Kriti Gupta
Clinical Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine
Clinical Assistant Professor (By courtesy), Pediatrics
Bio
I am a pediatric emergency medicine attending physician with a focus on clinical simulation. My current responsibilities include leading PEM fellow simulations and pediatric resident simulations.
My interests include use of artificial intelligence in creating simulation scenarios, psychological safety in simulations, and creation of a human factors simulation curriculum. I am also passionate about bringing simulation as a form of medical education within the global health sector.
I am currently a physician co-lead for a sepsis clinical pathway in the pediatric ED.
Clinical Focus
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Academic Appointments
-
Clinical Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine
-
Clinical Assistant Professor (By courtesy), Pediatrics
Honors & Awards
-
Best Case Report, American Academy of Pediatrics (10/20/2023)
-
Best Abstract, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (1/15/2024)
Boards, Advisory Committees, Professional Organizations
-
Member, American Academy of Pediatrics (2024 - Present)
-
Member, International Pediatric Simulation Society (2025 - Present)
-
Member, Society for Simulation in Healthcare (2024 - Present)
-
Member, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (2025 - Present)
Professional Education
-
Medical Education: New York Medical College (2018) NY
-
Fellowship, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Clinical Simulation (2025)
-
Board Certification: American Board of Pediatrics, Pediatric Emergency Medicine (2025)
-
Fellowship: New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital (2024) NY
-
Board Certification: American Board of Pediatrics, Pediatrics (2021)
-
Residency: Cohen Childrens Medical Center Pediatric Residency (2021) NY
Community and International Work
-
Pediatric Clerkship Faculty, Rwanda
Topic
Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Partnering Organization(s)
University of Global Health Equity
Populations Served
Medical students in Rwanda
Location
International
Ongoing Project
Yes
Opportunities for Student Involvement
Yes
Research Interests
-
Curriculum and Instruction
-
Professional Development
-
Technology and Education
Current Research and Scholarly Interests
I am currently working on a research project comparing ChatGPT-written pediatric emergency simulation scenarios with those written by physicians. I am beginning research that explores AI-based simulation evaluation tools.
All Publications
-
Artificial Intelligence in Simulation Design: The Effectiveness of a Customized Artificial Intelligence-based Scenario Development Tool.
Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
2026
Abstract
The creation of simulation scenarios is typically time-consuming and requires a high cognitive load. Artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) can generate text, including simulation scenarios, but the output quality can be very user-dependent. The goal of this study is to explore if a customized version of ChatGPT can create simulation scenarios that are comparable to those written by humans.In this observational cross-sectional study, simulation content experts scored 8 scenarios covering 4 pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) topics with one version written by health care educators and published on MedEdPORTAL, and another by a custom ChatGPT. Experts were blinded to the source of each case. The scenarios were assessed in 3 ways: an objective score from an established simulation scoring checklist, a subjective quality rating, and whether the experts would recommend the scenario for use.Seven experts with an average of 11 years of PEM training and an average of 10 years of simulation work scored simulations. While all 4 AI-generated cases had lower average scores on both quantitative assessments than their human-written counterparts, these results were not statistically significant. The majority of experts recommended each case to colleagues, regardless of source. There was moderate to excellent intrarater reliability.Human-written cases received higher scores than the AI-written cases. While these scores were not statistically significant, these differences highlight the importance of keeping a human-expert influence when using AI to produce simulation cases. This ChatGPT tool can therefore be useful in assisting in the timely creation of scenarios, allowing facilitators, regardless of their technical skill with AI, to decrease cognitive load. Next steps should move beyond evaluating the scenario text to include evaluation of the experience of facilitating the ChatGPT-derived pediatric simulations as well as assessing the perspectives of simulation operators.
View details for DOI 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000953
View details for PubMedID 42623308
-
Vague Abdominal Pain in Pubertal Females: Beyond the Usual Culprits.
Clinical pediatrics
2024; 63 (11): 1615-1619
View details for DOI 10.1177/00099228241234964
View details for PubMedID 38415600
-
Measles: taking steps forward to prevent going backwards.
Current opinion in pediatrics
2020; 32 (3): 436-445
Abstract
The measles vaccine, first introduced in 1963, directly led to a dramatic decrease in the incidence of the disease. Measles transitioned from being a common childhood disease, affecting approximately three to four million children annually, to being eradicated in the United States in 2000. What was once an astounding victory for modern medicine, however, has recently seen a dramatic reversal in fortune, with a resurgence of measles cases in the United States. Hence, it merits careful discussion.The United States has seen more measles cases in 2019 than in any prior year in the past 30 years. These outbreaks are because of many factors but a significant cause is the increase in vaccine refusal within sub-populations in America. This finding indicates that the current approach that healthcare workers take with families towards MMR vaccination could be more effective.This article aims to educate the reader about the measles virus and its clinical presentation, the MMR vaccine and its overwhelming success, and the concerning current national and international trends in measles outbreaks. Importantly, we focus on positions proposed by hesitant vaccinators and determine how medical providers can participate in productive conversation about vaccination to better gain trust and guide improved shared clinical decision-making.
View details for DOI 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000895
View details for PubMedID 32374581
-
Prevalence of Continuous Pulse Oximetry Monitoring in Hospitalized Children With Bronchiolitis Not Requiring Supplemental Oxygen.
JAMA
2020; 323 (15): 1467-1477
Abstract
US national guidelines discourage the use of continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in hospitalized children with bronchiolitis who do not require supplemental oxygen.Measure continuous pulse oximetry use in children with bronchiolitis.A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed in pediatric wards in 56 US and Canadian hospitals in the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings Network from December 1, 2018, through March 31, 2019. Participants included a convenience sample of patients aged 8 weeks through 23 months with bronchiolitis who were not receiving active supplemental oxygen administration. Patients with extreme prematurity, cyanotic congenital heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, home respiratory support, neuromuscular disease, immunodeficiency, or cancer were excluded.Hospitalization with bronchiolitis without active supplemental oxygen administration.The primary outcome, receipt of continuous pulse oximetry, was measured using direct observation. Continuous pulse oximetry use percentages were risk standardized using the following variables: nighttime (11 pm to 7 am), age combined with preterm birth, time after weaning from supplemental oxygen or flow, apnea or cyanosis during the present illness, neurologic impairment, and presence of an enteral feeding tube.The sample included 3612 patient observations in 33 freestanding children's hospitals, 14 children's hospitals within hospitals, and 9 community hospitals. In the sample, 59% were male, 56% were white, and 15% were black; 48% were aged 8 weeks through 5 months, 28% were aged 6 through 11 months, 16% were aged 12 through 17 months, and 9% were aged 18 through 23 months. The overall continuous pulse oximetry monitoring use percentage in these patients, none of whom were receiving any supplemental oxygen or nasal cannula flow, was 46% (95% CI, 40%-53%). Hospital-level unadjusted continuous pulse oximetry use ranged from 2% to 92%. After risk standardization, use ranged from 6% to 82%. Intraclass correlation coefficient suggested that 27% (95% CI, 19%-36%) of observed variation was attributable to unmeasured hospital-level factors.In a convenience sample of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis who were not receiving active supplemental oxygen administration, monitoring with continuous pulse oximetry was frequent and varied widely among hospitals. Because of the apparent absence of a guideline- or evidence-based indication for continuous monitoring in this population, this practice may represent overuse.
View details for DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.2998
View details for PubMedID 32315058
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC7175084
-
Adiposity in Children with Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis (JPsA)
WILEY-BLACKWELL. 2015
View details for Web of Science ID 000370860202741