David Freeman Engstrom
Professor of Law
Stanford Law School
Bio
David Freeman Engstrom is the LSVF Professor in Law and Co-Director of the Deborah L. Rhode Center on the Legal Profession at Stanford Law School. He is a scholar of public law, complex organizations, and political economy whose research and teaching explore problems in litigation procedure, administrative law, artificial intelligence and the law, constitutional law, civil rights, and access to courts. He is a faculty affiliate at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, the Regulation, Evaluation, and Governance Lab (RegLab), and CodeX: The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics. Engstrom currently serves as the Reporter for the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law, High-Volume Civil Adjudication. He co-founded the Filing Fairness Project, a multi-state effort to modernize court filing systems and widen access to our courts. He is an elected member of the American Law Institute, a Public Member of the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), and a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation. Prior to joining the Stanford faculty, he was a litigator at a boutique D.C. law firm, where he represented clients before the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts and agencies, and clerked for Judge Diane P. Wood on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Academic Appointments
-
Professor, Stanford Law School
-
Faculty Affiliate, Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI)
Administrative Appointments
-
Co-Director, Deborah L. Rhode Center on the Legal Profession (2021 - Present)
-
Associate Dean, Stanford Law School (2018 - 2021)
Boards, Advisory Committees, Professional Organizations
-
Public Member, Administrative Conference of the United States (2020 - Present)
-
Elected Member, American Law Institute (2017 - Present)
-
Fellow, American Bar Foundation (2016 - Present)
-
Member, California Bar (2017 - Present)
-
Member, Maryland Bar (2003 - Present)
-
Member, District of Columbia Bar (2006 - Present)
Professional Education
-
J.D., Stanford Law School (2002)
-
Ph.D., Yale University (political science) (2005)
-
M.Sc., Oxford University (1996)
-
A.B., Dartmouth College (1993)
2024-25 Courses
- Access to Justice: Law, Policy, and Legal Ethics
LAW 6018 (Aut) - Administrative Law
LAW 7001A (Win) -
Prior Year Courses
2023-24 Courses
- Access to Justice: Law, Policy, and Legal Ethics
LAW 6018 (Spr) - Civil Procedure I
LAW 201 (Aut) - Externship, Special Circumstances
LAW 884 (Spr) - Policy Practicum: Expanding Access to Justice in Eviction and Family Law
LAW 809L (Win, Spr)
2022-23 Courses
- Access to Justice
LAW 6017 (Spr) - Administrative Law
LAW 7001 (Win) - Externship, Special Circumstances
LAW 884 (Spr)
2021-22 Courses
- Administrative Law
LAW 7001 (Win) - Civil Procedure I
LAW 201 (Aut) - Policy Practicum: Can Opening Up the Legal Services Market Increase Access to Justice?
LAW 807H (Win, Spr) - Policy Practicum: Unlocking Technology to Promote Access to Justice
LAW 808J (Aut, Win)
- Access to Justice: Law, Policy, and Legal Ethics
All Publications
-
Legal Tech and the Litigation Playing Field
LEGAL TECH AND THE FUTURE OF CIVIL JUSTICE
2023: 133-154
View details for Web of Science ID 001003618200007
-
Civil Justice at the Crossroads Introduction
LEGAL TECH AND THE FUTURE OF CIVIL JUSTICE
2023: 1-18
View details for Web of Science ID 001003618200001
-
Disparate Limbo: How Administrative Law Erased Antidiscrimination
YALE LAW JOURNAL
2021; 131 (2): 370-474
View details for Web of Science ID 000725611900001
-
Disparate Limbo: How Administrative Law Erased Antidiscrimination
YALE LAW JOURNAL
2021; 131 (2): 370-474
View details for Web of Science ID 000727945500006
-
DIGITAL CIVIL PROCEDURE
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW
2021; 169 (8): 2243-2289
View details for Web of Science ID 000751861000005
-
Rights, Redistribution, and the Rise of the "Litigation State": The Case of Disability Discrimination Laws
LAW AND SOCIAL INQUIRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION
2021; 46 (3): 788-825
View details for Web of Science ID 000688153000007
-
LEGAL TECH, CIVIL PROCEDURE, AND THE FUTURE OF ADVERSARIALISM
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW
2021; 169 (4): 1001-1099
View details for Web of Science ID 000661136300002
-
Algorithmic Accountability in the Administrative State
YALE JOURNAL ON REGULATION
2020; 37 (3): 800–854
View details for Web of Science ID 000567989300001
-
"Not Merely There to Help the Men": Equal Pay Laws, Collective Rights, and the Making of the Modern Class Action
STANFORD LAW REVIEW
2018; 70 (1): 1–97
View details for Web of Science ID 000424312800001
-
Bounty regimes
RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON CORPORATE CRIME AND FINANCIAL MISDEALING
2018: 334–61
View details for Web of Science ID 000449923100015
-
What If California Had a Foreign Policy? The New Frontier of States' Rights
WASHINGTON QUARTERLY
2018; 41 (1): 27–43
View details for DOI 10.1080/0163660X.2018.1445356
View details for Web of Science ID 000428598900002
-
JACOBINS AT JUSTICE: THE (FAILED) CLASS ACTION REVOLUTION OF 1978 AND THE PUZZLE OF AMERICAN PROCEDURAL POLITICAL ECONOMY
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW
2017; 165 (7): 1531–63
View details for Web of Science ID 000415592600002
-
PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT'S PATHWAYS: LESSONS FROM QUI TAM LITIGATION
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW
2014; 114 (8): 1913-2006
View details for Web of Science ID 000346453000001
-
THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT AT FIFTY: PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE
STANFORD LAW REVIEW
2014; 66 (6): 1195-1204
View details for Web of Science ID 000339087500001
-
Agencies as Litigation Gatekeepers
YALE LAW JOURNAL
2013; 123 (3): 616-712
View details for Web of Science ID 000329381300002
-
PUBLIC REGULATION OF PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF DOJ OVERSIGHT OF QUI TAM LITIGATION UNDER THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW
2013; 107 (4): 1689-1755
View details for Web of Science ID 000340886700004
-
THE TWIQBAL PUZZLE AND EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
STANFORD LAW REVIEW
2013; 65 (6): 1203-1248
View details for Web of Science ID 000321534100002
-
CORRALLING CAPTURE
HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY
2013; 36 (1): 31-39
View details for Web of Science ID 000314324600004
-
HARNESSING THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL: EVIDENCE FROM QUI TAM LITIGATION
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW
2012; 112 (6): 1244-1325
View details for Web of Science ID 000310930500002
-
THE LOST ORIGINS OF AMERICAN FAIR EMPLOYMENT LAW: REGULATORY CHOICE AND THE MAKING OF MODERN CIVIL RIGHTS, 1943-1972
STANFORD LAW REVIEW
2011; 63 (5): 1071-1143
View details for Web of Science ID 000291282000002
-
The 1996 welfare law: Key elements and reauthorization issues affecting children
FUTURE OF CHILDREN
2002; 12 (1): 27-57
View details for Web of Science ID 000181114700003