Meira Levinson
Professor of Education and, by courtesy, of Political Science
Graduate School of Education
Academic Appointments
-
Professor, Graduate School of Education
-
Professor (By courtesy), Political Science
Stanford Advisees
-
Master's Program Advisor
Sean Hu
All Publications
-
Reprint: Moral Injury and the Ethics of Educational Injustice
HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW
2025; 95 (2)
View details for Web of Science ID 001585737800009
-
It changes again...
THEORY AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATION
2024; 22 (2): 164-171
View details for DOI 10.1177/14778785241258523
View details for Web of Science ID 001237669400001
-
Philosophical Reflections on Teachers' Ethical Dilemmas in a Global Pandemic
STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION
2025; 44 (2): 187-207
View details for DOI 10.1007/s11217-024-09937-4
View details for Web of Science ID 001208202200001
-
The Ethics of World-Building in Normative Case Studies
EDUCATIONAL THEORY
2024; 74 (3): 293-300
View details for DOI 10.1111/edth.12612
View details for Web of Science ID 001130561200001
-
We need a field of educational ethics
THEORY AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATION
2023; 21 (2): 197-215
View details for DOI 10.1177/14778785231187193
View details for Web of Science ID 001025317700001
-
"The power of open dialogue": Using normative case studies to facilitate ethical dilemmas discussions among school teachers
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION
2023; 132
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104237
View details for Web of Science ID 001034458200001
-
Social Determinants of Learning: Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice
AERA OPEN
2023; 9
View details for DOI 10.1177/23328584231206087
View details for Web of Science ID 001090955200001
-
Conceptions of Educational Equity
AERA OPEN
2022; 8
View details for DOI 10.1177/23328584221121344
View details for Web of Science ID 000859968700001
-
Health Equity, Schooling Hesitancy, and the Social Determinants of Learning
LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-AMERICAS
2021; 2: 100032
Abstract
At least 62 million K-12 students in North America-disproportionately low-income children of color- have been physically out of school for over a year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These children are at risk of significant academic, social, mental, and physical harm now and in the long-term. We review the literature about school safety and the conditions that shape families' and teachers' choices to return to in-person schooling. We identify four causes of schooling hesitancy in the U.S. even where schools can be safely reopened: high community transmission rates; the politicization of school re-openings; long-term racialized disinvestment in urban districts; and parents' rational calculations about their family's vulnerability due to the social determinants of health. Given the deep interconnections between the social determinants of health and of learning, and between schooling hesitancy and community vulnerability, stark inequities in in-person schooling access and take-up are likely to persist. We recommend that school districts invest in scientifically-based facilities upgrades, increased nursing and counseling staffing, and preparation for schools to serve as pediatric vaccination sites. School districts should also apply lessons from public health about addressing vaccine hesitancy to the challenge of schooling hesitancy by investing time in humble listening to parents and teachers about their concerns.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100032
View details for Web of Science ID 000886648300018
View details for PubMedID 36588583
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9790768
-
Reopening Primary Schools during the Pandemic.
The New England journal of medicine
2020; 383 (10): 981-985
View details for DOI 10.1056/NEJMms2024920
View details for PubMedID 32726550
-
The ethics of risk displacement in research and public policy
BIOETHICS
2020; 34 (9): 918-922
Abstract
We identify three distinct ethical problems that can arise with risk displacement. Risk displacement is the shifting of extant risk from one or more individuals to other individual(s) such that the reduction of risk to the first group is causally implicated in increasing risk to the second group. These problems are: concentration of risk in inequitable ways; transfer of risk to already vulnerable or disadvantaged populations; and exercise of undue influence over potential research participants. The first two arise in both public policy and research initiatives, whereas the third is a special concern that only applies to research initiatives. We argue that when one or more of these is of high magnitude, then the study or policy intervention may be ethically wrong. Finally, we conclude that although some risk displacement is ethically permissible, researchers and policymakers still have ethical reasons to reduce the magnitude of these problems.
View details for DOI 10.1111/bioe.12726
View details for Web of Science ID 000518581100001
View details for PubMedID 32090354
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8287306
-
Demoralized: Why Teachers Leave the Profession They Love and How They Can Stay (Book Review)
EDUCATIONAL THEORY
2019; 69 (3): 341-354
View details for Web of Science ID 000505315500005
-
Polarization, Partisanship, and Civic Education
PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES ON MORAL AND CIVIC EDUCATION: SHAPING CITIZENS AND THEIR SCHOOLS
edited by Macleod, C., Tappolet, C.
2019: 86-112
View details for Web of Science ID 000587722000006
-
Teaching Democracy in POLARIZING TIMES
EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
2017; 75 (3): 62-67
View details for Web of Science ID 000436524400013
-
The ethics of biosafety considerations in gain-of-function research resulting in the creation of potential pandemic pathogens.
Journal of medical ethics
2015; 41 (11): 901-8
Abstract
This paper proposes an ethical framework for evaluating biosafety risks of gain-of-function (GOF) experiments that create novel strains of influenza expected to be virulent and transmissible in humans, so-called potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs). Such research raises ethical concerns because of the risk that accidental release from a laboratory could lead to extensive or even global spread of a virulent pathogen. Biomedical research ethics has focused largely on human subjects research, while biosafety concerns about accidental infections, seen largely as a problem of occupational health, have been ignored. GOF/PPP research is an example of a small but important class of research where biosafety risks threaten public health, well beyond the small number of persons conducting the research.We argue that bioethical principles that ordinarily apply only to human subjects research should also apply to research that threatens public health, even if, as in GOF/PPP studies, the research involves no human subjects. Specifically we highlight the Nuremberg Code's requirements of 'fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods', and proportionality of risk and humanitarian benefit, as broad ethical principles that recur in later documents on research ethics and should also apply to certain types of research not involving human subjects. We address several potential objections to this view, and conclude with recommendations for bringing these ethical considerations into policy development.
View details for DOI 10.1136/medethics-2014-102619
View details for PubMedID 26320212
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC4623968
-
No justice, no teachers: Theorizing less-unjust teacher firings in Los Angeles Unified
THEORY AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATION
2015; 13 (2): 139-154
View details for DOI 10.1177/1477878514566556
View details for Web of Science ID 000437802800001
-
Moral Injury and the Ethics of Educational Injustice
HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW
2015; 85 (2): 61-86
View details for Web of Science ID 000356399900003
-
The ethics of pandering in Boston Public Schools' school assignment plan
THEORY AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATION
2015; 13 (1): 38-55
View details for DOI 10.1177/1477878515569034
View details for Web of Science ID 000437801300004
-
What Is Wrong With Grade Inflation (if Anything)?
PAIDEUSIS-THE JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION SOCIETY
2015; 23 (1): 3-21
View details for Web of Science ID 000376567300002
-
Reply to Critics: A Citizen for All Seasons? The Promises and Perils of a Trans-Ideological Vision of Civic Empowerment
edited by Gauthier, J.
PHILOSOPHY DOCUMENTATION CTR. 2015: 183-193
View details for DOI 10.5840/socphiltoday201551814
View details for Web of Science ID 000371443500016
-
Response to the Review Symposium of <i>No Citizen Left Behind</i>
STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION
2013; 32 (6): 667-670
View details for DOI 10.1007/s11217-013-9368-1
View details for Web of Science ID 000325889800008
-
R&D: Prepare students to be citizens
PHI DELTA KAPPAN
2012; 93 (7): 66-69
View details for DOI 10.1177/003172171209300716
View details for Web of Science ID 000302673000019
-
Democracy, accountability, and education
THEORY AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATION
2011; 9 (2): 125-144
View details for DOI 10.1177/1477878511409622
View details for Web of Science ID 000437787700002
-
'Let Us Now Praise ... ' Rethinking Role Models and Heroes in an Egalitarian Age
PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION IN THE ERA OF GLOBALIZATION
edited by Raley, Y., Preyer, G.
2009: 129-161
View details for Web of Science ID 000274060700009
-
Common schools and multicultural education
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
2007; 41 (4): 625-642
View details for DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00587.x
View details for Web of Science ID 000253480100009
-
Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation and What We Can Do About It
DEMOCRACY AT RISK: HOW POLITICAL CHOICES UNDERMINE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT
2005: 1-228
View details for Web of Science ID 000302219200007
-
Conclusion: Assessing Our Political Science of Citizenship
DEMOCRACY AT RISK: HOW POLITICAL CHOICES UNDERMINE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT
2005: 155–78
View details for Web of Science ID 000302219200006
-
Associational Life and the Nonprofit and Philanthropic Sector
DEMOCRACY AT RISK: HOW POLITICAL CHOICES UNDERMINE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT
2005: 117–54
View details for Web of Science ID 000302219200005
-
The American Metropolis
DEMOCRACY AT RISK: HOW POLITICAL CHOICES UNDERMINE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT
2005: 67–116
View details for Web of Science ID 000302219200004
-
Toward a Political Science of Citizenship
DEMOCRACY AT RISK: HOW POLITICAL CHOICES UNDERMINE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT
2005: 1–20
View details for Web of Science ID 000302219200002
-
National Electoral Processes
DEMOCRACY AT RISK: HOW POLITICAL CHOICES UNDERMINE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT
2005: 21–66
View details for Web of Science ID 000302219200003
-
Democracy at Risk How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation and What We Can Do About It PREFACE
DEMOCRACY AT RISK: HOW POLITICAL CHOICES UNDERMINE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT
2005: VII-+
View details for Web of Science ID 000302219200001
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-7534