Nicholas Bloom

All Publications

• The Diffusion of New Technologies* QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Kalyani, A., Bloom, N., Carvalho, M., Hassan, T., Lerner, J., Tahoun, A. 2025

  View details for DOI 10.1093/qje/qjaf002

  View details for Web of Science ID 001454498500001

• The Impact of Covid-19 on Productivity REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Mizen, P., Smietanka, P., Thwaites, G. 2025; 107 (1): 28-41

  View details for DOI 10.1162/rest_a_01298

  View details for Web of Science ID 001389681400016

• How working from home reshapes cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Ramani, A., Alecdo, J., Bloom, N. 2024; 121 (45): e2408930121

  Abstract

  In recent decades, economic activity has become increasingly concentrated in major global metropolises. Yet, the rise of working from home threatens this dominance of cities. Using multiple high-frequency datasets on spending, commuting, migration, and housing, we provide global evidence that remote work has dispersed economic activity away from city centers. We label this the "Donut Effect," which is much larger and more persistent in cities with high levels of remote work. Using detailed household microdata from the United States, we show that three-fifths of households that left city centers in big cities moved to the suburbs of the same city. This is likely explained by the rise of hybrid work, in which employees still commute to the office a few days a week. The enduring popularity of hybrid work into 2024 suggests that the Donut Effect will persist while also leaving broader metropolitan areas intact.

  View details for DOI 10.1073/pnas.2408930121

  View details for PubMedID 39471226

• Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature Bloom, N., Han, R., Liang, J. 2024

  Abstract

  Working from home has become standard for employees with a university degree. The most common scheme, which has been adopted by around 100 million employees in Europe and North America, is a hybrid schedule, in which individuals spend a mix of days at home and at work each week1,2. However, the effects of hybrid working on employees and firms have been debated, and some executives argue that it damages productivity, innovation and career development3-5. Here we ran a six-month randomized control trial investigating the effects of hybrid working from home on 1,612 employees in a Chinese technology company in 2021-2022. We found that hybrid working improved job satisfaction and reduced quit rates by one-third. The reduction in quit rates was significant for non-managers, female employees and those with long commutes. Null equivalence tests showed that hybrid working did not affect performance grades over the next two years of reviews. We found no evidence for a difference in promotions over the next two years overall, or for any major employee subgroup. Finally, null equivalence tests showed that hybrid working had no effect on the lines of code written by computer-engineer employees. We also found that the 395 managers in the experiment revised their surveyed views about the effect of hybrid working on productivity, from a perceived negative effect (-2.6% on average) before the experiment to a perceived positive one (+1.0%) after the experiment. These results indicate that a hybrid schedule with two days a week working from home does not damage performance.

  View details for DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2

  View details for PubMedID 38867040

  View details for PubMedCentralID 6126746

• 2020 Klein Lecture-Investment and Subjective Uncertainty INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Foster, L., Ohlmacher, S., Saporta-Eksten, I. 2024

  View details for DOI 10.1111/iere.12709

  View details for Web of Science ID 001227942500001

• The Finance Uncertainty Multiplier JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY Alfaro, I., Bloom, N., Lin, X. 2024

  View details for DOI 10.1086/726230

  View details for Web of Science ID 001152774900001

• Long Social Distancing JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS Barrero, J., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J. 2023; 41: S129-S172

  View details for DOI 10.1086/726636

  View details for Web of Science ID 001081998300005

• Using Disasters to Estimate the Impact of Uncertainty REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Terry, S. J. 2023

  View details for DOI 10.1093/restud/rdad036

  View details for Web of Science ID 000972441200001

• The Evolution of Work from Home JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES Barrero, J., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J. 2023; 37 (4): 23-50

  View details for DOI 10.1257/jep.37.4.23

  View details for Web of Science ID 001111026100010

• Surveying business uncertainty JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS Altig, D., Barrero, J., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Meyer, B., Parker, N. 2022; 231 (1): 282-303

  View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.03.021

  View details for Web of Science ID 000864602300015

• Income dynamics in the United Kingdom and the impact of the Covid-19 recession. Quantitative economics Bell, B., Bloom, N., Blundell, J. 2022; 13 (4): 1849-1878

  Abstract

  In this paper, we use an employer-based survey of earnings and hours to set out the key patterns in UK earnings dynamics from 1975 to 2020, with a particular focus on the most recent recession. We demonstrate that (log) earnings changes exhibit strongly procyclical skewness and have become increasingly leptokurtic, and thus less well approximated by a log-normal distribution, over the period of study. This holds across genders and sectors. Exploiting the long duration of our panel, we then explore the responsiveness of earnings and hours to aggregate and firm-level shocks, finding ample heterogeneity in the exposure of different types of workers to aggregate shocks. Exposure is falling in age, firm size, skill level, and permanent earnings, and is lower for unionized and public sector workers. The qualitative patterns of earnings changes across workers observed in the Covid-19 recession of 2020 are broadly as predicted using the previously estimated exposures and size of the shock. Firm-specific shocks are important for wages given the variation in within-firm productivity and the patterns of heterogeneity are markedly different than for aggregate shocks.

  View details for DOI 10.3982/QE1872

  View details for PubMedID 36718257

• Pandemic-Era Uncertainty JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Meyer, B., Mihaylov, E., Maria Barrero, J., Davis, S. J., Altig, D., Bloom, N. 2022; 15 (8)

  View details for DOI 10.3390/jrfm15080338

  View details for Web of Science ID 000846627300001

• Trade and Management REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS Bloom, N., Manova, K., Van Reenen, J., Sun, S., Yu, Z. 2021; 103 (3): 443-460

  View details for DOI 10.1162/rest_a_00925

  View details for Web of Science ID 000673449300003

• The World Management Survey at 18: lessons and the way forward OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY Scur, D., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J., Lemos, R., Bloom, N. 2021; 37 (2): 231-258

  View details for DOI 10.1093/oxrep/grab009

  View details for Web of Science ID 000685212500002

• COVID-19 Is a Persistent Reallocation Shock Barrero, J., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Meyer, B. H. AMER ECONOMIC ASSOC. 2021: 287-291

  View details for DOI 10.1257/pandp.20211110

  View details for Web of Science ID 000655908100054

• COVID-19 Shifted Patent Applications toward Technologies That Support Working from Home Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Zhestkova, Y. AMER ECONOMIC ASSOC. 2021: 263-266

  View details for DOI 10.1257/pandp.20211057

  View details for Web of Science ID 000655908100049

• Turbulence. Firm Decentralization. and Growth in Bad Times AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Lucking, B., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2021; 13 (1): 133–69

  View details for DOI 10.1257/app.20180752

  View details for Web of Science ID 000604439700005

• TRAPPED FACTORS AND CHINA'S IMPACT ON GLOBAL GROWTH ECONOMIC JOURNAL Bloom, N., Romer, P., Terry, S. J., Van Reenen, J. 2021; 131 (633): 156–91

  View details for DOI 10.1093/ej/ueaa086

  View details for Web of Science ID 000637047500006

• The Unprecedented Stock Market Reaction to COVID-19 REVIEW OF ASSET PRICING STUDIES Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Kost, K., Sammon, M., Viratyosin, T. 2020; 10 (4): 742–58

  View details for DOI 10.1093/rapstu/raaa008

  View details for Web of Science ID 000595485100008

• Firm performance and macro forecast accuracy JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS Tanaka, M., Bloom, N., David, J. M., Koga, M. 2020; 114: 26–41

  View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.02.008

  View details for Web of Science ID 000571474100002

• Economic Uncertainty Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of public economics Altig, D., Baker, S., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Chen, S., Davis, S. J., Leather, J., Meyer, B., Mihaylov, E., Mizen, P., Parker, N., Renault, T., Smietanka, P., Thwaites, G. 2020: 104274

  Abstract

  We consider several economic uncertainty indicators for the US and UK before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: implied stock market volatility, newspaper-based policy uncertainty, twitter chatter about economic uncertainty, subjective uncertainty about business growth, forecaster disagreement about future GDP growth, and a model-based measure of macro uncertainty. Four results emerge. First, all indicators show huge uncertainty jumps in reaction to the pandemic and its economic fallout. Indeed, most indicators reach their highest values on record. Second, peak amplitudes differ greatly - from a 35% rise for the model-based measure of US economic uncertainty (relative to January 2020) to a 20-fold rise in forecaster disagreement about UK growth. Third, time paths also differ: Implied volatility rose rapidly from late February, peaked in mid-March, and fell back by late March as stock prices began to recover. In contrast, broader measures of uncertainty peaked later and then plateaued, as job losses mounted, highlighting differences between Wall Street and Main Street uncertainty measures. Fourth, in Cholesky-identified VAR models fit to monthly U.S. data, a COVID-size uncertainty shock foreshadows peak drops in industrial production of 12-19%.

  View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104274

  View details for PubMedID 32921841

• Healthy Business? Managerial Education and Management in Health Care REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2020; 102 (3): 506–17

  View details for DOI 10.1162/rest_a_00847

  View details for Web of Science ID 000544959700007

• COVID-19 Is Also a Reallocation Shock BROOKINGS PAPERS ON ECONOMIC ACTIVITY Barrero, J., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J. 2020: 329–71

  View details for DOI 10.1353/eca.2020.0012

  View details for Web of Science ID 000639606200012

• Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW Bloom, N., Jones, C., Van Reenen, J., Webb, M. 2020; 110 (4): 1104–44

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.20180338

  View details for Web of Science ID 000522720800005

• Do Management Interventions Last? Evidence from India AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS Bloom, N., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., Roberts, J. 2020; 12 (2): 198–219

  View details for DOI 10.1257/app.20180369

  View details for Web of Science ID 000522150600007

• Have R&D Spillovers Declined in the 21(st) Century? FISCAL STUDIES Lucking, B., Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J. 2019; 40 (4): 561–90

  View details for DOI 10.1111/1475-5890.12195

  View details for Web of Science ID 000513759700006

• A toolkit of policies to promote innovation VOPROSY EKONOMIKI Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., Williams, H. 2019: 5–31

  View details for DOI 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-10-5-31

  View details for Web of Science ID 000497653800001

• A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., Williams, H. 2019; 33 (3): 163–84

  View details for DOI 10.1257/jep.33.3.163

  View details for Web of Science ID 000478070800008

• What Drives Differences in Management Practices? AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW Bloom, N., Brynjolfsson, E., Foster, L., Jarmin, R., Patnaik, M., Saporta-Eksten, I., Van Reenen, J. 2019; 109 (5): 1648–83

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.20170491

  View details for Web of Science ID 000466609600003

• THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Song, J., Price, D. J., Guvenen, F., Bloom, N., Von Wachter, T. 2019; 134 (1): 1–50

  View details for DOI 10.1093/qje/qjy025

  View details for Web of Science ID 000489161300001

• Brexit and Uncertainty: Insights from the Decision Maker Panel FISCAL STUDIES Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Chen, S., Mizen, P., Smietanka, P., Thwaites, G., Young, G. 2018; 39 (4): 555–80

  View details for DOI 10.1111/1475-5890.12179

  View details for Web of Science ID 000453773000002

• Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Alp, H., Bloom, N., Kerr, W. 2018; 108 (11): 3450–91

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.20130470

  View details for Web of Science ID 000448528900011

• Really Uncertain Business Cycles ECONOMETRICA Bloom, N., Floetotto, M., Jaimovich, N., Saporta-Eksten, I., Terry, S. J. 2018; 86 (3): 1031–65

  View details for DOI 10.3982/ECTA10927

  View details for Web of Science ID 000434093400007

• The Disappearing Large-Firm Wage Premium Bloom, N., Guvenen, F., Smith, B. S., Song, J., von Wachterk, T. AMER ECONOMIC ASSOC. 2018: 317–22

  View details for DOI 10.1257/pandp.20181066

  View details for Web of Science ID 000434468600061

• Management Practices, Workforce Selection, and Productivity JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS Bender, S., Bloom, N., Card, D., Van Reenen, J., Wolter, S. 2018; 36: S371–S409

  View details for DOI 10.1086/694107

  View details for Web of Science ID 000418563400009

• Observations on Uncertainty AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW Bloom, N. 2017; 50 (1): 79-84

  View details for DOI 10.1111/1467-8462.12203

  View details for Web of Science ID 000398118200007

• Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J. 2016; 131 (4): 1593-1636

  View details for DOI 10.1093/qje/qjw024

  View details for Web of Science ID 000388576700001

• International Data on Measuring Management Practices AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., Scur, D., Van Reenen, J. 2016; 106 (5): 152-156

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.p20161058

  View details for Web of Science ID 000379341300028

• Trade Induced Technical Change? The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and Productivity REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES Bloom, N., Draca, M., Van Reenen, J. 2016; 83 (1): 87-117

  View details for DOI 10.1093/restud/rdv039

  View details for Web of Science ID 000374224300004

• Hospital Board And Management Practices Are Strongly Related To Hospital Performance On Clinical Quality Metrics HEALTH AFFAIRS Tsai, T. C., Jha, A. K., Gawande, A. A., Huckman, R. S., Bloom, N., Sadun, R. 2015; 34 (8): 1304-1311

  Abstract

  National policies to improve health care quality have largely focused on clinical provider outcomes and, more recently, payment reform. Yet the association between hospital leadership and quality, although crucial to driving quality improvement, has not been explored in depth. We collected data from surveys of nationally representative groups of hospitals in the United States and England to examine the relationships among hospital boards, management practices of front-line managers, and the quality of care delivered. First, we found that hospitals with more effective management practices provided higher-quality care. Second, higher-rated hospital boards had superior performance by hospital management staff. Finally, we identified two signatures of high-performing hospital boards and management practice. Hospitals with boards that paid greater attention to clinical quality had management that better monitored quality performance. Similarly, we found that hospitals with boards that used clinical quality metrics more effectively had higher performance by hospital management staff on target setting and operations. These findings help increase understanding of the dynamics among boards, front-line management, and quality of care and could provide new targets for improving care delivery.

  View details for DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1282

  View details for Web of Science ID 000361141000009

  View details for PubMedID 26240243

• Does Management Matter in schools? ECONOMIC JOURNAL Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2015; 125 (584): 647-674

  View details for DOI 10.1111/ecoj.12267

  View details for Web of Science ID 000355237500002

• Do Private Equity Owned Firms Have Better Management Practices? AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW Bloom, N., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2015; 105 (5): 442-446

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.p20151000

  View details for Web of Science ID 000357929400082

• The Impact of Competition on Management Quality: Evidence from Public Hospitals REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES Bloom, N., Propper, C., Seiler, S., Van Reenen, J. 2015; 82 (2): 457-489

  View details for DOI 10.1093/restud/rdu045

  View details for Web of Science ID 000353544900002

• Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., Ying, Z. J. 2015; 130 (1): 165-218

  View details for DOI 10.1093/qje/qju032

  View details for Web of Science ID 000351525000004

• The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Bloom, N., Garicano, L., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2014; 60 (12)

  View details for DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2013

  View details for Web of Science ID 000346204900001

• JEEA-FBBVA LECTURE 2013: THE NEW EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., Scur, D., Van Reenen, J. 2014; 12 (4): 835-876

  View details for DOI 10.1111/jeea.12094

  View details for Web of Science ID 000340677900001

• Why Has US Policy Uncertainty Risen Since 1960? AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Canes-Wrone, B., Davis, S. J., Rodden, J. 2014; 104 (5): 56-60

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.104.5.56

  View details for Web of Science ID 000338925400008

• Incomplete Contracts and the Internal Organization of Firms JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J. 2014; 30: 37-63

  View details for DOI 10.1093/jleo/ewt003

  View details for Web of Science ID 000336411900003

• Fluctuations in Uncertainty JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES Bloom, N. 2014; 28 (2): 153-175

  View details for DOI 10.1257/jep.28.2.153

  View details for Web of Science ID 000344365500008

• Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry ECONOMETRICA Bloom, N., Schankerman, M., Van Reenen, J. 2013; 81 (4): 1347-1393

  View details for DOI 10.3982/ECTA9466

  View details for Web of Science ID 000322338400005

• A Trapped-Factors Model of Innovation AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW Bloom, N., Romer, P. M., Terry, S. J., Van Reenen, J. 2013; 103 (3): 208-213

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.103.3.208

  View details for Web of Science ID 000322877000034

• Management Practices and the Quality of Care in Cardiac Units JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE McConnell, K. J., Lindrooth, R. C., Wholey, D. R., Maddox, T. M., Bloom, N. 2013; 173 (8): 684-692

  Abstract

  To improve the quality of health care, many researchers have suggested that health care institutions adopt management approaches that have been successful in the manufacturing and technology sectors. However, relatively little information exists about how these practices are disseminated in hospitals and whether they are associated with better performance.To describe the variation in management practices among a large sample of hospital cardiac care units; assess association of these practices with processes of care, readmissions, and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); and suggest specific directions for the testing and dissemination of health care management approaches.We adapted an approach used to measure management and organizational practices in manufacturing to collect management data on cardiac units. We scored performance in 18 practices using the following 4 dimensions: standardizing care, tracking of key performance indicators, setting targets, and incentivizing employees. We used multivariate analyses to assess the relationship of management practices with process-of-care measures, 30-day risk-adjusted mortality, and 30-day readmissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Cardiac units in US hospitals.Five hundred ninety-seven cardiac units, representing 51.5% of hospitals with interventional cardiac catheterization laboratories and at least 25 annual AMI discharges.Process-of-care measures, 30-day risk-adjusted mortality, and 30-day readmissions for AMI.We found a wide distribution in management practices, with fewer than 20% of hospitals scoring a 4 or a 5 (best practice) on more than 9 measures. In multivariate analyses, management practices were significantly correlated with mortality (P = .01) and 6 of 6 process measures (P < .05). No statistically significant association was found between management and 30-day readmissions.The use of management practices adopted from manufacturing sectors is associated with higher process-of-care measures and lower 30-day AMI mortality. Given the wide differences in management practices across hospitals, dissemination of these practices may be beneficial in achieving high-quality outcomes.

  View details for DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3577

  View details for PubMedID 23552986

• DOES MANAGEMENT MATTER? EVIDENCE FROM INDIA QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Bloom, N., Eifert, B., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., Roberts, J. 2013; 128 (1): 1-51

  View details for DOI 10.1093/qje/qjs044

  View details for Web of Science ID 000314883900001

• Does Management Really Work? HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW Bloom, N., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2012; 90 (11): 76-?

  View details for Web of Science ID 000310097200012

• Does management really work? Harvard business review Bloom, N., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2012; 90 (11): 77-80, 82, 148

  Abstract

  HBR's 90th anniversary is a sensible time to revisit a basic question: Are organizations more likely to succeed if they adopt good management practices? The answer may seem obvious to most HBR readers, but these three economists cast their net much wider than that. In a decadelong study of thousands of organizations in 20 countries, they and their interview teams assessed how well manufacturers, schools, and hospitals adhere to three management basics: targets, incentives, and monitoring. They found that huge numbers of companies follow none of those fundamentals, that adopting the basics yields big improvements in outcomes such as productivity and longevity, and that good nuts-and-bolts management at individual firms shapes national performance. At 14 textile manufacturers in India, for example, an intervention--involving free, high-quality advice from a consultant who was on-site half-time for five months--cut defects by half, reduced inventory by 20%, and raised output by 10%. A control group saw no such gains. The authors' global data set suggests that implementing good management at schools and hospitals yields change more slowly than at manufacturers--but it does come eventually. And the macroeconomic potential--for incomes, productivity, and delivery of critically needed services--is huge. A call for "better management" may sound prosaic, but given the global payoffs, it's actually quite radical.

  View details for PubMedID 23155999

• The Organization of Firms Across Countries QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Bloom, N., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2012; 127 (4): 1663-1705

  View details for DOI 10.1093/qje/qje029

  View details for Web of Science ID 000311905500003

• The land that lean manufacturing forgot? Management practices in transition countries ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION Bloom, N., Schweiger, H., Van Reenen, J. 2012; 20 (4): 593-635

  View details for DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0351.2012.00444.x

  View details for Web of Science ID 000308940500002

• Uncertainty and the Economy POLICY REVIEW Bloom, N., Davis, S. J. 2012: 3-13

  View details for Web of Science ID 000309851200001

• Management Practices Across Firms and Countries ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES Bloom, N., Genakos, C., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2012; 26 (1): 12-33

  View details for DOI 10.5465/amp.2011.0077

  View details for Web of Science ID 000302008200002

• Americans Do IT Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW Bloom, N., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2012; 102 (1): 167-201

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.102.1.167

  View details for Web of Science ID 000300411000006

• ARE FAMILY-FRIENDLY WORKPLACE PRACTICES A VALUABLE FIRM RESOURCE? STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL Bloom, N., Kretschmer, T., Van Reenen, J. 2011; 32 (4): 343-367

  View details for DOI 10.1002/smj.879

  View details for Web of Science ID 000287765200001

• Human resource management and productivity Handbook of Labor Economics Bloom, N., Reenen, J. V. 2011
• New Approaches to Surveying Organizations 122nd Annual Meeting of the American-Economics-Association Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J. AMER ECONOMIC ASSOC. 2010: 105–9

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.100.2.105

  View details for Web of Science ID 000278389300022

• Why Do Firms in Developing Countries Have Low Productivity? 122nd Annual Meeting of the American-Economics-Association Bloom, N., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., Roberts, J. AMER ECONOMIC ASSOC. 2010: 619–23

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.100.2.619

  View details for Web of Science ID 000278389300119

• Does Product Market Competition Lead Firms to Decentralize? 122nd Annual Meeting of the American-Economics-Association Bloom, N., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. AMER ECONOMIC ASSOC. 2010: 434–38

  View details for DOI 10.1257/aer.100.2.434

  View details for Web of Science ID 000278389300084

• Modern Management: Good for the Environment or Just Hot Air? ECONOMIC JOURNAL Bloom, N., Genakos, C., Martin, R., Sadun, R. 2010; 120 (544): 551-572

  View details for DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02351.x

  View details for Web of Science ID 000277405100012

• Recent Advances in the Empirics of Organizational Economics ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 2 Bloom, N., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J. 2010; 2: 105-137

  View details for DOI 10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.143328

  View details for Web of Science ID 000290636900005

• Why Do Management Practices Differ across Firms and Countries? JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J. 2010; 24 (1): 203-224

  View details for DOI 10.1257/jep.24.1.203

  View details for Web of Science ID 000275435100010

• The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks ECONOMETRICA Bloom, N. 2009; 77 (3): 623-685

  View details for DOI 10.3982/ECTA6248

  View details for Web of Science ID 000266267700001

• Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J. 2007; 122 (4): 1351-1408

  View details for Web of Science ID 000251506900001

• Uncertainty and the dynamics of R&D 119th Annual Meeting of the American-Economic-Association Bloom, N. AMER ECONOMIC ASSOC. 2007: 250–55

  View details for Web of Science ID 000246986500041

• Uncertainty and investment dynamics REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES Bloom, N., Bond, S., Van Reenen, J. 2007; 74 (2): 391-415

  View details for Web of Science ID 000245158400002

• Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P. 2005; 120 (2): 701-728

  View details for Web of Science ID 000229439000008

• Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997 JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS Bloom, N., Griffith, R., Van Reenen, J. 2002; 85 (1): 1-31

  View details for Web of Science ID 000176456100001

• Patents, real options and firm performance ECONOMIC JOURNAL Bloom, N., van Reenen, J. 2002; 112 (478): C97-C116

  View details for Web of Science ID 000174916900008