John Weyant
Professor (Research) of Management Science and Engineering and of Energy Science Engineering
Bio
John P. Weyant is Professor of Management Science and Engineering and Director of the Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) at Stanford University. He is also a Senior Fellow of the Precourt Institute for Energy and an an affiliated faculty member of the Stanford School of Earth, Environment and Energy Sciences, the Woods Institute for the Environment, and the Freeman-Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford. His current research focuses on analysis of multi-sector, multi-region coupled human and earth systems dynamics, global change systems analysis, energy technology assessment, and models for strategic planning.
Weyant was a founder and serves as chairman of the Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium (IAMC), a seventeen-year old collaboration among over 60 member institutions from around the world. He has been an active adviser to the United Nations, the European Commission, U.S.Department of Energy, the U.S. Department of State, and the Environmental Protection Agency. In California, he has been and adviser to the California Air Resources, the California Energy Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission..
Weyant was awarded the US Association for Energy Economics’ 2008 Adelmann-Frankel award for unique and innovative contributions to the field of energy economics and the award for outstanding lifetime contributions to the Profession for 2017 from the International Association for Energy Economics, and a Life Time Achievement award from the Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium in 2018. Weyant was honored in 2007 as a major contributor to the Nobel Peace prize awarded to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and in 2008 by Chairman Mary Nichols for contributions to the to the California Air Resources Board's Economic and Technology Advancement Advisory Committee on AB 32.
Fields of Specialization:
Energy/Environmental Policy Analysis, Strategic Planning
Interests:
Overall goal is to accelerate the use of systems models at state, country, and global scales, aiming to provide the best available information and insights to government and private-sector decision makers. Specific areas include energy, climate change, and sustainable development policy, including emerging technologies and market design alternatives. Draws on concepts and techniques from science and engineering fundamentals (e.g., thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, materials science, and electrical power systems), operations research, economics, finance, and decision theory.
Academic Appointments
-
Professor (Research), Management Science and Engineering
-
Professor (Research), Energy Science & Engineering
-
Deputy Director, Precourt Energy Efficiency Center
-
Affiliate, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment
Honors & Awards
-
Nobel Peace Prize, Significant Contributions to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Award, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007)
-
Adelman Frankel Award for 2008 for Unique and Enduring Contributions to the Field, U.S. Association for Energy Economics, (2008)
-
Outstanding Contributions to the Profession Award for 2017,(Maximum One Award per Year), International Association for Energy Economics (2017)
-
(First) Life Time Achievement Award, Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium (2018)
Program Affiliations
-
Public Policy
Professional Education
-
MS, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Operations Research and Statistics (1970)
-
MS, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Aero. Eng. and Astronautics (1970)
-
PhD, UC Berkeley, Management Science (1976)
2024-25 Courses
- The Stanford Energy Seminar
CEE 301, ENERGY 301, MS&E 494 (Aut, Win, Spr) -
Independent Studies (7)
- Directed Individual Study in Earth Systems
EARTHSYS 297 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Directed Reading and Research
MS&E 408 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Directed Reading in Environment and Resources
ENVRES 398 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Directed Research
EARTHSYS 250 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Directed Research in Environment and Resources
ENVRES 399 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Honors Program in Earth Systems
EARTHSYS 199 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Special Studies in Engineering
ENGR 199 (Aut, Win, Spr)
- Directed Individual Study in Earth Systems
-
Prior Year Courses
2023-24 Courses
- Advanced Methods in Modeling for Climate and Energy Policy
MS&E 394 (Spr) - Capstone Project Seminar in Environment and Resources
ENVRES 290 (Aut) - International Environmental Policy
MS&E 92Q (Win) - The Stanford Energy Seminar
CEE 301, ENERGY 301, MS&E 494 (Aut, Win, Spr)
2022-23 Courses
- Advanced Methods in Modeling for Climate and Energy Policy
MS&E 394 (Spr) - Capstone Project Seminar in Environment and Resources
ENVRES 290 (Aut, Win) - International Environmental Policy
MS&E 92Q (Win) - Sustainable Energy Interdisciplinary Graduate Seminar
CEE 372, ENERGY 309, MS&E 495 (Aut) - The Energy Seminar
CEE 301, ENERGY 301, MS&E 494 (Aut, Win, Spr)
2021-22 Courses
- Advanced Methods in Modeling for Climate and Energy Policy
MS&E 394 (Spr) - Capstone Project Seminar in Environment and Resources
ENVRES 290 (Aut, Win) - Doctoral Research Seminar in Energy-Environmental Systems Modeling and Analysis
MS&E 391 (Aut) - International Environmental Policy
MS&E 92Q (Win) - Sustainable Energy Interdisciplinary Graduate Seminar
CEE 372, ENERGY 309, MS&E 495 (Aut, Win) - The Energy Seminar
CEE 301, ENERGY 301, MS&E 494 (Aut, Win, Spr)
- Advanced Methods in Modeling for Climate and Energy Policy
Stanford Advisees
-
Doctoral Dissertation Advisor (AC)
Shahab Mousavi -
Master's Program Advisor
Michael Bendok, Alayna Burns, Jamie Holmstrom, Alex Kearns, Lyna Kim, Mattia Mauro, Katherine Moore, Thomas Sarda, Andrew Tidd, Stephanie Unur, Jessica Yan, Mark Yang -
Doctoral Dissertation Co-Advisor (AC)
Jill Ferguson, Alison Ong
All Publications
-
Power sector impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
2024; 19 (1)
View details for DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ad0d3b
View details for Web of Science ID 001111145500001
-
Equity implications of net-zero emissions: A multi-model analysis of energy expenditures across income classes under economy-wide deep decarbonization policies
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
2024; 5
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100118
View details for Web of Science ID 001133314700001
-
Net-Zero CO2 by 2050 Scenarios for the United States in the Energy Modeling Forum 37 Study.
Energy and climate change
2023; 4: 1-13
Abstract
The Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) 37 study on deep decarbonization and high electrification analyzed a set of scenarios that achieve economy-wide net-zero carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in North America by mid-century, exploring the implications of different technology evolutions, policies, and behavioral assumptions affecting energy supply and demand. For this paper, 16 modeling teams reported resulting emissions projections, energy system evolution, and economic activity. This paper provides an overview of the study, documents the scenario design, provides a roadmap for complementary forthcoming papers from this study, and offers an initial summary and comparison of results for net-zero CO2 by 2050 scenarios in the United States. We compare various outcomes across models and scenarios, such as emissions, energy use, fuel mix evolution, and technology adoption. Despite disparate model structure and sources for input assumptions, there is broad agreement in energy system trends across models towards deep decarbonization of the electricity sector coupled with increased end-use electrification of buildings, transportation, and to a lesser extent industry. All models deploy negative emissions technologies (e.g., direct air capture and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage) in addition to land sinks to achieve net-zero CO2 emissions. Important differences emerged in the results, showing divergent pathways among end-use sectors with deep electrification and grid decarbonization as necessary but not sufficient conditions to achieve net zero. These differences will be explored in the papers complementing this study to inform efforts to reach net-zero emissions and future research needs.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100104
View details for PubMedID 37538833
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC10395320
-
Emissions and energy impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act.
Science (New York, N.Y.)
2023; 380 (6652): 1324-1327
Abstract
Economy-wide emissions drop 43 to 48% below 2005 levels by 2035 with accelerated clean energy deployment.
View details for DOI 10.1126/science.adg3781
View details for PubMedID 37384684
-
Climate-related financial risk assessment on energy infrastructure investments
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
2022; 167
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112689
View details for Web of Science ID 000886389100002
-
Introduction to the Special Issue "EMF 36: Carbon pricing after Paris (CarPri)"
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2022; 112
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106139
View details for Web of Science ID 000827384800003
-
Global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2022; 172 (1-2)
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-022-03336-9
View details for Web of Science ID 000790275200001
-
The contribution of bioenergy to the decarbonization of transport: a multi-model assessment
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2022; 170 (3-4)
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-03245-3
View details for Web of Science ID 000750157900002
-
Pricing climate-related risks of energy investments
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
2022; 154
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111881
View details for Web of Science ID 000720754900004
-
Climate policy models need to get real about people - here's how
NATURE
2021; 594 (7862): 174-176
View details for DOI 10.1038/d41586-021-01500-2
View details for Web of Science ID 000659234000009
View details for PubMedID 34103720
-
Accounting for the Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity of Regional Electricity Transfers.
Environmental science & technology
2021
Abstract
Accurately quantifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is essential for climate policy implementation but challenging in the case of electricity transfers across regulatory jurisdictions. Regulating emissions associated with delivered electricity is further complicated by contractual arrangements for dynamic electricity transfers that confound emission accounting approaches rooted in the physics of grid operations. Here, we propose a novel consumption-based accounting methodology to reconcile the nominal and the physical flows of electricity from generators to consumers. We also compare capacity factor-based and regression-based approaches for estimating default emission factors, in the absence of fully specified nominal electricity flows. As a case study, we apply this approach to assess the methods by which California regulators quantify specified and unspecified electricity imports and their associated GHG emissions. Collectively, these efforts illustrate principles for a comprehensive, empirical accounting framework that could inform efforts to improve the accuracy and consistency of policies regulating regional electricity transfers.
View details for DOI 10.1021/acs.est.0c08096
View details for PubMedID 33956448
-
Introduction to the special feature on energy scenarios for long-term climate change mitigation in Japan
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE
2021
View details for DOI 10.1007/s11625-021-00931-0
View details for Web of Science ID 000621308700001
-
The Energy Modeling Forum (EMF)-30 study on short-lived climate forcers: introduction and overview
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2020
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02938-5
View details for Web of Science ID 000597776800001
-
An overview of the Energy Modeling Forum 33rd study: assessing large-scale global bioenergy deployment for managing climate change
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2020
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02945-6
View details for Web of Science ID 000599033100001
-
Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2020; 163 (3): 1553–68
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y
View details for Web of Science ID 000608584200023
-
Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison
ENERGY POLICY
2020; 144
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111599
View details for Web of Science ID 000565663600001
-
Integrated Climate-Change Assessment Scenarios and Carbon Dioxide Removal
ONE EARTH
2020; 3 (2): 166-172
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.001
View details for Web of Science ID 000645627500009
-
Integrated Climate-Change Assessment Scenarios and Carbon Dioxide Removal.
One earth (Cambridge, Mass.)
2020; 3 (2): 166-172
Abstract
To halt climate change this century, we must reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from human activities to net zero. Any emission sources, such as in the energy or land-use sectors, must be balanced by natural or technological carbon sinks that facilitate CO2 removal (CDR) from the atmosphere. Projections of demand for large-scale CDR are based on an integrated scenario framework for emission scenarios composed of emission profiles as well as alternative socio-economic development trends and social values consistent with them. The framework, however, was developed years before systematic reviews of CDR entered the literature. This primer provides an overview of the purposes of scenarios in climate-change research and how they are used. It also introduces the integrated scenario framework and why it came about. CDR studies using the scenario framework, as well as its limitations, are discussed. Possible future developments for the scenario framework are highlighted, especially in relation to CDR.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.001
View details for PubMedID 34173531
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC7441969
-
EMF-33 insights on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2020
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02784-5
View details for Web of Science ID 000561235000001
-
The Evolution of Integrated Assessment: Developing the Next Generation of Use-Inspired Integrated Assessment Tools
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 12
2020; 12: 471–87
View details for DOI 10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-030314
View details for Web of Science ID 000590408400024
-
On choosing the resolution of normative models
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
2019; 279 (2): 511–23
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.017
View details for Web of Science ID 000477091900018
-
Macro-Energy Systems: Toward a New Discipline
JOULE
2019; 3 (10): 2282–86
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.017
View details for Web of Science ID 000490703300002
-
Inside the Black Box: Understanding key drivers of global emission scenarios
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
2019; 111: 268–81
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.019
View details for Web of Science ID 000451631300021
-
INTRODUCTION TO THE EMF 32 STUDY ON U.S. CARBON TAX SCENARIOS
CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS
2018; 9 (1)
View details for DOI 10.1142/S2010007818400018
View details for Web of Science ID 000428286000001
-
INTRODUCTION TO THE EMF 32 STUDY ON U.S. CARBON TAX SCENARIOS.
Climate change economics
2018; 9 (1)
Abstract
This paper is an introduction to, "The EMF 32 Study on U.S. Carbon Tax Scenarios," part of the Stanford Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) Model Inter-comparison Project (MIP) number 32. Eleven modeling teams participated in this study examining the economic and environmental impacts of various carbon tax trajectories and differing uses of carbon tax revenues. This special issue of Climate Change Economics documents the results of this study with four crosscutting papers that summarize results across models, and ten papers from individual modeling teams.
View details for DOI 10.1142/S2010007818400018
View details for PubMedID 30245781
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC6145491
-
Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
2017; 114 (26): 6722–27
Abstract
A number of analyses, meta-analyses, and assessments, including those performed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and the International Energy Agency, have concluded that deployment of a diverse portfolio of clean energy technologies makes a transition to a low-carbon-emission energy system both more feasible and less costly than other pathways. In contrast, Jacobson et al. [Jacobson MZ, Delucchi MA, Cameron MA, Frew BA (2015) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(49):15060-15065] argue that it is feasible to provide "low-cost solutions to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of WWS [wind, water and solar power] across all energy sectors in the continental United States between 2050 and 2055", with only electricity and hydrogen as energy carriers. In this paper, we evaluate that study and find significant shortcomings in the analysis. In particular, we point out that this work used invalid modeling tools, contained modeling errors, and made implausible and inadequately supported assumptions. Policy makers should treat with caution any visions of a rapid, reliable, and low-cost transition to entire energy systems that relies almost exclusively on wind, solar, and hydroelectric power.
View details for PubMedID 28630353
-
Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY
2017; 11 (1): 115-137
View details for DOI 10.1093/reep/rew018
View details for Web of Science ID 000397191200008
-
Dynamically estimating the distributional impacts of US climate policy with NEMS: A case study of the Climate Protection Act of 2013
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2016; 55: 303-318
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.02.021
View details for Web of Science ID 000375358100028
-
Comparison of low-carbon pathways for California
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2015; 131 (4): 545-557
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1403-5
View details for Web of Science ID 000358179400007
-
Comparison of integrated assessment models: Carbon price impacts on US energy
ENERGY POLICY
2015; 76: 18-31
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.10.011
View details for Web of Science ID 000347760200003
-
The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2014; 123 (3-4): 353-367
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7
View details for Web of Science ID 000334414900002
-
Preface and introduction to EMF 27
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2014; 123 (3-4): 345-352
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1102-7
View details for Web of Science ID 000334414900001
-
Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2014; 123 (3-4): 397-411
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0874-5
View details for Web of Science ID 000334414900005
-
Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2014; 123 (3-4): 477-493
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0965-3
View details for Web of Science ID 000334414900010
-
End use technology choice in the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS): An analysis of the residential and commercial building sectors
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2013; 40: 773-784
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.023
View details for Web of Science ID 000329081300072
-
Electric sector investments under technological and policy-related uncertainties: a stochastic programming approach
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2013; 121 (2): 143-160
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0859-4
View details for Web of Science ID 000326944000005
-
Introduction to the EMF 29 special issue on the role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy Preface
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2012; 34: S95-S96
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.10.002
View details for Web of Science ID 000313385200001
-
Regional energy system variation in global models: Results from the Asian Modeling Exercise scenarios
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2012; 34: S293-S305
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.018
View details for Web of Science ID 000313600200005
-
A special issue on the RCPs
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2011; 109 (1-2): 1-4
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y
View details for Web of Science ID 000297350200001
-
Competing or coordinating: IT R&D investment decision making subject to information time lag
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT
2011; 12 (3): 241-251
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10799-011-0105-6
View details for Web of Science ID 000293638900004
-
Accelerating the development and diffusion of new energy technologies: Beyond the "valley of death"
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2011; 33 (4): 674-682
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.08.008
View details for Web of Science ID 000291906200017
- EMF 25 Summary Report: Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Mitigation Energy Modeling Forum 2011
-
The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment
NATURE
2010; 463 (7282): 747-756
Abstract
Advances in the science and observation of climate change are providing a clearer understanding of the inherent variability of Earth's climate system and its likely response to human and natural influences. The implications of climate change for the environment and society will depend not only on the response of the Earth system to changes in radiative forcings, but also on how humankind responds through changes in technology, economies, lifestyle and policy. Extensive uncertainties exist in future forcings of and responses to climate change, necessitating the use of scenarios of the future to explore the potential consequences of different response options. To date, such scenarios have not adequately examined crucial possibilities, such as climate change mitigation and adaptation, and have relied on research processes that slowed the exchange of information among physical, biological and social scientists. Here we describe a new process for creating plausible scenarios to investigate some of the most challenging and important questions about climate change confronting the global community.
View details for DOI 10.1038/nature08823
View details for Web of Science ID 000274394300028
View details for PubMedID 20148028
-
A perspective on integrated assessment
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2009; 95 (3-4): 317-323
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9612-4
View details for Web of Science ID 000268255300002
-
Overview of EMF 22 US transition scenarios
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2009; 31: S198-S211
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.015
View details for Web of Science ID 000273377900013
- The Energy Journal 2009 Special Issue: World Natural Gas Markets and Trade Association for Energy Economics 2009
-
Introduction to the EMF 22 special issue on climate change control scenarios
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2009; 31: S63-S63
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.014
View details for Web of Science ID 000273377900001
-
Optimizing US Mitigation Strategies for the Light-Duty Transportation Sector: What We Learn from a Bottom-Up Model
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
2008; 42 (22): 8202-8210
Abstract
Few integrated analysis models examine significant U.S. transportation greenhouse gas emission reductions within an integrated energy system. Our analysis, using a bottom-up MARKet ALocation (MARKAL) model, found that stringent system-wide CO2 reduction targets will be required to achieve significant CO2 reductions from the transportation sector. Mitigating transportation emission reductions can result in significant changes in personal vehicle technologies, increases in vehicle fuel efficiency, and decreases in overall transportation fuel use. We analyze policy-oriented mitigation strategies and suggest that mitigation policies should be informed by the transitional nature of technology adoptions and the interactions between the mitigation strategies, and the robustness of mitigation strategies to long-term reduction goals, input assumptions, and policy and social factors. More research is needed to help identify robust policies that will achieve the best outcome in the face of uncertainties.
View details for DOI 10.1021/es8005805
View details for Web of Science ID 000260921400008
View details for PubMedID 19068795
-
On the sources of technological change: What do the models assume?
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2008; 30 (2): 409-424
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.05.023
View details for Web of Science ID 000252784500013
-
A Critique of the Stern Review's Mitigation Cost Analyses and Integrated Assessment
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY
2008; 2 (1): 77-93
View details for DOI 10.1093/reep/rem022
View details for Web of Science ID 000273118300006
-
Comment on "Alternative measures of output in global economic-environmental models: Purchasing power parity or market exchange rates?" by William Nordhaus
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2007; 29 (3): 373-374
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.11.002
View details for Web of Science ID 000245753300002
-
On the sources of technological change: Assessing the evidence
Annual Workshop on Climate Change Impacts and Integrated Assessment
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV. 2006: 579–95
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.05.004
View details for Web of Science ID 000241307000004
-
Optimal technology R&D in the face of climate uncertainty
Conference on Adaptive Research and Governance in Climate Change
SPRINGER. 2006: 157–79
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9092-8
View details for Web of Science ID 000240484900007
-
Overview of EMF-21: Multigas mitigation and climate policy
ENERGY JOURNAL
2006: 1-32
View details for Web of Science ID 000245467100002
- EMF 21 Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy Francisco C. The Energy Journal Special Issue 2006
-
Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2006; 28 (1): 102-120
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2005.10.003
View details for Web of Science ID 000235259900006
-
Climate suitability for stable malaria transmission in Zimbabwe under different climate change scenarios
CLIMATIC CHANGE
2005; 73 (3): 375-393
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-6875-2
View details for Web of Science ID 000234482000007
-
Energy economics
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2005; 27 (4): 551-552
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2005.04.002
View details for Web of Science ID 000230797700001
-
Special Issue - EMF 19 Alternative Technology Strategies for Climate Change Policy
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2004; 26 (4): 501-515
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.019
View details for Web of Science ID 000224294300001
-
Untitled
ENERGY ECONOMICS
2004; 26 (1): V-VI
View details for DOI 10.1016/S0140-9883(03)00090-2
View details for Web of Science ID 000188081600001
- EMF OP 54 Shares, Gaps, and Economy's Response to Oil Disruption Stanford University 2004
- EMF OP 57 After the Natural Gas Bubble: An Economic Evaluation of the Recent U.S. National Petroleum Council Study Stanford University and Energy Journal April 2005 2004
- EMF OP 53 U.S. Carbon Emissions, Technological Process, and Economic Growth Since 1870 Stanford University 2004
-
Strategic decisions of new technology adoption under asymmetric information: A game-theoretic model
DECISION SCIENCES
2003; 34 (4): 643-675
View details for Web of Science ID 000187607700002
- EMF WP 20.2 Valuing a Medium-Scale Gas Fired Power Plant with Capacity Expansion Options Under a Competitive Environment Central Research Institute for the Electric Power Industry 2003
- EMF OP 55 Energy Security and Global Climate Change Mitigation Stanford University 2003
- EMF 20 Report: Natural Gas, Fuel Diversity, and North American Energy Markets Energy Modeling Forum EMF 20 Working Group 2003; 1
- EMF WP 20.3 Fuel Switching Potential of Electric Generators: A Case Study Stanford University 2003
- EMF WP 19.2 Environmental Technology Policy and Emerging Technologies Stanford University 2002
- EMF-17: Prices and Emissions in a Restructured Electricity Market Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 2002; 1
- EMF OP 52 Modeling Energy Markets and Climate Change Policy Stanford University and Encyclopedia of Energy 2002
- EMF OP 51 Energy Disruptions, Interfirm Price Effects, and the Aggregate Economy Stanford University and Energy Economics March 2003 2002; 25 (2)
- EMF WP 20.1 Study Design: Natural Gas, Fuel Diversity and American Energy Markets Stanford University 2002
-
Bn integrated assessment model to evaluate the potential effects of climate change on malaria in Zimbabwe
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. 2001: S29–S29
View details for Web of Science ID 000169334500096
-
An integrated assessment model to evaluate the potential effects of climate change on malaria in Zimbabwe.
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC. 2001: S136–S136
View details for Web of Science ID 000169006400463
-
A report on the EMF 19 study on technology and global climate change policies
5th International Conference on Greenshouse Gas Control Technologies
C S I R O. 2001: 1026–1031
View details for Web of Science ID 000184645800169
- EMF OP 50 The Asymmetric Effects of Changes in Price and Income on Energy and Oil Demand Stanford University and Energy Journal 2002 2001; 1 (23)
-
Approaches for performing uncertainty analysis in large-scale energy/economic policy models
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT
2000; 5 (1): 29-46
View details for Web of Science ID 000086464500004
- EMF OP 49 Projecting Energy Trends Into the New Century Stanford University and Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, EOLSS Publishers 2000
- Energy and Environmental Policy Modeling Kluwer Academic Press. 1999
- EMF WP 17.1 An International Comparison of Models for Measuring Market Power in Electricity Stanford University 1999
- EMF WP 14.5 Induced Technological Change in Climate Policy Modeling Stanford University and Environmental Modeling and Assessment 1999; 14 (2,3)
- EMF WP 14.4 Approaches for Performing Uncertainty Analysis in Large-Scale Energy/Economic Policy Models Stanford University and Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2000 1999; 5 (1)
- Discounting and Intergenerational Equity edited by Portney, Paul, R., Weyant, John, P. RFF Press. 1999
- The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol Energy Journal (special issue) 1999
-
SPECIAL ISSUE THE COSTS OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL: A MULTI-MODEL EVALUATION INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
ENERGY JOURNAL
1999: VII-XLIV
View details for Web of Science ID 000207324800002
-
Reducing carbon emissions using clean distributed resources
19th Annual North American IAEE/USAEE Conference on Technology Critical Role in Energy and Environmental Markets
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ENERGY ECONOMICS. 1998: 396–404
View details for Web of Science ID 000084536600044
- EMF-15: A Competitive Electricity Industry Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1998; 1
- EMF OP 43 Crude Oil Prices and U.S. Economic Performance: Where Does the Asymmetry Reside? Stanford University 1998
- Designing Competitive Electricity Markets Designing Competitive Electricity Markets edited by Chao, H., Huntington, H. 1998: 228
- Transmission Pricing Energy Modeling Forum Utilities Policy (Elsevier Science Ltd.) 1997; 3 (6)
- EMF SR 7 Quantifying Oil Disruption Risks Through Expert Judgment Stanford University 1997
- EMF OP 47 The IPCC Energy Assessment Stanford University and Energy Policy Special Issue: Energy and Greenhouse Has Mitigation: The IPCC Report and Beyond 1997; 24 (10/11)
- EMF OP 48 Preliminary Results from EMF 14 on Integrated Assessment of Climate Change Stanford University 1997
-
The IPCC energy assessment - Commentary
ENERGY POLICY
1996; 24 (10-11): 1005-1008
View details for Web of Science ID A1996VX50200012
- EMF OP 46 Insights from Integrated Assessment Stanford University 1996
- EMF-13: Markets for Energy Efficiency Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1996; 1
- EMF OP 44 Some Implications of Increased Cooperation in World Oil Conservation Stanford University; Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review, Second Quarter 1996
- EMF WP 14.2 Hedging Stratgies for Global Dioxide Abatement: A Summary of Pull Results - EMF 14 Subgroup Analysis for Decisions Under Uncertainty Stanford University 1996
- EMF WP 14.3 The Berlin Mandate: The Design of Cost-Effective Mitigation Strategies Stanford University 1996
- EMF OP 45 Testimony at the Hearings on U.S. Climate Change Stanford University 1996
- EMF SR 6 Computation of Electric Power Production Cost with Transmission Constraints Stanford University 1996
- EMF WP 14.1 Second Round Study for EMF 14: Integrated Assessment of Global Climate Change Energy Modeling Forum Stanford University 1995
- EMF OP 42 LDC Cooperation in World Oil Conservation Policies Stanford University; The Energy Journal Special 1994
- EMF-13: Markets for Energy Efficiency Energy Modeling Forum 1994; 2
- EMF OP 34 Oil Price Forecasting During the 1980s: What Went Wrong? Energy Journal 1994; 2 (15)
- EMF OP 41 Been Top Down So Long It Looks Like Bottom Up Stanford University; Energy Policy 1994; 10 (22)
- EMF OP 40 Assessing the Economic Cost of U.S. Oil Conservation Stanford University 1994
-
COSTS OF REDUCING GLOBAL CARBON EMISSIONS
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
1993; 7 (4): 27-46
View details for Web of Science ID A1993MJ53500003
-
MODEL COMPARISONS OF THE COSTS OF REDUCING CO2 EMISSIONS
105th Annual Meeting of the American-Economic-Association
AMER ECON ASSN. 1993: 318–23
View details for Web of Science ID A1993LC60700056
- EMF WP 12.15 Results from the U.S. Markal Model for EMF 12 Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.14 Results from the Jogensen-Wilcoxen Model - Reducing U.S. Carbon Emissions: An Econometric General Equilibrium Assessment Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.2 Study Design for EMF 12 Global Climate Change: Energy Sector Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emission Control Strategies Energy Modeling Forum Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.4 Decomposition of Carbon Emission Reduction Projections Stanford University 1993
- EMF OP 38 Costs of Reducing Global Carbon Emissions: An Overview Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.5 The Technology Group Analysis Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.3 Structural Comparison of EMF 12 Models Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.8 The Efficiency Value of Carbon Tax Revenues Stanford University 1993
- EMF OP 35 Limiting Oil Imports: Cost Estimates From a Range of U.S. Model Projections Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 13.3 Modeling Energy Technology Choices: Which Finance Tools Are Appropriate? Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.20 The Value of Cooperation in Abating Climate Change Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.19 Sorting Out Facts and Uncertainties in Economic Response Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.18 Results from the Gemini-Energy Environmental Model - Analyzing Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.17 Results from the ICF Global-Macro Model: Estimation of Costs to Meet the CO2 Emission Targets in the Energy Sector Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.16 Results from the TGAS Model - Is the Forecast for Carbon Taxes Forecast by TGAS an Outlier: Why the Forecasts by Other Models are Too Low Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.13 Results from the Edmonds-Reilly Model Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.12 Lessons for the Implementation of Policies to Mitigate Carbon Dioxide Emissions Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.6 The Transition to Reduced Levels of Carbon Emissions Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.21 Carbon Coalitions: The Cost and Effectiveness of Energy Agreements to Alter Trajectories of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Emission Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.10 Energy Security Impacts of Carbon Emission Reduction Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.9 The Distributional Impacts of a Carbon Tax Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 13.4 Models of Individual Energy Technology Choice: Their Implications for Energy Technology Market Participants and Policy-Makers Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.1 Global Climate Change: Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Control Strategies, Executive Summary Energy Modeling Forum Stanford University 1993
- EMF OP 37 EMF 12: Model Comparisons of the Costs of Reducing CO2 Emissions Darius Stanford University 1993
- EMF OP 39 Structural Comparison of the Models in EMF 12 Stanford University; Energy Policy 1993
- EMF SR 5 Comparative Analysis of Energy Intensity Between the U.S. and Japan Stanford University 1993
- EMF WP 12.7 Cost-Benefit Analysis and Climate Change Stanford University 1993
- EMF PP 7.4 A Selection of Possible Studies for the Energy Modeling Forum Stanford University 1992
- EMF WP 12.27 Technical Details for the Core Set of Models Participating in EMF 12 Stanford University 1992
- EMF OP 36 OECD Oil Demand: Estimated Response Surfaces for Nine World Oil Policy Models Stanford University 1992
- EMF WP 13.2 Back to Basics: Searching for Principles to Guide the Energy Conservation Policy Debate Stanford University 1992
- EMF WP 13.1 Projecting Energy Efficiency Improvement Potential: A Comparison of Methodologies Used in Six Recent Studies Stanford University 1992
- EMF WP 12.28 A Structural Comparison of Models Used in EMF 12 to Analyze the Costs of Policies for Reducing Energy Sector CO2 Emissions Stanford University 1992
- EMF WP 12.25 A Structural Comparison of Energy-Economy Models Used for Global Warming Policy Analysis Stanford University 1991
- EMF WP 12.26 Model Technical Summaries Stanford University 1991
- EMF OP 30 Emerging Competition in California Gas Markets EMF OP 30 Emerging Competition in California Gas Markets Stanford University 1991
- EMF OP 31 Economic Impacts of U.S. Oil Replacement Policies: Methodology and Results for the OTA Analysis Stanford University 1991
- EMF-11: International Oil Supplies and Demands Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1991
- EMF OP 33 A Comparison of Aggregate Energy Demand Models for Global Warming Policy Analyses Stanford University 1991
-
ENERGY ECONOMY MODELING - A SURVEY
ENERGY
1990; 15 (3-4): 387-394
View details for Web of Science ID A1990CZ82900023
-
INTEGRATED MODELS
ENERGY
1990; 15 (3-4): 341-344
View details for Web of Science ID A1990CZ82900019
-
POLICY MODELING - AN OVERVIEW
ENERGY
1990; 15 (3-4): 203-206
View details for Web of Science ID A1990CZ82900008
-
ENGINEERING ECONOMIC MODELING - ENERGY-SYSTEMS
ENERGY
1990; 15 (3-4): R5-R5
View details for Web of Science ID A1990CZ82900001
- EMF SR 4 Engineering-Economic Modeling: Energy Systems Energy - The International Journal 1990; 3/4 (15)
- EMF OP 29 Oil: Alternative Perspectives on the Decade Stanford University 1990
- EMF WP 10.2 The Roles of Analytical Models in National Electricity Policy Debates: Issues and Frontiers Stanford University 1990
- EMF WP 10.1 Electricity Market Players Subgroup Report Stanford University 1990
- EMF OP 32 Substitution Between Activities with Different Energy Intensities Resources and Energy 1990; 1 (13)
- EMF OP 27 The Effects of Changes in the Economic Structure on Energy Demand in the USSR and the US EA Medvedeva Stanford University 1990
- EMF OP 28 Whither Long Term Canada-U.S. Natural Gas Trade? A View from the (Modelling) Trenches Stanford University 1990
- EMF-9: North American Natural Gas Markets Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1989
- EMF WP 9.8 Database for EMF Study on North American Natural Gas Markets Energy Modeling Forum Stanford University 1989
- EMF OP 25 The Impact of Sectoral Shifts in Industry on U.S. Energy Demands Energy 1989
- EMF-9: North American Natural Gas Markets: Selected Technical Studies Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1989
- EMF SR 3 Survey of Utility Real-Time Pricing Projects in the U.S. Stanford University 1989
-
INDUSTRIAL ENERGY DEMAND - A SIMPLE STRUCTURAL APPROACH
RESOURCES AND ENERGY
1988; 10 (2): 111-133
View details for Web of Science ID A1988Q109600002
-
IS THERE POLICY-ORIENTED LEARNING IN THE ANALYSIS OF NATURAL-GAS POLICY ISSUES
POLICY SCIENCES
1988; 21 (2-3): 239-261
View details for Web of Science ID A1988Q549900005
- EMF OP 26 Energy and National Security: Should GNP Impacts Preclude Oil Tariffs? The Energy Journal 1988; 2 (9)
- EMF OP 22 Industrial Energy Demand: A Simple Structural Approach Resources and Energy 1988; 2 (10)
- EMF OP 24 The Energy Problem: A Real World Laboratory For the Empirical Economist Stanford University 1987
- EMF 8 Industrial Energy Demand Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1987
- EMF OP 23 EMF 8 Projections of U.S. Industrial Energy Demand Stanford University 1987
- EMF OP 20 The U.S. Dollar and the World Oil Market Energy Policy 1986
- EMF OP 21 The Oil Price Collapse and Growing American Vulnerability Stanford University 1986
-
GENERAL ECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM AS A UNIFYING CONCEPT IN ENERGY-ECONOMIC MODELING
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
1985; 31 (5): 548-563
View details for Web of Science ID A1985AJA4100004
- EMF OP 18 Oil Prices and Inflation Annual Review of Energy 1985; 10
- EMF OP 19 Using Data Analysis and Modeling in Planning Petroleum Management 1985; 7 (7)
- EMF SR 2 Application of Quantitative Methods for Energy-Economic Planning in Semisocialized Economies Stanford University 1985
-
THE CONTINUING THREAT OF OIL-SUPPLY INTERRUPTIONS
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT
1984; 3 (3): 393-405
View details for Web of Science ID A1984SR43700004
- EMF SR 1 Rate-of-Return Regulation and Efficiency: The Economics of the Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Industry Stanford University 1984
- EMF 7 Macroeconomic Impacts of Energy Shocks Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1984; 1
- EMF OP 11 Real Oil Prices During 1980-82 The Energy Journal 1984; 3 (5)
- EMF OP 17 The Response of Energy Demand to Higher Prices: What Have We Learned? Stanford University; The American Economic Review 1984; 2 (74)
- EMF OP 13 Optimal Supply of a Depletable Resource with a Backstop Technology: Heal's Theorem Revisited Stanford University 1984
- EMF OP 12 The Transition to Nondepletable Energy: Social Planning and Market Models of Capacity Expansion Stanford University 1984
-
THE IMPACT OF RISING OIL PRICES ON THE WORLD-ECONOMY - MATTHIESSEN,L (Book Review)
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE
1984; 22 (2): 628-630
View details for Web of Science ID A1984SX05100038
-
OPTIMAL OIL IMPORT TARIFFS - AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE FOR THE 1980S
ENERGY POLICY
1983; 11 (2): 101-118
View details for Web of Science ID A1983QQ86200002
- EMF PP 6.4 Energy Model Comparison: An Overview Large Scale Energy Models - Prospects and Potentials 1983
-
POLICIES TO REDUCE OECD VULNERABILITY TO OIL-SUPPLY DISRUPTIONS
ENERGY
1983; 8 (3): 199-211
View details for Web of Science ID A1983QP15900002
-
REDUCING DEPENDENCE ON OIL IMPORTS
ENERGY ECONOMICS
1982; 4 (1): 51-64
View details for Web of Science ID A1982MW11800006
- EMF PP 6.5 Modeling for Insights, Not Numbers: The Experiences of the Energy Modeling Forum OMEGA: The International Journal of the Management Sciences 1982
- EMF 6 World Oil Energy Modeling Forum 1982
-
MODELING FOR INSIGHTS, NOT NUMBERS - THE EXPERIENCES OF THE ENERGY MODELING FORUM
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
1982; 10 (5): 449-462
View details for Web of Science ID A1982PL09400002
- EMF PP 9.1 Testimony Stanford University 1981
- EMF OP 14.1 Will Oil Prices Collapse? The Magazine of Economic Affairs 1981; 5 (24)
-
OIL AND NATIONAL-SECURITY - AN INTEGRATED PROGRAM FOR SURVIVING AN OIL CRISIS
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY
1981; 6: 171-198
View details for Web of Science ID A1981MK04400006
-
MANAGING AN OIL BONANZA - AN ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE MEXICAN EXPORT POLICIES
ENERGY POLICY
1981; 9 (3): 186-196
View details for Web of Science ID A1981MD11100002
-
QUANTITATIVE MODELS IN ENERGY-POLICY
POLICY ANALYSIS
1980; 6 (2): 211-234
View details for Web of Science ID A1980JT34700005
- EMF 4 Aggregate Elasticity of Energy Demand Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1980
- EMF 5 U.S. Oil and Gas Supply Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1980
-
ENERGY-POLICY MODELING - SURVEY
OPERATIONS RESEARCH
1979; 27 (1): 1-36
View details for Web of Science ID A1979GL53600001
- EMF 3 Electric Load Forecasting: Probing the Issues with Models Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1979
- EMF PP 6.1 The Energy Modeling Forum: Past, Present and Future Stanford University and Energy Policy - The Global Challenge (Fall 1979) 1979
- EMF 2 Coal in Transition: 1980-2000 Energy Modeling Forum Energy Modeling Forum 1978
- EMF 1 Energy and Economy Energy Modeling Forum 1977; 2
- Markets for Energy Efficiency Energy Policy (Elsevier Science Ltd.) ; 10 (22)