Tiffany Meng Yue

All Publications

• Combined Breast and Lung Cancer Screening Among Dual-Eligible Women: A Descriptive Study. The Journal of surgical research Yue, T., Wong, L. Y., Jani, C., Agarwal, L., Al Omari, O., Aghagoli, G., Ahmed, A., Bhatt, P., Lee, A., Lotz, M., Marmor, H., Paliotti, G., Pories, S., Richmond, J., Shula, L., Sandler, K. L., Conley Thomson, C., Backhus, L. M. 2024

  Abstract

  Lung cancer is consistently the leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States, yet lung cancer screening (LCS) rates remain low. By contrast, screening mammography rates are reliably high, suggesting that screening mammography can be a "teachable moment" to increase LCS uptake among dual-eligible women.This is a prospective survey study conducted at two academic institutions. Patients undergoing screening mammography were evaluated for LCS eligibility and offered enrollment in a pilot dual-cancer screening program. A series of surveys was administered to characterize participants' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes about LCS before and after undergoing dual screening. Data were descriptively summarized.Between August 2022 and July 2023, 54 LCS-eligible patients were enrolled. The study cohort was 100% female and predominantly White (81%), with a median age of 57 y and median of 36 pack-y of smoking. Survey results showed that 98% felt they were at risk for lung cancer, with most (80%) motivated by early detection of potential cancer. Regarding screening barriers, 58% of patients lacked knowledge about LCS eligibility and 47% reported concerns about screening cost. Prior to undergoing LCS, 87% of patients expressed interest in combined breast and lung screening. Encouragingly, after LCS, 84% were likely or very likely to undergo dual screening again and 93% found the shared decision-making visit helpful or very helpful.Pairing breast and LCS is a feasible, acceptable intervention that, along with increasing patient and provider education about LCS, can increase LCS uptake and reduce lung cancer mortality.

  View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.024

  View details for PubMedID 38862305

• Harnessing Opportunity: Pilot Intervention to Improve Lung Cancer Screening for Women Undergoing Breast Screening Mammography. JTO clinical and research reports Wong, L., Yue, T., Aghagoli, G., Baiu, I., Shula, L., Lee, A., Lui, N. S., Backhus, L. M. 2024; 5 (6): 100671

  Abstract

  Introduction: The screening mammogram could be a "teachable moment" to improve lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake. The aim of our project was to combine patient self-referral with eligibility identification by providers as a two-pronged approach to increase rates of LCS among eligible women.Methods: LCS education materials were created to stimulate patient education and encourage self-referral. Chart review of patients scheduled for screening mammography was performed to identify patients who met LCS criteria. The primary outcome was rate of acceptance of targeted interventions as measured by qualitative survey material and rate of LCS uptake.Results: Between August 2022 and August 2023, 116 patients were identified by providers for potential eligibility for LCS and 34 patients (29.3%) deemed eligible based on the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force 2021 guidelines. There were 19 patients (56%) who completed LCS with three patients (16%) with screen-detected nodules that led to further workup. Post-implementation qualitative survey results reveal that 100% of the participants rated their shared decision-making visit experience as "very helpful" and 67% responded "very likely" to seek simultaneous breast and LCS in the future. Informational materials were rated as 80% favorable among all respondents; however, the rate of self-referral alone was 0%. The combined rates of eligible patients lost to follow-up or refusal was 24%.Conclusion: The self-referral aspect of the intervention revealed that patients are unlikely to self-refer for LCS. Nevertheless, patients undergoing screening mammograms individually identified for LCS were very responsive to learning more about dual screening.

  View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100671

  View details for PubMedID 38799132

• Pediatric Trauma Center Access, Regional Injury Burden, and Socioeconomic Disadvantage. JAMA surgery Hur, D. G., Ren, A. L., Yue, T. M., Spain, D. A., Choi, J. 2024

  View details for DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0962

  View details for PubMedID 38748438

• Factors Predicting Readmission and Mortality in Patients Admitted for Malignant Bowel Obstruction. The American surgeon Xu, N., Sun, B. J., Yue, T. M., Lee, B. 2024: 31348241250045

  Abstract

  Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common complication of patients with advanced malignancies and has poor prognosis. Currently, there are limited guidelines for MBO management or predicting outcomes for these patients.To identify patient factors associated with readmission and mortality after hospital admission for MBO.A 5-year retrospective review was performed from 2017 to 2022 at a single tertiary institution to evaluate patients admitted for MBO. All patients had advanced cancer of gastrointestinal or gynecologic primary. Patient demographics, socioeconomic factors, tumor characteristics, and inpatient outcomes were collected. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine variables predicting hospital readmission for recurrent MBO and 90-day mortality.210 patients were included. Mean age was 61 years, 28% were male, and 19% did not primarily speak English. 35% of patients lived over 50 miles from the hospital. On multivariable analysis, non-English speaking patients exhibited increased risk of readmission for MBO (OR = 2.82, P = .039). Older age was associated with decreased risk for MBO readmission (OR = .96, P = .007). Ascites was associated with increased mortality (OR = 2.17, P = .043). Earlier palliative care (PC) consultation predicted decreased readmission (OR = .24, P < .001) yet increased mortality at 90 days (OR = 3.20, P = .003).Patient age, primary language, and PC consult were predictors for MBO readmission, which may impact 90-day mortality. Given the palliative nature of MBO, modifiable factors such as PC consultation and multidisciplinary goals of care discussions should be prioritized in order to reduce readmissions and focus on quality of life (QOL) for this patient population.

  View details for DOI 10.1177/00031348241250045

  View details for PubMedID 38676624

• Surgical Palliation for Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Preventing Hospital Readmission: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center. Annals of surgical oncology Sun, B. J., Yue, T. M., Xu, N., Ayala, C. I., Lee, B. 2024

  View details for DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15318-5

  View details for PubMedID 38668918

• ASO Visual Abstract: Improved Postoperative Pain Management Outcomes After Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Annals of surgical oncology Yue, T. M., Sun, B. J., Xu, N., Ohkuma, R., Fowler, C., Lee, B. 2024

  View details for DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15208-w

  View details for PubMedID 38553655

• ASO Author Reflections: Integrating Multimodal Pain Management Protocols into ERAS for Patients Undergoing CRS-HIPEC. Annals of surgical oncology Yue, T., Sun, B., Lee, B. 2024

  View details for DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15178-z

  View details for PubMedID 38483646

• Improved Postoperative Pain Management Outcomes After Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Annals of surgical oncology Yue, T. M., Sun, B. J., Xu, N., Ohkuma, R., Fowler, C., Lee, B. 2024

  Abstract

  Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis is promising but has potential for significant morbidity and prolonged hospitalization. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a standardized protocol designed to optimize perioperative care. This study describes trends in epidural and opioid use after implementing ERAS for CRS-HIPEC at a tertiary academic center.A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC from January 2020 to September 2023 was conducted. ERAS was implemented in February 2022. Medication and outcomes data were compared before and after ERAS initiation. All opioids were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs).A total of 136 patients underwent CRS-HIPEC: 73 (54%) pre- and 63 (46%) post-ERAS. Epidural usage increased from 63% pre-ERAS to 87% post-ERAS (p = 0.001). Compared with those without epidurals, patients with epidurals had decreased total 7-day oral and intravenous (IV) opioid requirements (45 MME vs. 316 MME; p < 0.001). There was no difference in 7-day opioid totals between pre- and post-ERAS groups. After ERAS, more patients achieved early ambulation (83% vs. 53%; p < 0.001), early diet initiation (81% vs. 25%; p < 0.001), and early return of bowel function (86% vs. 67%; p = 0.012).ERAS implementation for CRS-HIPEC was associated with increased epidural use, decreased oral and IV opioid use, and earlier bowel function return. Our study demonstrates that epidural analgesia provides adequate pain control while significantly decreasing oral and IV opioid use, which may promote gastrointestinal recovery postoperatively. These findings support the implementation of an ERAS protocol for effective pain management in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

  View details for DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15120-3

  View details for PubMedID 38466484

  View details for PubMedCentralID 3087875

• Initial Multivisceral Resection for Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma Does Not Predict Improved Outcomes After Recurrence Sun, B. J., Yue, T. M., Nobuhara, C. K., Castro, S., Agolia, J. P., Lee, B. SPRINGER. 2024: S42

  View details for Web of Science ID 001185577500086

• Access to Burn Care in the US. JAMA surgery Hur, D. G., Yao, J., Yue, T. M., Sheckter, C. C., Choi, J. 2024

  Abstract

  This cross-sectional study examines burn incidence rates and accessibility of American Burn Association-verified or self-designated burn centers from 2013 to 2019.

  View details for DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7763

  View details for PubMedID 38353985

• Timing of Palliative Care Consultation in Malignant Bowel Obstruction Management Decreases Hospital Readmission Sun, B., Yue, T., Xu, N., Einkauf, K. B., Lee, B. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. 2023: S213-S214

  View details for Web of Science ID 001094086300454

• Timing of Palliative Care Consultation in Malignant Bowel Obstruction Management Decreases Hospital Readmission Sun, B., Yue, T., Xu, N., Einkauf, K. B., Lee, B. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. 2023: S213-S214

  View details for Web of Science ID 001100379000026

• ASO Visual Abstract: Impact of Successful Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Annals of surgical oncology Sun, B. J., Yue, T. M., Xu, N., Fowler, C., Lee, B. 2023

  View details for DOI 10.1245/s10434-023-14334-1

  View details for PubMedID 37741926

• Impact of Successful Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Annals of surgical oncology Sun, B. J., Yue, T. M., Xu, N., Fowler, C., Lee, B. 2023

  Abstract

  Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) are complex operations for the treatment of peritoneal metastases. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are intended to standardize preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pathways, with the goal of improving patient care. This study describes feasibility and outcomes after implementing an ERAS protocol for CRS/HIPEC at a tertiary academic center.A single-institution experience of CRS/HIPEC was reviewed from January 2020 to March 2023. Patients were categorized according to whether they underwent CRS/HIPEC before or after ERAS initiation. Outcomes and protocol adherence were evaluated.A total of 115 CRS/HIPEC operations were included-74 before and 41 after ERAS implementation. Median age was younger in the post-ERAS group, whereas sex, comorbidities, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, operation performed, and operative time were similar between groups. The most common primary cancer sites were gynecologic (40%), appendiceal (24%), and colorectal (22%). Adherence to all postoperative ERAS components was 76%. More post-ERAS patients ambulated by postoperative day (POD) 1 (90% vs. 54%; p < 0.001), tolerated liquid diet by POD 2 (88% vs. 32%; p < 0.001), and had foley removed by POD 3 (86% vs. 43%; p < 0.001). There was a trend toward decreased length of stay in the post-ERAS cohort (7 vs. 8 days; p = 0.092), with no difference in major complications, intensive care unit admission, or 30-day readmission.Despite the heterogeneity of CRS/HIPEC operations, implementing an ERAS protocol for our patients was feasible and resulted in postoperative outcomes and adherence comparable with that of other major abdominal surgeries. This supports the potential for success in ERAS programs for CRS/HIPEC patients.

  View details for DOI 10.1245/s10434-023-14222-8

  View details for PubMedID 37684372

  View details for PubMedCentralID 10088912

• Efficacy of Surgical Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction on Preventing Hospital Readmission - Experience of a Tertiary Care Center Sun, B. J., Ayala, C. I., Einkauf, K. B., Xu, N., Yue, T. M., Lee, B. SPRINGER. 2023: S110

  View details for Web of Science ID 001046841200228

• Outcomes of Procedural-Based Palliation for Malignant Bowel Obstruction Sun, B. J., Xu, N., Yue, T. M., Einkauf, K. B., Lee, B. SPRINGER. 2023: S103

  View details for Web of Science ID 001046841200213