Lanhee Chen
David & Diane Steffy Fellow in American Public Policy Studies, Hoover Inst., HOOVER RESEARCH
Bio
Lanhee J. Chen, Ph.D. is the David and Diane Steffy Fellow in American Public Policy Studies at the Hoover Institution, Director of Domestic Policy Studies in the Public Policy Program, and an Affiliate of the Freeman-Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. He is also a presidentially-appointed and Senate-confirmed member of the independent and bipartisan Social Security Advisory Board.
Chen is a veteran of several high-profile U.S. political campaigns and served as policy director for Governor Mitt Romney’s 2012 bid for the presidency. In that role, he was Romney’s chief policy adviser; a senior strategist on the campaign; and the person responsible for developing the campaign’s domestic and foreign policy. Previously, Chen served as a senior appointee at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services during the George W. Bush Administration, in private law practice at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, and has advised numerous other presidential, gubernatorial, and congressional campaigns.
Chen earned his Ph.D. and A.M. in political science from Harvard University, his J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School, and his A.B. magna cum laude in government from Harvard College.
Academic Appointments
-
David & Diane Steffy Fellow in American Public Policy Studies, Hoover Inst., HOOVER RESEARCH
Administrative Appointments
-
Director of Domestic Policy Studies, Public Policy Program (2015 - Present)
-
Member, Faculty Steering Committee, Haas Center for Public Service (2015 - Present)
Boards, Advisory Committees, Professional Organizations
-
Member, State Bar of California (2008 - Present)
-
Member, Board of Directors, El Camino Hospital (2015 - Present)
-
Member, Social Security Advisory Board (2015 - Present)
Program Affiliations
-
Public Policy
2026-27 Courses
- Political Analysis for Public Policymakers
PUBLPOL 308 (Win) -
Prior Year Courses
2025-26 Courses
- Political Analysis for Public Policymakers
PUBLPOL 308 (Win)
2024-25 Courses
- Political Analysis for Public Policymakers
PUBLPOL 308 (Win)
2023-24 Courses
- Political Analysis for Public Policymakers
PUBLPOL 308 (Win)
- Political Analysis for Public Policymakers
All Publications
-
Refocusing Medicare Reform on Its Cost to Taxpayers.
JAMA health forum
2026; 7 (8): e263867
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2026.3867
View details for PubMedID 42623106
-
Enhancing Prescription Drug Affordability Through Competition.
JAMA health forum
2026; 7 (5): e262223
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2026.2223
View details for PubMedID 42166173
-
Failing to Account for Real-World Complexities in Health Policy.
JAMA health forum
2026; 7 (2): e260267
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2026.0267
View details for PubMedID 41642582
-
Alternatives to Government-Imposed Price Controls to Lower US Drug Prices.
JAMA health forum
2025; 6 (10): e255744
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.5744
View details for PubMedID 41129168
-
The Problem With California's Plan to Contain Health Care Costs.
JAMA health forum
2025; 6 (7): e253383
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3383
View details for PubMedID 40638131
-
Health Policy Challenges for 2025 and Beyond.
JAMA health forum
2025; 6 (1): e250184
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0184
View details for PubMedID 39883473
-
What Would a Trump Administration 2.0 Mean for Health Care Policy?
JAMA health forum
2024; 5 (10): e244057
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4057
View details for PubMedID 39388142
-
The Unintended and Anticompetitive Consequences of Laws to Control Health Care Costs.
JAMA health forum
2024; 5 (6): e242470
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2470
View details for PubMedID 38935366
-
Early Lessons From State-Based Public Option Plans.
JAMA health forum
2024; 5 (3): e240973
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0973
View details for PubMedID 38546624
-
Individual Health Accounts Can Bring Health Savings to More People in the US.
JAMA health forum
2023; 4 (8): e233468
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3468
View details for PubMedID 37615963
-
When Expansion Is Not Enough-State Innovation to Build Choice and Consumer Control in Medicaid.
JAMA health forum
2023; 4 (5): e231802
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1802
View details for PubMedID 37166809
-
Getting Ready For Health Reform 2020: Republicans' Options For Improving Upon The State Innovation Approach
HEALTH AFFAIRS
2018; 37 (12): 2076–83
View details for DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05119
View details for Web of Science ID 000463969300024
-
Getting Ready For Health Reform 2020: Republicans' Options For Improving Upon The State Innovation Approach.
Health affairs (Project Hope)
2018: 101377hlthaff201805119
Abstract
The 2020 presidential election will be consequential for the future of health reform, with the two major-party nominees taking very different views on the future of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), as well as the policies needed to lower health costs and continue to expand access to coverage. The Republican nominee will likely signal broad opposition to the ACA and a desire to replace it with a state innovation-based approach to reform, based on the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson legislation considered by the Senate in the fall of 2017. This article takes that legislation as a starting point, contextualizes it within the broader health reform discussion, and suggests ways to improve upon it to enhance the affordability of and access to coverage and to ensure that states have adequate flexibility to implement their policy goals.
View details for PubMedID 30444425