Julian Nyarko
Professor of Law and Senior Fellow at the Stanford Institute for HAI
Stanford Law School
Academic Appointments
-
Professor, Stanford Law School
-
Senior Fellow, Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI)
Program Affiliations
-
Symbolic Systems Program
2024-25 Courses
- Contracts
LAW 205 (Aut) -
Independent Studies (1)
- Independent Study
SYMSYS 196 (Aut, Win, Spr, Sum)
- Independent Study
-
Prior Year Courses
2023-24 Courses
- Contracts
LAW 205 (Aut) - Learning from Evidence
LAW 7520 (Win)
2022-23 Courses
- Contracts
LAW 205 (Aut) - Learning from Evidence
LAW 7520 (Win)
2021-22 Courses
- Contracts
LAW 205 (Aut)
- Contracts
All Publications
-
Introducing a New Corpus of Definitive M&A Agreements, 2000-2020
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES
2024
View details for DOI 10.1111/jels.12410
View details for Web of Science ID 001387455600001
-
Risk scores, label bias, everything but the kitchen sink.
Science advances
2024; 10 (13): eadi8411
Abstract
In designing risk assessment algorithms, many scholars promote a "kitchen sink" approach, reasoning that more information yields more accurate predictions. We show, however, that this rationale often fails when algorithms are trained to predict a proxy of the true outcome, for instance, predicting arrest as a proxy for criminal behavior. With this "label bias," one should exclude a feature if its correlation with the proxy and its correlation with the true outcome have opposite signs, conditional on the other model features. This criterion is often satisfied when a feature is weakly correlated with the true outcome, and, additionally, that feature and the true outcome are both direct causes of the proxy outcome. For example, criminal behavior and geography may be weakly correlated and, due to patterns of police deployment, direct causes of one's arrest record-suggesting that excluding geography in criminal risk assessment will weaken an algorithm's performance in predicting arrest but will improve its capacity to predict actual crime.
View details for DOI 10.1126/sciadv.adi8411
View details for PubMedID 38552013
-
Designing equitable algorithms.
Nature computational science
2023; 3 (7): 601-610
Abstract
Predictive algorithms are now commonly used to distribute society's resources and sanctions. But these algorithms can entrench and exacerbate inequities. To guard against this possibility, many have suggested that algorithms be subject to formal fairness constraints. Here we argue, however, that popular constraints-while intuitively appealing-often worsen outcomes for individuals in marginalized groups, and can even leave all groups worse off. We outline a more holistic path forward for improving the equity of algorithmically guided decisions.
View details for DOI 10.1038/s43588-023-00485-4
View details for PubMedID 38177749
-
Designing equitable algorithms
NATURE COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE
2023; 3 (7): 601-610
View details for DOI 10.1038/s43588-023-00485-4
View details for Web of Science ID 001035781100010
-
Racial bias as a multi-stage, multi-actor problem: An analysis of pretrial detention
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES
2023
View details for DOI 10.1111/jels.12343
View details for Web of Science ID 000910125100001
-
Do Judges Matter?
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT
2023; 179 (1): 247-249
View details for DOI 10.1628/jite-2023-0021
View details for Web of Science ID 000925424100022
-
LEGALBENCH: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models
NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS (NIPS). 2023
View details for Web of Science ID 001226352803033
-
Don't Use a Cannon to Kill a Fly: An Efficient Cascading Pipeline for Long Documents
ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY. 2023: 141-147
View details for DOI 10.1145/3594536.3595142
View details for Web of Science ID 001139079400015
-
Conceptual Questions in Developing Expert-Annotated Data
ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY. 2023: 427-431
View details for DOI 10.1145/3594536.3595139
View details for Web of Science ID 001139079400049
-
Natural Language Processing in Legal Tech
LEGAL TECH AND THE FUTURE OF CIVIL JUSTICE
2023: 70-90
View details for Web of Science ID 001003618200004
-
Contractual Evolution
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW
2022; 89 (4): 901-978
View details for Web of Science ID 000811187200002
-
Regulatory Diffusion
STANFORD LAW REVIEW
2022; 74 (5): 897-968
View details for Web of Science ID 000827125000001
-
Police agencies on Facebook overreport on Black suspects.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
2022; 119 (45): e2203089119
Abstract
A large and growing share of the American public turns to Facebook for news. On this platform, reports about crime increasingly come directly from law enforcement agencies, raising questions about content curation. We gathered all posts from almost 14,000 Facebook pages maintained by US law enforcement agencies, focusing on reporting about crime and race. We found that Facebook users are exposed to posts that overrepresent Black suspects by 25 percentage points relative to local arrest rates. This overexposure occurs across crime types and geographic regions and increases with the proportion of both Republican voters and non-Black residents. Widespread exposure to overreporting risks reinforcing racial stereotypes about crime and exacerbating punitive preferences among the polity more generally.
View details for DOI 10.1073/pnas.2203089119
View details for PubMedID 36322743
-
A Statistical Test for Legal Interpretation: Theory and Applications
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION
2021
View details for DOI 10.1093/jleo/ewab038
View details for Web of Science ID 000764828800001
-
Stickiness and Incomplete Contracts
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW
2021; 88 (1): 1–79
View details for Web of Science ID 000607450500001
-
Blind Justice: Algorithmically Masking Race in Charging Decisions
ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY. 2021: 35-45
View details for DOI 10.1145/3461702.3462524
View details for Web of Science ID 000767973400006
-
A COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF CONSTITUTIONAL POLARIZATION
CORNELL LAW REVIEW
2020; 105 (1): 1–84
View details for Web of Science ID 000594813500001
-
Conforming against Expectations: The Formalism of Nonlawyers at the World Trade Organization
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES
2019; 48 (2): 341–75
View details for DOI 10.1086/702167
View details for Web of Science ID 000507294200004