Policy
2024-25 Courses
- Natural Resources Law and Policy
LAW 2506 (Aut) - Property
LAW 217 (Spr) - The Business of Water
CEE 273B (Aut) - The Business of Water
LAW 2508 (Aut) -
Independent Studies (5)
- Directed Individual Study in Earth Systems
EARTHSYS 297 (Aut, Win, Spr, Sum) - Directed Reading in Environment and Resources
ENVRES 398 (Aut, Win, Spr, Sum) - Directed Research
EARTHSYS 250 (Aut, Win, Spr, Sum) - Directed Research in Environment and Resources
ENVRES 399 (Aut, Win, Spr, Sum) - Honors Program in Earth Systems
EARTHSYS 199 (Aut, Win, Spr, Sum)
- Directed Individual Study in Earth Systems
-
Prior Year Courses
2023-24 Courses
- Externship, Special Circumstances
LAW 884 (Aut) - Graduate Practicum in Environment and Resources
ENVRES 270 (Win) - Property
LAW 217 (Spr) - The Business of Water
CEE 273B (Win) - The Business of Water
LAW 2508 (Win) - Water Law
LAW 2519 (Win)
2022-23 Courses
- Environmental Law Workshop
LAW 2524 (Win) - Environmental Law and Policy
LAW 2504 (Spr) - Natural Resources Law and Policy
LAW 2506 (Win) - Policy Practicum: Integrating Water and Land Use Policy in the West: The Missing Link
LAW 808T (Aut) - Policy Practicum: Integrating Water and Land Use Policy in the West: The Missing Link
SUSTAIN 328 (Aut) - The Business of Water
CEE 273B (Win) - The Business of Water
LAW 2508 (Win)
2021-22 Courses
- Environmental Justice Workshop
LAW 2524 (Aut) - Property
LAW 217 (Spr) - The Business of Water
CEE 273B (Win) - The Business of Water
LAW 2508 (Win) - Water Law
LAW 2519 (Win)
- Externship, Special Circumstances
Stanford Advisees
-
Julia Sharapi -
Doctoral Dissertation Co-Advisor (AC)
Keala Carter, Eeshan Chaturvedi
All Publications
-
Storing and managing water for the environment is more efficient than mimicking natural flows.
Nature communications
2024; 15 (1): 5462
Abstract
Dams and reservoirs are often needed to provide environmental water and maintain suitable water temperatures for downstream ecosystems. Here, we evaluate if water allocated to the environment, with storage to manage it, might allow environmental water to more reliably meet ecosystem objectives than a proportion of natural flow. We use a priority-based water balance operations model and a reservoir temperature model to evaluate 1) pass-through of a portion of reservoir inflow versus 2) allocating a portion of storage capacity and inflow for downstream flow and stream temperature objectives. We compare trade-offs to other senior and junior priority water demands. In many months, pass-through flows exceed the volumes needed to meet environmental demands. Storage provides the ability to manage release timing to use water efficiently for environmental benefit, with a co-benefit of increasing reservoir storage to protect cold-water at depth in the reservoir.
View details for DOI 10.1038/s41467-024-49770-4
View details for PubMedID 38937466
View details for PubMedCentralID 7035475
-
Socio-hydrological impacts of rate design on water affordability during drought
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
2023; 18 (12)
View details for DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ad0994
View details for Web of Science ID 001100898400001
-
CLIMATE CHANGE CHALLENGES FOR LAND CONSERVATION: RETHINKING CONSERVATION EASEMENTS, STRATEGIES, AND TOOLS
DENVER LAW REVIEW
2018; 95 (3): 727–79
View details for Web of Science ID 000438454500005
-
Pwehe Ke Kai a"o H"ena: Creating State Law based on Customary Indigenous Norms of Coastal Management
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES
2017; 30 (1): 31-46
View details for DOI 10.1080/08941920.2016.1196406
View details for Web of Science ID 000386679900004
-
Barriers to Innovation in Urban Wastewater Utilities: Attitudes of Managers in California
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
2016; 57 (6): 1204-1216
Abstract
In many regions of the world, urban water systems will need to transition into fundamentally different forms to address current stressors and meet impending challenges-faster innovation will need to be part of these transitions. To assess the innovation deficit in urban water organizations and to identify means for supporting innovation, we surveyed wastewater utility managers in California. Our results reveal insights about the attitudes towards innovation among decision makers, and how perceptions at the level of individual managers might create disincentives for experimentation. Although managers reported feeling relatively unhindered organizationally, they also spend less time on innovation than they feel they should. The most frequently reported barriers to innovation included cost and financing; risk and risk aversion; and regulatory compliance. Considering these results in the context of prior research on innovation systems, we conclude that collective action may be required to address underinvestment in innovation.
View details for DOI 10.1007/s00267-016-0685-3
View details for Web of Science ID 000374831700005
View details for PubMedID 26993816
-
Assessment of human-natural system characteristics influencing global freshwater supply vulnerability
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
2015; 10 (10)
View details for DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104014
View details for Web of Science ID 000367180300019
-
Adapting Conservation Easements to Climate Change
CONSERVATION LETTERS
2015; 8 (1): 68-76
View details for DOI 10.1111/conl.12099
View details for Web of Science ID 000350544200008
-
The Innovation Deficit in Urban Water: The Need for an Integrated Perspective on Institutions, Organizations, and Technology
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
2013; 30 (8): 395-408
View details for DOI 10.1089/ees.2012.0427
View details for Web of Science ID 000323206400002
-
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING, DOMINANT-USE ZONES, AND USER RIGHTS: A NEW ERA IN OCEAN GOVERNANCE
7th William R and Lenore Mote International Symposium in Fisheries Ecology
ROSENSTIEL SCH MAR ATMOS SCI. 2010: 273–85
View details for Web of Science ID 000278021900009
-
Institutional incentives for managing the landscape: Inducing cooperation for the production of ecosystem services
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
2007; 64 (2): 333-343
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.012
View details for Web of Science ID 000252264600011
-
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist: Prizing people, place, and history
STANFORD LAW REVIEW
2006; 58 (6): 1695-1703
View details for Web of Science ID 000238526100008
-
Conservative environmental thought: The Bush administration and environmental policy
Annual Meeting of the Association-of-American-Law-Schools
UNIV CALIFORNIA BERKELEY SCH LAW. 2005: 307–47
View details for Web of Science ID 000232707900005
-
The continuing innovation of citizen enforcement
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW
2000: 185-236
View details for Web of Science ID 000088776000008
-
People or prairie chickens: The uncertain search for optimal biodiversity
STANFORD LAW REVIEW
1999; 51 (5): 1127-1185
View details for Web of Science ID 000080456300004
-
Endangered Species Act: A case study in takings & incentives
STANFORD LAW REVIEW
1997; 49 (2): 305-380
View details for Web of Science ID A1997WT67700003
-
JUDICIAL TAKINGS
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW
1990; 76 (8): 1449-1544
View details for Web of Science ID A1990EK95300001