Glenn Carroll
Adams Distinguished Professor of Management and Professor, by courtesy, of Sociology
Organizational Behavior
Web page: https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/facultyprofiles/biomain.asp?id=11395379
Academic Appointments
-
Professor, Organizational Behavior
-
Professor (By courtesy), Sociology
2024-25 Courses
- Designing Social Research
OB 670 (Aut) -
Independent Studies (4)
- Doctoral Practicum in Research
OB 699 (Aut, Win, Spr, Sum) - Doctoral Practicum in Teaching
OB 698 (Aut, Win, Spr, Sum) - Individual Research
GSBGEN 390 (Aut, Win, Spr) - PhD Directed Reading
ACCT 691, FINANCE 691, MGTECON 691, MKTG 691, OB 691, OIT 691, POLECON 691 (Aut, Win, Spr, Sum)
- Doctoral Practicum in Research
-
Prior Year Courses
2023-24 Courses
- Designing Social Research
OB 670 (Aut) - Leading Through Culture
OB 518 (Win)
2022-23 Courses
- Designing Social Research
OB 670 (Aut) - Leading Through Culture
OB 518 (Win)
2021-22 Courses
- Designing Social Research
OB 670 (Aut) - Leading Through Culture
OB 518 (Aut, Win) - Theoretical Analysis and Research Design
SOC 372 (Aut)
- Designing Social Research
Stanford Advisees
-
Doctoral Dissertation Reader (AC)
Seyeon Kim -
Doctoral Dissertation Advisor (AC)
Jiwon Byun
All Publications
-
DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN COSMOPOLITANS AND OMNIVORES IN ORGANIZATIONAL AUDIENCES
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT DISCOVERIES
2023; 9 (4): 549-577
View details for DOI 10.5465/amd.2022.0025
View details for Web of Science ID 001164857000008
-
Who Made This? Algorithms and Authorship Credit.
Personality & social psychology bulletin
2023: 1461672221149815
Abstract
Producers and creators often receive assistance with work from other people. Increasingly, algorithms can provide similar assistance. When algorithms assist or augment producers, does this change individuals' willingness to assign credit to those producers? Across four studies spanning several domains (e.g., painting, construction, sports analytics, and entrepreneurship), we find evidence that producers receive more credit for work when they are assisted by algorithms, compared with humans. We also find that individuals assume algorithmic assistance requires more producer oversight than human assistance does, a mechanism that explains these higher attributions of credit (Studies 1-3). The greater credit individuals assign to producers assisted by algorithms (vs. other people) also manifests itself in increased support for those producers' entrepreneurial endeavors (Study 4). As algorithms proliferate, norms of credit and authorship are likely changing, precipitating a variety of economic and social consequences.
View details for DOI 10.1177/01461672221149815
View details for PubMedID 36734213
-
Authenticity among distilleries: Signaling, transparency, and essence
POETICS
2022; 94
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101736
View details for Web of Science ID 000891714500005
-
What's Next? Artists' Music after Grammy Awards
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW
2022
View details for DOI 10.1177/00031224221103257
View details for Web of Science ID 000822452100001
-
Generating Authenticity in Automated Work
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED
2022
Abstract
In an increasing number of domains, people interact with automated agents (such as algorithms, robots, and computers) instead of humans. Across five studies, we explore the role of authenticity in shaping people's reactions to automated agents' work. In doing so, we examine two basic ways to generate authenticity in autonomous technological work: (a) highlighting the human origins of autonomous technologies and (b) anthropomorphizing autonomous technologies, or presenting them with human-like qualities. We find strong evidence that human origin stories generate authenticity, but much less evidence that simple anthropomorphic cues do so to the same degree (Studies 1-3). Simply prompting people to consider human origins can also generate attributions of authenticity (Study 4), which translates into intended and recommended support for automated work (Study 5). We discuss how managers of organizations can implement automated systems in ways that encourage attributions of authenticity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
View details for DOI 10.1037/xap0000365
View details for Web of Science ID 000766314700001
View details for PubMedID 35266793
-
BUSTIN' OUT: THE EVOLUTION OF NOVELTY AND DIVERSITY IN RECORDED MUSIC
GENERATION, RECOGNITION AND LEGITIMATION OF NOVELTY
2022; 77: 51-87
View details for DOI 10.1108/S0733-558X20220000077007
View details for Web of Science ID 000909129600003
-
Grade inflation in restaurant hygiene inspections: Repeated interactions between inspectors and restaurateurs
FOOD POLICY
2020; 97
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101960
View details for Web of Science ID 000598723100008
-
Donn, Vic and tiki bar authenticity
CONSUMPTION MARKETS & CULTURE
2019; 22 (2): 157–82
View details for DOI 10.1080/10253866.2018.1457528
View details for Web of Science ID 000455359000003
-
COMMENT ON "ALGORITHMS AND AUTHENTICITY" BY ARTHUR S. JAGO
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT DISCOVERIES
2019; 5 (1): 95–96
View details for DOI 10.5465/amd.2017.0119
View details for Web of Science ID 000468126300008
-
Acting on authenticity: Individual interpretations and behavioral responses
Review of General Psychology
2019; 23
View details for DOI 10.1177/1089268019829470
-
Organizational, Product and Corporate Demography
HANDBOOK OF POPULATION, 2ND EDITION
2019: 521–53
View details for DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-10910-3_21
View details for Web of Science ID 000510613300025
-
Authenticity and institutional context: Individual preferences in China
Journal of International Consumer Marketing
2019
View details for DOI 10.1080/08961530.2019.1590281
-
COMMENTARY ON "AUTHENTICITY AND THE SHARING ECONOMY"
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT DISCOVERIES
2018; 4 (3): 371–72
View details for DOI 10.5465/amd.2018.0016
View details for Web of Science ID 000455956700008
-
The beholder’s eyes: Audience reactions to organizational self-claims of authenticity
Socius
2018
View details for DOI 10.1177/2378023118793030
-
Disambiguating authenticity: Interpretations of value and appeal.
PloS one
2017; 12 (6): e0179187
Abstract
While shaping aesthetic judgment and choice, socially constructed authenticity takes on some very different meanings among observers, consumers, producers and critics. Using a theoretical framework positing four distinct meanings of socially constructed authenticity-type, moral, craft, and idiosyncratic-we aim to document empirically the unique appeal of each type. We develop predictions about the relationships between attributed authenticity and corresponding increases in the value ascribed to it through: (1) consumer value ratings, (2) willingness to pay, and (3) behavioral choice. We report empirical analyses from a research program of three multi-method studies using (1) archival data from voluntary consumer evaluations of restaurants in an online review system, (2) a university-based behavioral lab experiment, and (3) an online survey-based experiment. Evidence is consistent across the studies and suggests that perceptions of four distinct subtypes of socially constructed authenticity generate increased appeal and value even after controlling for option quality. Findings suggest additional directions for research on authenticity.
View details for DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0179187
View details for PubMedID 28650997
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC5484484
-
Where did "Tex-Mex" come from? The divisive emergence of a social category
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 37
2017; 37: 143–66
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.riob.2017.09.003
View details for Web of Science ID 000419932700008
-
Conflicting Social Codes and Organizations: Hygiene and Authenticity in Consumer Evaluations of Restaurants
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
2014; 60 (10): 2602-2617
View details for DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1903
View details for Web of Science ID 000343421800014
-
Authenticity and Consumer Value Ratings: Empirical Tests from the Restaurant Domain
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
2014; 25 (2): 458-478
View details for DOI 10.1287/orsc.2013.0843
View details for Web of Science ID 000332840000008
-
Challenger Groups, Commercial Organizations, and Policy Enactment: Local Lesbian/Gay Rights Ordinances in the United States from 1972
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
2013; 119 (3): 790-832
View details for DOI 10.1086/673970
View details for Web of Science ID 000334675000007
-
Selection and variation in organizational evolution
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE
2012; 21 (1): 217-243
View details for DOI 10.1093/icc/dtr077
View details for Web of Science ID 000299793500009
-
Restaurant Organizational Forms and Community in the U.S. in 2005
CITY & COMMUNITY
2011; 10 (1): 1-24
View details for DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2010.01350.x
View details for Web of Science ID 000287196500001
-
Niche width and scale in organizational competition: A computational approach
COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL ORGANIZATION THEORY
2010; 16 (1): 29-60
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10588-010-9064-4
View details for Web of Science ID 000280647000002
-
The Social Lives of Products: Analyzing Product Demography for Management Theory and Practice
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS
2010; 4: 157-203
View details for DOI 10.1080/19416521003732362
View details for Web of Science ID 000286416100001
-
The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the US
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 29
2009; 29: 255-282
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.003
View details for Web of Science ID 000276465000013
-
Growing church organizations in diverse US communities, 1890-1926
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
2008; 113 (5): 1272-1315
View details for Web of Science ID 000255427500002
-
Product demography of de novo and de alio firms in the optical disk drive industry, 1983-1999
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
2008; 19 (1): 25-38
View details for DOI 10.1287/orsc.1070.0301
View details for Web of Science ID 000252985400002
-
Simulation modeling in organizational and management research
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW
2007; 32 (4): 1229-1245
View details for Web of Science ID 000249754300011
-
The evolution of inertia
Conference on Organization Ecology
OXFORD UNIV PRESS. 2004: 213–42
View details for Web of Science ID 000189358100009
-
The organizational niche
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY
2003; 21 (4): 309-340
View details for Web of Science ID 000186943700001
-
Cascading organizational change
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
2003; 14 (5): 463-482
View details for Web of Science ID 000185615300001
-
The fog of change: Opacity and asperity in organizations
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY
2003; 48 (3): 399-432
View details for Web of Science ID 000225237000003
-
Shifting gears, shifting niches: Organizational inertia and change in the evolution of the US automobile industry, 1885-1981
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
2003; 14 (3): 264-282
View details for Web of Science ID 000183365400003
-
Come together? The organizational dynamics of post-merger cultural integration
SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY
2002; 10 (5-7): 349-368
View details for Web of Science ID 000183027300006
-
THEORY BUILDING AND CHEAP TALK ABOUT LEGITIMATION - REPLY
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW
1995; 60 (4): 539-544
View details for Web of Science ID A1995RN19000006
-
HOW INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS AFFECTED THE ORGANIZATION OF EARLY UNITED-STATES TELEPHONY
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION
1993; 9 (1): 98-126
View details for Web of Science ID A1993LB05500005
-
THE LIABILITY OF NEWNESS - AGE DEPENDENCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL DEATH RATES
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW
1983; 48 (5): 692-710
View details for Web of Science ID A1983RQ50800008
-
NATIONAL CITY-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS - WHAT DO WE KNOW AFTER 67 YEARS OF RESEARCH
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY
1982; 6 (1): 1-43
View details for Web of Science ID A1982PK80000001
-
CAPITAL CITIES IN THE AMERICAN URBAN SYSTEM - THE IMPACT OF STATE EXPANSION
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
1982; 88 (3): 565-578
View details for Web of Science ID A1982PY22700004
View details for PubMedID 7165056
-
DYNAMICS OF FORMAL POLITICAL-STRUCTURE - AN EVENT-HISTORY ANALYSIS
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW
1981; 46 (1): 19-35
View details for Web of Science ID A1981LE45500002