Herbert Clark
Albert Ray Lang Professor of Psychology, Emeritus
Web page: http://web.stanford.edu/~clark/
Bio
From Wikipedia:
"Herbert H. Clark (Herb Clark) is a psycholinguist currently serving as Professor of Psychology at Stanford University. His focuses include cognitive and social processes in language use; interactive processes in conversation, from low-level disfluencies through acts of speaking and understanding to the emergence of discourse; and word meaning and word use. Clark is known for his theory of "common ground": individuals engaged in conversation must share knowledge in order to be understood and have a meaningful conversation (Clark, 1985). Together with Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs (1986), he also developed the collaborative model, a theory for explaining how people in conversation coordinate with one another to determine definite references. Clark's books include Semantics and Comprehension, Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics, Arenas of Language Use and Using Language."
Administrative Appointments
-
Assistant Member of the Technical Staff, Bell Telephone, Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey (1963 - 1963)
-
Resident Visitor, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey (1964 - 1965)
-
Post-doctoral Visitor, Linguistics Institute, UCLA, (1966 - 1966)
-
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Carnegie-‐Mellon University (1966 - 1969)
-
Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Stanford University (1969 - 1975)
-
Professor, Department of Psychology, Stanford University (1975 - Present)
-
Chair, Department of Psychology, Stanford University (1987 - 1990)
-
Albert Ray Lang Professor of Psychology, Stanford University (2010 - Present)
-
Visiting Associate Professor, Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of California at Santa Cruz (1971 - 1971)
-
Honorary Research Fellow, University College London (1975 - 1976)
-
Honorary Research Fellow, University College London (2005 - 2006)
-
Sloan Visiting Scientist, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1978 - 1978)
-
Visiting Scientist, Max-‐Planck-‐Institüt für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (1979 - 1979)
-
Visiting Scientist, Max-‐Planck-‐Institüt für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (1981 - 1981)
-
Visiting Scientist, Max-‐Planck-‐Institüt für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (1983 - 1984)
-
Visiting Scientist, Max-‐Planck-‐Institüt für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (1990 - 1991)
-
Visiting Scientist, Max-‐Planck-‐Institüt für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (1997 - 1998)
-
Visiting Scientist, Max-‐Planck-‐Institüt für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (2011 - 2011)
-
Honorary Visiting Scholar, City University, London (2005 - 2006)
-
Visiting Professor, Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1999 - 1999)
-
Visiting Professor, Summer Institute of Linguistics, Michigan State University (2003 - 2003)
-
Visiting Professor, Institute of Linguistics, Stanford University (2007 - 2007)
-
Visiting Professor, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria (2008 - 2008)
Honors & Awards
-
National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Fellowship, Johns Hopkins University (1963-1966)
-
John Simon Guggenheim Fellow, John Simon Guggenheim Foundation (1975-1976)
-
Fellow, Division 3, American Psychological Association (1978)
-
Fellow, Association for Psychological Science (1988)
-
Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences (1978-1979)
-
Fellow, American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1982)
-
Member, Society of Experimental Psychologists (1984)
-
Fellow, Cognitive Science Society (2004)
-
Recipient, James McKeen Cattell Sabbatical Fellowship (2005-2006)
-
Recipient, Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award, Society for Text and Discourse (2009)
-
Foreign Member, Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen (Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences) (2000)
-
Albert Ray Lang Professor of Psychology, Stanford University (2010-)
-
Doctorat honoris causa (Honorary doctorate), University of Neuchatel (2012)
Boards, Advisory Committees, Professional Organizations
-
Member, Freiburg Institute for Advanced Study, Freiburg, Germany (2011 - 2011)
-
Member, Personality and Cognition Review Board, National Institute of Mental Health (1971 - 1974)
-
Member, Memory and Cognitive Processes Review Board, National Science Foundation (1976 - 1979)
-
Member, Editorial Board, Cognitive Psychology (1971 - 1981)
-
Consulting Editor, Journal of Experimental Psychology (1971 - 1974)
-
Member, Editorial Board, Journal of Memory and Language (1973 - 1996)
-
Advisory Editor, Contemporary Psychology (1974 - 1977)
-
Member, Editorial Board, Discourse Processes (1978 - Present)
-
Member, Editorial Board, Cognitive Science (1982 - Present)
-
Member, Editorial Board, Journal of Semantics (1982 - Present)
-
Associate Editor, Journal of Memory and Language (1982 - 1983)
-
Member, Editorial Advisory Board, Language and Cognitive Processes (1984 - Present)
-
Member, Editorial Advisory Board, Mind and Language (1986 - Present)
-
Member, Scientific Advisory Board, Center for Language Behavior Research, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
-
Member, Social Science Research Council Committee on Cognition and Survey Research (1986 - 1989)
-
Member, Editorial Board, Papers in Pragmatics (1989 - Present)
-
Member, Scientific Advisory Board, Center for Language Behavior Research, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (1990 - Present)
-
Member, Selection Panel, Presidential Faculty Fellows, National Science Foundation (1992 - 1992)
-
Member, Advisory Board, International Pragmatics Association (1995 - Present)
-
Member, External Review Committee, University of Chicago (1999 - 1999)
-
Member, Fachbeirat (Board of Advisors), Max-‐Planck-‐Institüt für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (2001 - 2013)
-
Chair, Fachbeirat (Board of Advisors), Max-‐Planck-‐Institüt für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (2009 - 2013)
-
Member, Advisory Board, Joint Action Science and Technology, European Science Foundation (2004 - 2004)
-
Member, Directorate Search Committee, Max Planck Gesellshaft, Munich, Germany (2007 - 2008)
Program Affiliations
-
Symbolic Systems Program
Professional Education
-
Post-Doctoral, Linguistics Institute, UCLA (1966)
-
PhD, Johns Hopkins University (1966)
-
M.A, Johns Hopkins University (1964)
-
B.A., Stanford University (1962)
All Publications
-
On depicting social agents.
The Behavioral and brain sciences
2023; 46: e51
Abstract
We take up issues raised in the commentaries about our proposal that social robots are depictions of social agents. Among these issues are the realism of social agents, experiencing robots, communicating with robots, anthropomorphism, and attributing traits to robots. We end with comments about the future of social robots.
View details for DOI 10.1017/S0140525X22002825
View details for PubMedID 37017069
-
Social robots as depictions of social agents.
The Behavioral and brain sciences
2022: 1-33
Abstract
Social robots serve people as tutors, caretakers, receptionists, companions, and other social agents. People know that the robots are mechanical artifacts, yet they interact with them as if they were actual agents. How is this possible? The proposal here is that people construe social robots not as social agents per se, but as depictions of social agents. They interpret them much as they interpret ventriloquist dummies, hand puppets, virtual assistants, and other interactive depictions of people and animals. Depictions as a class consist of three physical scenes with part-by-part mappings between them: (a) a base scene (the raw physical artifact), (b) the depiction proper (the artifact construed as a depiction), and (c) the scene depicted (the scene people are to imagine). With social robots, evidence shows, people form the same three scenes plus mappings: They perceive the raw machinery of a robot, construe it as a depiction of a character, and, using the depiction as a guide, engage in the pretense that they are interacting with the character depicted. So, with social robots, people also recognize three classes of agents-the characters depicted, the intended recipients of the depictions (those who view or interact with the robots), and the authorities responsible for the robots (the designers, makers, and owners). Construing social robots as depictions, we argue, accounts for many phenomena not covered by alternative models.
View details for DOI 10.1017/S0140525X22000668
View details for PubMedID 35343422
-
Anchoring Utterances.
Topics in cognitive science
2020
Abstract
For people to communicate with each other, they must tie, or anchor, each of their utterances to the speaker, addressees, place, time, display, and purpose of that utterance. Doing this takes coordination. Producers must index each of these entities for their addressees, and addressees must identify each of the entities the producers are indexing. When people are face to face, they have a battery of resources for doing this-speech, gestures of all kinds, and interactive strategies. But when addressees are separated from producers in space, time, or worlds, as on the telephone or in print, the available resources are more limited. The problem is that research on comprehension, production, and communication has often ignored, disguised, or distorted anchoring. As a result, accounts of these processes are often incomplete, misleading, or incorrect.
View details for DOI 10.1111/tops.12496
View details for PubMedID 32202068
-
Depicting in Communication
HUMAN LANGUAGE: FROM GENES AND BRAINS TO BEHAVIOR
2019: 235–47
View details for Web of Science ID 000552895700017
-
Depicting as a method of communication.
Psychological review
2016; 123 (3): 324-47
Abstract
In everyday discourse, people describe and point at things, but they also depict things with their hands, arms, head, face, eyes, voice, and body, with and without props. Examples are iconic gestures, facial gestures, quotations of many kinds, full-scale demonstrations, and make-believe play. Depicting, it is argued, is a basic method of communication. It is on a par with describing and pointing, but it works by different principles. The proposal here, called staging theory, is that depictions are physical scenes that people stage for others to use in imagining the scenes they are depicting. Staging a scene is the same type of act that is used by children in make-believe play and by the cast and crew in stage plays. This theory accounts for a diverse set of features of everyday depictions. Although depictions are integral parts of everyday utterances, they are absent from standard models of language processing. To be complete, these models will have to account for depicting as well as describing and pointing.
View details for DOI 10.1037/rev0000026
View details for PubMedID 26855255
- Imagination in narrative discourse Handbook of discourse analysis edited by Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 2014; 2nd: 772–786
- How to talk with children Language in interaction: Studies in honor or Eve V. Clark edited by Arnon, I., Kurumada, C., Estigarribia, B. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2014
- Working together Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology edited by Holtgraves, T. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014
- On the pretense theory of irony Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader edited by Gibbs, R. W., Colston, H. London: Routledge. 2007
- Social actions, social commitments Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and human interaction edited by Levinson, S. C., Enfield, N. J. Oxford: Berg Press. 2006: 126–150
-
Coordinating with each other in a material world
10th Annual Conferece on Language, Interaction and Culture
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD. 2005: 507–25
View details for DOI 10.1177/1461445605054404
View details for Web of Science ID 000232735600006
-
Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
2004; 50 (1): 62-81
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.004
View details for Web of Science ID 000187570800004
- Pragmatics of language performance Handbook of pragmatics edited by Horn, L. R., Ward, G. Oxford: Blackwell. 2004: 365–382
- Pointing and placing Pointing. Where language, culture, and cognition meet edited by Kita, S. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum. 2003: 243–268
-
Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking
COGNITION
2002; 84 (1): 73-111
Abstract
The proposal examined here is that speakers use uh and um to announce that they are initiating what they expect to be a minor (uh), or major (um), delay in speaking. Speakers can use these announcements in turn to implicate, for example, that they are searching for a word, are deciding what to say next, want to keep the floor, or want to cede the floor. Evidence for the proposal comes from several large corpora of spontaneous speech. The evidence shows that speakers monitor their speech plans for upcoming delays worthy of comment. When they discover such a delay, they formulate where and how to suspend speaking, which item to produce (uh or um), whether to attach it as a clitic onto the previous word (as in "and-uh"), and whether to prolong it. The argument is that uh and um are conventional English words, and speakers plan for, formulate, and produce them just as they would any word.
View details for Web of Science ID 000175548600003
View details for PubMedID 12062148
- Definite reference and mutual knowledge Psycholinguistics: Critical concepts in psychology. edited by Altmann, G. T. London: Routledge.. 2002
-
Speaking in time
ESCA Workshop on Dialogue and Prosody
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV. 2002: 5–13
View details for Web of Science ID 000173458300002
-
Repeating words in spontaneous speech
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
1998; 37 (3): 201-242
Abstract
Speakers often repeat the first word of major constituents, as in, "I uh I wouldn't be surprised at that." Repeats like this divide into four stages: an initial commitment to the constituent (with "I"); the suspension of speech; a hiatus in speaking (filled with "uh"); and a restart of the constituent ("I wouldn't."). An analysis of all repeated articles and pronouns in two large corpora of spontaneous speech shows that the four stages reflect different principles. Speakers are more likely to make a premature commitment, immediately suspending their speech, as both the local constituent and the constituent containing it become more complex. They plan some of these suspensions from the start as preliminary commitments to what they are about to say. And they are more likely to restart a constituent the more their stopping has disrupted its delivery. We argue that the principles governing these stages are general and not specific to repeats.
View details for Web of Science ID 000077736900001
View details for PubMedID 9892548
- Communal lexicons Context in language learning and language understanding edited by Malmkjaer, K., Williams, J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. 1998: 63–87
- Responding to indirect speech acts Pragmatics: Critical concepts edited by Kasher, A. London: Routledge. 1998: 99–147
-
Pronouncing ''the'' as ''thee'' to signal problems in speaking
COGNITION
1997; 62 (2): 151-167
Abstract
In spontaneous speaking, the is normally pronounced as thuh, with the reduced vowel schwa (rhyming with the first syllable of about). But it is sometimes pronounced as thiy, with a nonreduced vowel (rhyming with see). In a large corpus of spontaneous English conversation, speakers were found to use thiy to signal an immediate suspension of speech to deal with a problem in production. Fully 81% of the instances of thiy in the corpus were followed by a suspension of speech, whereas only 7% of a matched sample of thuhs were followed by such suspensions. The problems people dealt with after thiy were at many levels of production, including articulation. word retrieval, and choice of message, but most were in the following nominal.
View details for Web of Science ID A1997WV08900002
View details for PubMedID 9141905
-
Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION
1996; 22 (6): 1482-1493
Abstract
When people in conversation refer repeatedly to the same object, they come to use the same terms. This phenomenon, called lexical entrainment, has several possible explanations. Ahistorical accounts appeal only to the informativeness and availability of terms and to the current salience of the object's features. Historical accounts appeal in addition to the recency and frequency of past references and to partner-specific conceptualizations of the object that people achieve interactively. Evidence from 3 experiments favors a historical account and suggests that when speakers refer to an object, they are proposing a conceptualization of it, a proposal their addresses may or may not agree to. Once they do establish a shared conceptualization, a conceptual pact, they appeal to it in later references even when they could use simpler references. Over time, speakers simplify conceptual pacts and, when necessary, abandon them for new conceptualizations.
View details for Web of Science ID A1996VR35200010
View details for PubMedID 8921603
- Managing problems in speaking Methods and metrics of voice communications. edited by Kanki, B. G., Prinzo, O. V. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration. 1996
- Using language Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996
- Discourse in production Handbook of psycholinguistics edited by Gernsbacher, M. A. San Diego: Academic Press. 1994
-
ON THE COURSE OF ANSWERING QUESTIONS
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
1993; 32 (1): 25-38
View details for Web of Science ID A1993KK77600002
- Arenas of language use Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1992
- Asking questions and influencing answers Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys edited by Tanur, J. M. New York: Russell Sage. 1992
- Words, the world, and their possibilities The perception of structure edited by Lockhead, G., Pomerantz, J. Washington, DC: APA. 1991: 263–277
- Responding to indirect speech acts Pragmatics: A reader. edited by Davis, S. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1991
-
QUOTATIONS AS DEMONSTRATIONS
LANGUAGE
1990; 66 (4): 764-805
View details for Web of Science ID A1990EU81500004
-
OSTENSIBLE INVITATIONS
LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY
1990; 19 (4): 493-509
View details for Web of Science ID A1990ET47500002
- Referring as a collaborative process Intentions in Communication edited by Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J. L., Pollack, M. E. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1990
-
CONTRIBUTING TO DISCOURSE
COGNITIVE SCIENCE
1989; 13 (2): 259-294
View details for Web of Science ID A1989AR66500007
-
UNDERSTANDING BY ADDRESSEES AND OVERHEARERS
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
1989; 21 (2): 211-232
View details for Web of Science ID A1989U236200004
- Interpreting words in spatial descriptions Language and Cognitive Processes 1988; 3: 275-292
-
CONCEALING ONES MEANING FROM OVERHEARERS
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
1987; 26 (2): 209-225
View details for Web of Science ID A1987G798600005
-
REFERENCES IN CONVERSATION BETWEEN EXPERTS AND NOVICES
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL
1987; 116 (1): 26-37
View details for Web of Science ID A1987G064600002
- References in conversations between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1987; 116: 26-37
-
REFERRING AS A COLLABORATIVE PROCESS
COGNITION
1986; 22 (1): 1-39
View details for Web of Science ID A1986C262700001
View details for PubMedID 3709088
- Language use and language users Handbook of social psychology edited by Lindzey, G., Aronson, E. New York: Harper and Row. 1985; 3rd: 179–231
-
HOW TO MAKE REQUESTS THAT OVERCOME OBSTACLES TO COMPLIANCE
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
1985; 24 (5): 560-568
View details for Web of Science ID A1985ARK4800005
- Making sense of nonce sense The process of language understanding edited by Flores d’Arcais, G. B., Jarvella, R. J. London: Wiley. 1983: 297–331
-
COMMON GROUND AND THE UNDERSTANDING OF DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
1983; 22 (2): 245-258
View details for Web of Science ID A1983QK07400009
-
UNDERSTANDING OLD WORDS WITH NEW MEANINGS
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
1983; 22 (5): 591-608
View details for Web of Science ID A1983RM57400008
-
HEARERS AND SPEECH ACTS
LANGUAGE
1982; 58 (2): 332-373
View details for Web of Science ID A1982NX04900004
- Definite reference and mutual knowledge Elements of discourse understanding edited by Joshi, A. K., Webber, B., Sag, I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1981: 10–63
- Context for comprehension Attention and performance IX edited by Long, J., Baddeley, A. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.. 1981: 313–330
-
TELEPHONE GOODBYES
LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY
1981; 10 (1): 1-19
View details for Web of Science ID A1981LY03700001
-
WHEN NOUNS SURFACE AS VERBS
LANGUAGE
1979; 55 (4): 767-811
View details for Web of Science ID A1979JC77700001
-
RESPONDING TO INDIRECT SPEECH ACTS
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
1979; 11 (4): 430-477
View details for Web of Science ID A1979HN80500003
- Reference diaries Theoretical issues in natural language processing edited by Waltz, D. L. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 1978: 57–63
- Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. 1977
- Bridging. Thinking edited by Johnson-‐Laird, P. N., Wason, P. C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1977: 711–420
- Comprehension and the given-‐new contract Discourse production and comprehension edited by Freedle, R. O. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1977: 1–40
- Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Thinking edited by Johnson-‐Laird, P. N., Wason, P. C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1977: 98–113
-
POSITION, DIRECTION, AND THEIR PERCEPTUAL INTEGRALITY
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS
1976; 19 (4): 328-334
View details for Web of Science ID A1976BR22200008
-
LOCUS OF SEMANTIC CONGRUITY EFFECT IN COMPARATIVE JUDGMENTS
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE
1975; 104 (1): 35-47
View details for Web of Science ID A1975V750900003
-
JUDGING UP AND DOWN
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE
1975; 1 (4): 339-352
Abstract
In Experiment I subjects were asked to judge whether an arrow was pointing up or pointing down at various heights inside a surrounding rectangle. They were faster on an arrow pointing up the higher it was in the rectangle, and they were faster on an arrow pointing down the lower it was in the rectangle. Experiments 2, 3, and 4 were designed to test sources for this"congruity effect." The intrusive height information for each arrow was assumed to facilitate or interfere with (a) the activation of the correct motor response; (b) the maintenance of the implicit instruction "Is it pointing up, or is it pointing down?"; or (c) the selection of the criterial perceptual information as a basis for the response. All three experiments were consistent with c, but not with a or b. Indeed, the results contrasted with previous demonstrations of the Stroop effect in certain critical features.
View details for Web of Science ID A1975AU28100004
View details for PubMedID 1185121
- Semantics and comprehension The Hague: Mouton. 1975
-
UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS MEANT FROM WHAT IS SAID - STUDY IN CONVERSATIONALLY CONVEYED REQUESTS
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
1975; 14 (1): 56-72
View details for Web of Science ID A1975V709100005
- Bridging. Theoretical issues in natural language processing. edited by Schank, R. C., Nash-Webber, B. L. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.. 1975
- What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension Psycholinguistics: Critical concepts in psychology edited by Altmann, G. M. London: Routledge. 1974
-
WHATS NEW - ACQUIRING NEW INFORMATION AS A PROCESS IN COMPREHENSION
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
1974; 13 (5): 512-521
View details for Web of Science ID A1974U243100003
-
LANGUAGE AS FIXED-EFFECT FALLACY - CRITIQUE OF LANGUAGE STATISTICS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
1973; 12 (4): 335-359
View details for Web of Science ID A1973Q627600001
- Space, time, semantics, and the child Cognitive development and the acquisition of language edited by Moore, T. New York: Academic Press. 1973: 27–63
- And and or, or the comprehension of pseudoimperatives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1973; 12: 258-272
- On the meeting of semantics and perception Visual information processing edited by Chase, W. G. New York: Academic Press. 1973: 311–381
- Mental operations in the comparison of sentences and pictures Cognition in learning and memory edited by Gregg, L. New York: Wiley. 1972: 205–232
-
PROCESS OF COMPARING SENTENCES AGAINST PICTURES
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
1972; 3 (3): 472-517
View details for Web of Science ID A1972M981700007
-
The semantics of sentence subjects.
Language and speech
1971; 14 (1): 34-46
View details for PubMedID 5580469
- Experiments on the segmentation of an artificial speech analogue Cognition and the development of language edited by Hayes, J. R. New York: Wiley. 1970: 221–234
- Word associations and linguistic theory New horizons in linguistics edited by Lyons, J. Baltimore: Penguin. 1970: 271–286
-
LINGUISTIC PROCESSES IN DEDUCTIVE REASONING
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
1969; 76 (4): 387-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1969D785000005
-
INFLUENCE OF LANGUAGE ON SOLVING 3-TERM SERIES PROBLEMS
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
1969; 82 (2): 205-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1969E712800003
View details for PubMedID 5379099
-
SEMANTIC DISTINCTIONS AND MEMORY FOR COMPLEX SENTENCES
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
1968; 20: 129-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1968B216600005
View details for PubMedID 5653416
-
PREDICTION OF RECALL PATTERNS IN SIMPLE ACTIVE SENTENCES
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
1966; 5 (2): 99-?
View details for Web of Science ID A19667807600001
-
SOME STRUCTURAL-PROPERTIES OF SIMPLE ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SENTENCES
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
1965; 4 (5): 365-370
View details for Web of Science ID A1965CHJ5000005
- Spontaneous discourse Oxford Handbook of Language Production edited by Ferreira, V., Goldrick, M., Miazzo, M. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013
- Spoken discourse and its emergence Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics edited by Spivey, M. J., McRae, K., Joanisse, M. F. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. 2012: 541–557
- Unspoken questions, unspoken answers Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives edited by Ruiter, J. d. 2012: 81–100
- Talking as if. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human Robot Interaction 2008
- Context and common ground Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd Edition. Oxford: Elsevier.. 2006
- Pauses and hesitations: Psycholinguistic approach Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd Edition Oxford: Elsevier. 2006
- Changing conceptions of reference Experimental pragmatics. edited by Noveck, I., Sperber, D. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan. 2004: 25–49
-
Navigating joint projects in telephone conversations
13th Annual Winter Conference on Discourse, Text and Cognition
LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC INC-TAYLOR & FRANCIS. 2004: 1–23
View details for Web of Science ID 000220042000001
- Variations on a ranarian theme Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives edited by Strömqvist, S., Verhoeven, L. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2004: 457–476
-
Navigating joint projects with dialogue
COGNITIVE SCIENCE
2003; 27 (2): 195-225
View details for Web of Science ID 000182309500002
- Language production. Oxford International Encyclopedia of Linguistics 2nd edition edited by Frawley, W. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003
- When nouns surface as verbs Critical concepts in linguistics edited by Katamba, F. London: Routledge. 2003: 128–183
- Psycholinguistics Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Third Edition: Cognition edited by Medin, D. L. New York: John Wiley.. 2002: 209–259
- Conversation, structure of Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science edited by Nadel, L. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan. 2002
- Imagination in discourse Handbook of discourse analysis edited by Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 2001
- Conversation International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. edited by Smelser, N. J., Baltes, P. B. London: Elsevier. 2001
- Preface Samenhang in diversiteit: Opstellen voor Leo Noordman Tilburg NL: Katholieke Universiteit Brabant. 2000
- O uso da linguagem Cadernos de Traduçao, 2000; 9: 49-74
- Everyone can write better (and you are no exception). Social Psychology of Gender, Race, and Ethnicity edited by Keough, K. A., Garcia, J. New York: McGraw-‐Hill.. 2000
- On the origins of conversation Verbum 1999; 21: 147-161
- How do real people communicate with virtual partners? Proceedings of 1999 AAAI Fall Symposium, Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems 1999
- Passing time in conversation Proceedings of the workshop on the structure of spoken and written texts 1999
- Speaking in time. Proceedings of the ESCA workshop on dialogue and prosody 1999
- Psycholinguistics. MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences MIT Press.. 1999
- Psycholinguistics. MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science MIT Press.. 1998
-
Coordinating hands, eyes, and voice
19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive-Science-Society
LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC PUBL. 1997: 975–975
View details for Web of Science ID 000168551500270
-
Dogmas of understanding
DISCOURSE PROCESSES
1997; 23 (3): 567-598
View details for Web of Science ID A1997YC69300013
- From comprehension to understanding Advanced psycholinguistics: A Bressanone retrospective for Giovanni B. Flores d’Arcais edited by Levelt, W. J. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. 1996
- Communities, commonalities, and communication Rethinking linguistic relativity edited by Gumperz, J., Levinson, S. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996: 324–355
- Pragmatics and discourse Handbook of Perception and Cognition edited by Miller, J. L., Eimas, P. D. New York: Academic Press. 1995
-
MANAGING PROBLEMS IN SPEAKING
SPEECH COMMUNICATION
1994; 15 (3-4): 243-250
View details for Web of Science ID A1994PZ33200006
-
REPRODUCTION AND DEMONSTRATION IN QUOTATIONS
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
1993; 32 (6): 805-819
View details for Web of Science ID A1993MK97300005
- Managing problems in speaking Proceedings of International Symposium on Spoken Dialogue edited by Shirai, K., Kobayashi, T., Harada, Y. 1993
- Prepositions aren’t places Brain and Behavioral Sciences 1993; 16 (2): 252-253
-
COORDINATING BELIEFS IN CONVERSATION
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
1992; 31 (2): 183-194
View details for Web of Science ID A1992HK69800003
- Speech acts and hearers’ beliefs Pragmatics: A reader edited by Davis, S. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1991
- Pragmatics of language The Blackwell dictionary of cognitive psychology edited by Eysenck, M. W. Oxford: Blackwell. 1991: 197–198
- Coordinating activity: An analysis of interaction in computer-‐supported cooperative work Proceedings, CHI ‘91, Human Factors in Computing Systems 1991
-
GROUNDING IN COMMUNICATION
CONF ON SOCIALLY SHARED COGNITION
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC. 1991: 127–149
View details for Web of Science ID A1991BU94D00007
-
COLLABORATION IN COMMUNICATION BETWEEN PILOTS AND AIR-TRAFFIC-CONTROLLERS
PSYCHONOMIC SOC INC. 1990: 494–94
View details for Web of Science ID A1990EC29300179
- Language production International encyclopedia of linguistics edited by Bright, W. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1990: 278–281
- Commentary on Mosteller and Youtz “Quantifying probabilistic expressions.” Statistical Science 1990; 5: 2-34
- Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. (Japanese Translation) 1987
- Collaborating on contributions to conversation Language processing in a social context edited by Dietrich, R., Graumann, C. F. Amsterdam: North Holland. 1987
- Four dimensions of language use. The pragmatic perspective edited by Bertuccelli-‐Papi, M. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1987: 9–25
- Relevance to what? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1987; 10: 714-715
- Concealing one’s meaning from overhearers Journal of Memory and Language 1987: 209-225
- Collaborating on contributions to conversation Language and Cognitive Processes 1987; 2: 19-41
-
WHAT IS SAID TO WHOM - A REJOINDER TO ALLAN
LANGUAGE
1986; 62 (3): 518-529
View details for Web of Science ID A1986E312700003
- Is philosophy of language empirical? Mind and Language 1986; 1: 15-17
- Inferences in comprehension Functionalism in Linguistics (Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe). edited by Driven, R., Fried, V. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1985
-
SPEECH, PLACE, AND ACTION - STUDIES IN DEIXIS AND RELATED TOPICS - JARVELLA,RJ, KLEIN,W (Book Review)
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS
1984; 5 (2): 182-184
View details for Web of Science ID A1984TZ95900008
-
ON THE PRETENSE THEORY OF IRONY
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL
1984; 113 (1): 121-126
Abstract
We propose a pretense theory of irony based on suggestions by Grice and Fowler. In being ironic, the theory goes, a speaker is pretending to be an injudicious person speaking to an uninitiated audience; the speaker intends the addresses of the irony to discover the pretense and thereby see his or her attitude toward the speaker, the audience, and the utterance. The pretense theory, we argue, is superior to the mention theory of irony proposed by Sperber and Wilson.
View details for Web of Science ID A1984SF64600010
View details for PubMedID 6242407
- Psychological constraints on language: A commentary on Bresnan and Kaplan and on Givon Method and tactics in cognitive science edited by Malt, B. C., Kintsch, W., Miller, J. R., Polson, P. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1984: 191–214
- Audience design in meaning and reference Language and comprehension edited by LeNy, J. F., Kintsch, W. Amsterdam: North-‐Holland Publishing Co. 1983: 287–299
- Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. (Japanese Translation) 1982
- Critics’ beliefs about hearers’ beliefs: A rejoinder to Johnson-‐Laird, Sperber, and Wilks Mutual Knowledge edited by Smith, N. V. New York: Academic Press. 1982: 52–59
- La visée vers l’auditoire dans la signification et le référence. Bulletin de Psychologie 1982; 35: 767-776
- Speech acts and hearers’ beliefs Mutual knowledge edited by Smith, N. V. New York: Academic Press. 1982: 1–36
- The relevance of common ground: Comments on Sperber and Wilson Mutual knowledge edited by Smith, N. V. New York: Academic Press. 1982: 124–127
-
POLITENESS IN REQUESTS - REJOINDER
COGNITION
1981; 9 (3): 311-315
View details for Web of Science ID A1981MD20700004
View details for PubMedID 7197606
-
POLITE RESPONSES TO POLITE REQUESTS
COGNITION
1980; 8 (2): 111-143
View details for Web of Science ID A1980JV12700001
View details for PubMedID 7389285
- Preface Inferring from language Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.. 1979
-
IN SEARCH OF REFERENTS FOR NOUNS AND PRONOUNS
MEMORY & COGNITION
1979; 7 (1): 35-41
View details for Web of Science ID A1979GR87000005
- Inferring what is meant. Studies in the perception of language edited by M.Levelt, W. J., Flores d’Arcais, G. B. London: Wiley. 1978: 295–321
-
WORDS AND STATISTICS
BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOC. 1977: 242–42
View details for Web of Science ID A1977EB31200024
- Universals, relativity and language processing Universals of language: Method and theory edited by Greenberg, J. H. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1977: 225–278
- Research methods in psycholinguistics. Handbook of perception: Language and speech edited by Carterette, E. C., Friedman, M. P. New York: Academic Press. 1976: 25–74
- Discussion of Wike and Church’s comments Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1976; 15: 257-266
- Psychological processes in linguistic explanation Explaining linguistic phenomena edited by Cohen, D. Washington: Hemisphere Publication Corporation. 1974
-
PERCEPTUAL CODING STRATEGIES IN FORMATION AND VERIFICATION OF DESCRIPTIONS
MEMORY & COGNITION
1974; 2 (1A): 101-111
View details for Web of Science ID A1974S319500018
- Review of Understanding natural language by Terry Winograd American Scientist 1974; 62: 118-119
- Clark, H. H. Processus linguistiques dans le raisonnement deductif. Textes pour une psycholinguistique edited by Mehler, J., Noizet, G. Paris: Mouton. 1974: 565–602
-
POWER OF POSITIVE SPEAKING - IT TAKES LONGER TO UNDERSTAND
PSYCHOLOGY TODAY
1974; 8 (4): 102-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1974T844600023
- Semantics and comprehension. Ed.), Current trends in linguistics edited by Sebeok, T. A. The Hague: Mouton. 1974: 1291–1428
-
Perceptual coding strategies in the formation and verification of descriptions.
Memory & cognition
1974; 2 (1): 101-111
Abstract
Three experiments were carried out to study the "picture coding" process implicit both in making up descriptions of pictures and in verifying descriptions against pictures. In the first experiment, Ss were asked simply to describe pictures of one object above another; some pictures were symmetrical vertically and some were not. In the other two experiments, other Ss were timed as they judged whether sentences likeStar isn't below line were true or false of such pictures. According to the results, Ss comply to three ordered "preference" rules in describing the two objects, rules that are conditional on characteristics of the picture and demands of the task. Furthermore, Ss in the verification task comply to the same three rules when they view and encode the picturebefore they read the sentence to be verified, but to only one of the rules when they view the pictureafter they read the sentence. The results also reconfirm two recently proposed models for the process of verifying sentences against pictures.
View details for DOI 10.3758/BF03197499
View details for PubMedID 24214706
- A sometimes rocky marriage: Review of Psycholinguistics: Chomsky and psychology by Judith Greene Contemporary Psychology 1974; 19: 277-278
- The chronometric study of meaning components Problems actuels en psycholinguistique Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. 1974: 489–505
-
DRAWING INFERENCES FROM PRESUPPOSITIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF AFFIRMATIVE AND NEGATIVE SENTENCES
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
1973; 12 (1): 21-31
View details for Web of Science ID A1973O860600002
-
DIFFICULTIES PEOPLE HAVE IN ANSWERING QUESTION WHERE-IS-IT
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
1972; 11 (3): 265-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1972M546400001
-
EVIDENCE CONCERNING HUTTENLOCHER,J AND HIGGINS,ET THEORY OF REASONING - SECOND REPLY
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
1972; 79 (5): 428-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1972N608800006
- Les processus de la comprehension des phrases La Psycholinguistique: Lectures edited by Slama-‐Cazacu, T. Paris: Klincksieck. 1972: 180–182
-
Semantics in the perception of verticality.
British journal of psychology
1971; 62 (3): 311-326
View details for PubMedID 5160435
-
SEMANTICS OF SENTENCE SUBJECTS
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH
1971; 14 (JAN-M): 34-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1971J318700005
-
SEMANTICS IN PERCEPTION OF VERTICALITY
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
1971; 62 (AUG): 311-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1971K276100026
-
ADJECTIVES, COMPARATIVES, AND SYLLOGISMS
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
1971; 78 (6): 505-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1971K915400003
- The importance of linguistics for the study of speech hesitations The perception of language edited by Horton, D. L., Jenkins, J. J. Columbus: Charles Merrill.. 1971: 69–78
- Remembering sentences as semantic features edited by Linhart, J. 1970
- Comprehending comparatives Advances in psycholinguistics edited by Flores d’Arcais, G. B., Levelt, W. J. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.. 1970: 294–306
- The primitive nature of children’s relational concepts Cognition and the development of language edited by Hayes, J. R. New York: Wiley.. 1970: 269–278
- Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Series in Psychology 1969: 730
-
ROLE OF SEMANTICS IN REMEMBERING COMPARATIVE SENTENCES
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
1969; 82 (3): 545-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1969F000600023
- Memory for semantic features in the verb Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969; 80: 326-334
-
ON USE AND MEANING OF PREPOSITIONS
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
1968; 7 (2): 421-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1968B703400026
- Review of Psycholinguistics Papers Journal of Linguistics 1968; 4: 139-140
-
USE OF SYNTAX IN UNDERSTANDING SENTENCES
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
1968; 59: 219-?
View details for Web of Science ID A1968B592900004