Joseph Moore
Ph.D. Student in Education, admitted Autumn 2019
All Publications
-
Sacred Commitments in Secular Spaces: How Religious Students Engage in Boundary Work at an Elite University
SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION
2026
View details for DOI 10.1093/socrel/sraf039
View details for Web of Science ID 001663354300001
-
"I must have slipped through the cracks somehow": An examination of coping with perceived impostorism and the role of social support
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR
2019; 115
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103337
View details for Web of Science ID 000500641000024
-
Longitudinal relations between substance use abstinence motivations and substance use behaviors in adolescence: A self-determination theory approach.
Journal of personality
2019
Abstract
We employed self-determination theory (SDT) as a framework for examining longitudinal relations between adolescents' motivations to abstain from substances and their subsequent substance use.Participants were 475 adolescents in the United States. The data came from annual surveys following adolescents from age 16 to 19. The measures included self-reports of controlled and autonomous motivations to abstain from substances, as well as substance use frequency.We used structural equation modeling to estimate autoregressive cross-lagged models of controlled and autonomous abstinence motivations predicting substance use a year later (with 3 years of data on abstinence motivations and 4 years of data on substance use). Autonomous motivation predicted decreases in substance use, while controlled motivation predicted increases. Follow-up analyses also revealed that relations between abstinence motivations and substance use increase in strength with greater time lags, and decreases in autonomous abstinence motivation partially mediate the link between controlled abstinence motivation and later substance use.This study demonstrated the usefulness of SDT in understanding motivations to abstain from substance use during adolescence. In line with this theoretical approach, autonomous motivations for abstinence were adaptive while controlled motivations for abstinence were maladaptive.
View details for DOI 10.1111/jopy.12522
View details for PubMedID 31651040