Bio


My research focuses on the cognitive mechanisms underpinning learning and memory and asks the following questions: 1) What are the neural bases for flexible coding of the brain and how do experiences shape these processes? 2) How do cross-brain-region activities influence memory encoding and recall? 3) Develop new techniques/methods to reintroduce the normal activity in the malfunctioned brains.
Durin my postdoc, I will work on spatial and social memory integration in the hippocampus to understand the mechanism of flexible coding in healthy and diseased brains.

Honors & Awards


  • Barres Research Endowment to Support Postdoctoral Fellowships, interdepartmental., Stanford University, department of Neurobiology (2023-present)
  • Stanford School of Medicine Dean’s Postdoctoral Fellowship, Stanford University (2023-2024)
  • Best Dissertation Award in Neurobiology, University of Chicago (2022)
  • Biological Science Division 2nd year international student fellowship, University of Chicago (2017-2018)
  • First-Class Scholarship for Elite students in Basic Sciences of ZJU, selected once per year., Zhejiang University (2013-2015)

Boards, Advisory Committees, Professional Organizations


  • Editor of the Media Committee, Graduate women in Science (2024 - Present)
  • Member, Women in science and engineer (WISE) at Stanford University (2022 - Present)

Professional Education


  • Doctor of Philosophy, University of Chicago (2022)
  • PHD, University of Chicago, Neurobiology (2022)
  • BS, Zhejiang University, Biological Sciences (2016)

Stanford Advisors


Research Interests


  • Brain and Learning Sciences

Lab Affiliations


All Publications


  • BTSP, not STDP, Drives Shifts in Hippocampal Representations During Familiarization. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology Madar, A. D., Dong, C., Sheffield, M. E. 2023

    Abstract

    Synaptic plasticity is widely thought to support memory storage in the brain, but the rules determining impactful synaptic changes in-vivo are not known. We considered the trial-by-trial shifting dynamics of hippocampal place fields (PFs) as an indicator of ongoing plasticity during memory formation. By implementing different plasticity rules in computational models of spiking place cells and comparing to experimentally measured PFs from mice navigating familiar and novel environments, we found that Behavioral-Timescale-Synaptic-Plasticity (BTSP), rather than Hebbian Spike-Timing-Dependent-Plasticity, is the principal mechanism governing PF shifting dynamics. BTSP-triggering events are rare, but more frequent during novel experiences. During exploration, their probability is dynamic: it decays after PF onset, but continually drives a population-level representational drift. Finally, our results show that BTSP occurs in CA3 but is less frequent and phenomenologically different than in CA1. Overall, our study provides a new framework to understand how synaptic plasticity shapes neuronal representations during learning.

    View details for DOI 10.1101/2023.10.17.562791

    View details for PubMedID 37904999

    View details for PubMedCentralID PMC10614909

  • Distinct place cell dynamics in CA1 and CA3 encode experience in new environments. Nature communications Dong, C., Madar, A. D., Sheffield, M. E. 2021; 12 (1): 2977

    Abstract

    When exploring new environments animals form spatial memories that are updated with experience and retrieved upon re-exposure to the same environment. The hippocampus is thought to support these memory processes, but how this is achieved by different subnetworks such as CA1 and CA3 remains unclear. To understand how hippocampal spatial representations emerge and evolve during familiarization, we performed 2-photon calcium imaging in mice running in new virtual environments and compared the trial-to-trial dynamics of place cells in CA1 and CA3 over days. We find that place fields in CA1 emerge rapidly but tend to shift backwards from trial-to-trial and remap upon re-exposure to the environment a day later. In contrast, place fields in CA3 emerge gradually but show more stable trial-to-trial and day-to-day dynamics. These results reflect different roles in CA1 and CA3 in spatial memory processing during familiarization to new environments and constrain the potential mechanisms that support them.

    View details for DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-23260-3

    View details for PubMedID 34016996

    View details for PubMedCentralID PMC8137926

  • The Precision of Place Fields Governs Their Fate across Epochs of Experience ENEURO Chiu, Y., Dong, C., Krishnan, S., Sheffield, M. J. 2023; 10 (12)

    Abstract

    Spatial memories are represented by hippocampal place cells during navigation. This spatial code is dynamic, undergoing changes across time, known as representational drift, and across changes in internal state, even while navigating the same spatial environment with consistent behavior. A dynamic code may provide the hippocampus a means to track distinct epochs of experience that occur at different times or during different internal states and update spatial memories. Changes to the spatial code include place fields (PFs) that remap to new locations and place fields that vanish, while others are stable. However, what determines place field fate across epochs remains unclear. We measured the lap-by-lap properties of place cells in mice during navigation for a block of trials in a rewarded virtual environment. We then determined the position of the place fields in another block of trials in the same spatial environment either separated by a day (a distinct temporal epoch) or during the same session but with reward removed to change reward expectation (a distinct internal state epoch). We found that place cells with remapped place fields across epochs tended to have lower spatial precision during navigation in the initial epoch. Place cells with stable or vanished place fields tended to have higher spatial precision. We conclude that place cells with less precise place fields have greater spatial flexibility, allowing them to respond to, and track, distinct epochs of experience in the same spatial environment, while place cells with precise place fields generally preserve spatial information when their fields reappear.

    View details for DOI 10.1523/ENEURO.0261-23.2023

    View details for Web of Science ID 001124427900001

    View details for PubMedID 37973379

    View details for PubMedCentralID PMC10706252