Alex Nathaniel Zimmet
Clinical Assistant Professor, Medicine - Infectious Diseases
Bio
Dr. Zimmet is a board-certified Infectious Disease specialist with a focus on caring for immunocompromised patients, including those who have undergone solid organ or bone marrow transplantation. He has a special interest in antimicrobial stewardship and quality improvement in these populations.
Clinical Focus
- Infectious Disease
Honors & Awards
-
Infectious Diseases Fellow's Award for Clinical Excellence, Stanford University School of Medicine (2022)
Professional Education
-
Board Certification: American Board of Internal Medicine, Infectious Disease (2023)
-
Fellowship: Stanford University Infectious Disease Fellowships (2023) CA
-
Residency: University of Virgina School of Medicine (2021) VA
-
Board Certification: American Board of Internal Medicine, Internal Medicine (2020)
-
Medical Education: University of Virgina School of Medicine (2017) VA
-
Fellowship: Stanford University Infectious Disease Fellowships CA
-
Board Certification, American Board of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases (2023)
-
Board Certification, American Board of Internal Medicine, Internal Medicine (2020)
-
Medical Education, University of Virginia School of Medicine (2017)
-
Fellowship, Stanford University School of Medicine (2024)
-
Residency, University of Virginia School of Medicine (2021)
-
BA, Johns Hopkins University (2013)
All Publications
-
"Electronic Phenotyping" Antimicrobials to Facilitate Outpatient Stewardship for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Urinary Tract Infection in Renal Transplant.
Open forum infectious diseases
2024; 11 (3): ofae119
Abstract
Asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection in renal transplant are important antimicrobial stewardship targets but are difficult to identify within electronic medical records. We validated an "electronic phenotype" of antibacterials prescribed for these indications. This may be more useful than billing data in assessing antibiotic indication in this outpatient setting.
View details for DOI 10.1093/ofid/ofae119
View details for PubMedID 38533270
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC10964979
-
Pathophysiological responses to bloodstream infection in critically ill transplant recipients compared to non-transplant recipients.
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
2023
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identification of bloodstream infection (BSI) in transplant recipients may be difficult due to immunosuppression. Accordingly, we aimed to compare responses to BSI in critically ill transplant and non-transplant recipients and to modify systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for transplant recipients.METHODS: We analyzed univariate risks and developed multivariable models of BSI with 27 clinical variables from adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients at the University of Virginia (UVA) and at the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt). We used Bayesian inference to adjust SIRS criteria for transplant recipients.RESULTS: We analyzed 38.7 million hourly measurements from 41,725 patients at UVA, including 1,897 transplant recipients with 193 episodes of BSI, and 53,608 patients at Pitt, including 1,614 transplant recipients with 768 episodes of BSI. The univariate responses to BSI were comparable in transplant and non-transplant recipients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.83) for the model using all UVA patient data and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83) when using only transplant recipient data. The UVA all-patient model had an AUC of 0.77 (95%CI, 0.76-0.79) in non-transplant recipients and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79) in transplant recipients at Pitt. The relative importance of the 27 predictors was similar in transplant and non-transplant models. An upper temperature of 37.5°C in SIRS criteria improved reclassification performance in transplant recipients.CONCLUSION: Critically ill transplant and non-transplant recipients had similar responses to BSI. An upper temperature of 37.5°C in SIRS criteria improved BSI screening in transplant recipients.
View details for DOI 10.1093/cid/ciad662
View details for PubMedID 37889515
-
Low infectivity among asymptomatic patients with a positive severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) admission test at a tertiary care center, 2020-2022.
Infection control and hospital epidemiology
2023: 1-3
Abstract
We used a strand-specific RT-qPCR to evaluate viral replication as a surrogate for infectiousness among 242 asymptomatic inpatients with a positive severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) admission test. Only 21 patients (9%) had detectable SARS-CoV-2 minus-strand RNA. Because most patients were found to be noninfectious, our findings support the suspension of asymptomatic admission testing.
View details for DOI 10.1017/ice.2023.210
View details for PubMedID 37746805
-
Use of a severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strand-specific assay to evaluate for prolonged viral replication >20 days from illness onset.
Infection control and hospital epidemiology
2023: 1-3
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) strand-specific assay can be used to identify active SARS-CoV-2 viral replication. We describe the characteristics of 337 hospitalized patients with at least 1 minus-strand SARS-CoV-2 assay performed >20 days after illness onset. This test is a novel tool to identify high-risk hospitalized patients with prolonged SARS-CoV-2 replication.
View details for DOI 10.1017/ice.2023.105
View details for PubMedID 37381726
-
Answer to June 2023 Photo Quiz.
Journal of clinical microbiology
2023; 61 (6): e0175422
View details for DOI 10.1128/jcm.01754-22
View details for PubMedID 37338230
-
Photo Quiz: A 50-Year Old Man with Fever and Headache.
Journal of clinical microbiology
2023; 61 (6): e0172522
View details for DOI 10.1128/jcm.01725-22
View details for PubMedID 37338227
-
Disseminated cryptococcosis with gastrointestinal involvement and false-negative cryptococcal antigen testing due to postzone phenomenon: a case report and review of the literature.
BMC infectious diseases
2023; 23 (1): 217
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cryptococcosis is an increasingly common infection given the growing immunocompromised population worldwide. Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing demonstrates excellent sensitivity and specificity and is the mainstay of diagnosis. However, there may be rare instances in which false-negative CrAg results can delay diagnosis and early treatment, which are critical to ensure positive outcomes.CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old man living with HIV/AIDS who was not taking antiretroviral therapy was hospitalized with fever, diarrhea, and headaches. CD4 count on presentation was 71 cells/uL, and HIV viral load was 3,194,949 copies/mL. Serum CrAg testing was initially negative, however CSF CrAg performed several days later was positive at 1:40 and blood and CSF cultures grew Cryptococcus neoformans. Colonoscopy revealed mucosal papules throughout the sigmoid colon, and tissue biopsy showed yeast within the lamina propria consistent with GI cryptococcosis. Given the high burden of disease, the original serum CrAg specimen was serially diluted and subsequently found to be positive at 1:2,560, confirming the postzone phenomenon.CONCLUSION: Cryptococcosis has a wide array of presentations including intraluminal GI disease, as seen in this patient. While serum CrAg testing displays excellent test characteristics, it is important for clinicians to be aware of the rare instances in which false-negative results may occur in the presence of excess antigen, as in this case.
View details for DOI 10.1186/s12879-023-08141-y
View details for PubMedID 37024821