Clinical Focus


  • Pediatric Cardiology

Academic Appointments


Professional Education


  • Fellowship: Stanford University Pediatric Cardiology Fellowship (2025) CA
  • Board Certification: American Board of Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology (2024)
  • Fellowship: Stanford University Pediatric Cardiology Fellowship (2024) CA
  • Board Certification: American Board of Pediatrics, Pediatrics (2021)
  • Residency: UCSF Pediatric Residency (2021) CA
  • Medical Education: St Louis University School of Medicine (2018) MO
  • Advanced Imaging Fellowship, Stanford University, Fetal echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and transthoracic echocardiography (2025)
  • Pediatric Cardiology Fellowship, Stanford University (2024)
  • Pediatric Residency, University of California San Francisco (2021)
  • MD, Saint Louis University School of Medicine (2018)
  • BSEd, University of Virginia, Kinesiology (2014)

All Publications


  • Current status and improvement opportunities for onboarding paediatric acute care cardiology advanced practice providers. Cardiology in the young Hunter-Adamson, L., Birely, A., Neal, A. E., Patel, S. S., Kipps, A. K. 2025: 1-6

    Abstract

    Specialised training opportunities in paediatric cardiology are rare for advanced practice providers, creating an educational gap for novice practitioners. Standardised curricula have been cited as a beneficial intervention to optimally prepare these providers for highly specialised fields. We sought to understand the current onboarding practices of advanced practice providers in paediatric acute care cardiology to identify opportunities for curricular improvement.A survey developed by a task force by the Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology Collaborative (PAC3) was distributed across PAC3 programmes in May 2023 to evaluate the onboarding practices of advanced practice providers at paediatric heart centres nationwide.Survey responses reflected orienting practices at 19 paediatric heart centres representing varying programme and team sizes. Of the respondents, 32% felt their current model does not meet all the needs of the new team member. Key successful onboarding elements included a structured curriculum with goals and objectives, dedicated education time and materials, standardised assessments, and individualised learning in the presence of a supportive team. All respondents agreed that an online curriculum would be beneficial.There is no national standardised educational pathway for advanced practice providers entering paediatric acute care cardiology practice. There are opportunities to develop a formalised curriculum with structured learner assessment at a national level, which could be modified at the institution or learner level to enhance current onboarding practices.

    View details for DOI 10.1017/S1047951125001866

    View details for PubMedID 40394732

  • Echogenomics: Echocardiography in Heritable Aortopathies. Current cardiology reports Hunter-Adamson, L., Tierney, S. 2024

    Abstract

    The aim of this article is to review the current echocardiographic considerations in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with inherited aortopathies.Aortic dilation is a key feature in heritable aortopathies, and dissection is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. New genetic and histopathologic findings are helpful in better understanding these conditions. Non-invasive imaging modalities, including echocardiogram, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, are essential in monitoring these patients, as well as providing new prognostic factors of arterial stiffness that may help with risk stratification in the future. Diagnosis of heritable aortopathies should be considered with identification of aortic root dilation, particularly in children and young adults, or when there is a family history of aortic disease. Recent adult consensus guidelines highlight the importance of underlying genotype and phenotypic features when considering prophylactic surgical intervention. There are currently no consensus pediatric guidelines.

    View details for DOI 10.1007/s11886-024-02024-7

    View details for PubMedID 38372858

    View details for PubMedCentralID 7217141

  • Extracardiac Fontan Fenestration Device Closure with Amplatzer Vascular Plug II and Septal Occluder: Procedure Results and Medium-Term Follow-Up. Pediatric cardiology Webb, M. K., Hunter, L. E., Kremer, T. R., Huddleston, C. B., Fiore, A. C., Danon, S. 2020; 41 (4): 703-708

    Abstract

    The objective of this study was to determine medium-term morbidity and mortality of patients who have undergone device closure of an extracardiac Fontan fenestration with an Amplatzer Vascular Plug II (AVPII) or Septal Occluder (ASO). A secondary objective was to compare medium-term morbidity and mortality between these patients and other fenestrated Fontan patients. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent an extracardiac fenestrated Fontan procedure between 1992 and 2015 at Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center. Procedural and follow-up data were obtained and compared between those who underwent fenestration closure and those who did not. Additional outcome measures included whether the fenestration had spontaneously closed, morbidity and mortality, oxygen saturations, and hemodynamics pre- and post-closure. Fifty-nine of 118 patients (50%) with a fenestrated Fontan underwent 60 device closures of the fenestration. Thirty-two (53%) of these were with the AVPII and 28 (47%) with the ASO. There was one device embolization. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, five patients suffered morbidity, including 2 with arrhythmias, 1 with plastic bronchitis, 1 with protein losing enteropathy, and 1 with stroke. There were no cardiopulmonary deaths in this group. Twenty-three of 118 patients (19%) had spontaneous closure. There was no difference in morbidity and mortality between patients who underwent percutaneous fenestration closure and those who either had spontaneous closure or a persistently patent fenestration. Device closure of Fontan fenestrations is a safe and effective procedure with minimal morbidity and mortality comparable to other patients with fenestrations.

    View details for DOI 10.1007/s00246-019-02283-0

    View details for PubMedID 31894396