Academic Appointments

Stanford Advisors

Contact

Additional Info

Clinical Trials

  • Project AFECT (Autism Family Empowerment Coaching and Training Program) Recruiting

    The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the journey of families after their child's diagnosis of autism and to help parents understand autism and get the right treatments for their child. This study is for parents of children just diagnosed with autism who are: * Age greater than 1 and up to 5 years old; * Hispanic/Latino OR Black/African-American OR have Medi-Cal as primary health insurance; AND * Live in one of the following counties in California (Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, or Sonoma). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Whether parent coaching through Project AFECT leads to decreased parental stress and increased parental confidence; * Whether family navigation through Project AFECT leads to increased number of referrals to early intervention and educational services and reduced wait times to autism treatments; * Whether children whose parents receive Project AFECT intervention show increased language skills compared to children whose parents did not receive intervention. Participants will be asked to: * Complete surveys at enrollment and 3 and 6 months later. * Work with Project AFECT Coach. Researchers will compare control and intervention groups to see if Project AFECT leads to improved parent and child outcomes.

    View full details

All Publications

  • Family Navigation for Children with Autism: A Scoping Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence. Journal of autism and developmental disorders Lin, I. Y., Morgan, A. C., Stave, C. D., Feldman, H. M., Huffman, L. C. 2025

    Abstract

    Family navigation (FN) has emerged as a promising intervention for reducing barriers and addressing social and economic inequities in autism service delivery. Little is known regarding the implementation and effectiveness of FN for children with autism. The aims of this scoping review are to: (1) summarize the breadth, quantity, and characteristics of the existing literature on FN for children diagnosed with autism; (2) describe the models and outcomes of FN for this population; and (3) identify knowledge gaps and provide directions for future research. Authors used Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping reviews. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Social Services Abstracts, and Web of Science, resulting in identification of 308 papers. Two independent raters completed title/abstract and full-text screenings. Data was extracted using a researcher-developed tool. Results synthesis involved content and construct analysis and descriptive numerical summaries. 17 publications met inclusion criteria. Among these, seven studies evaluated FN models delivered by professional or peer navigators. Three studies investigated FN tools. The remaining seven papers included five qualitative and two mixed methods studies that provided valuable insights on improving FN programs. Overall, studies on FN models reported positive impacts on family activation and well-being, knowledge, and service access and utilization. None addressed improvements in child developmental status or behavioral profiles. FN is a promising intervention for improving family outcomes and increasing service access and utilization. Further research is needed to establish best practices, identify child- and family-centered outcome metrics, and promote scalability and sustainability.

    View details for DOI 10.1007/s10803-025-06798-9

    View details for PubMedID 40100561

    View details for PubMedCentralID 10637767

  • Challenging Case: Family Navigation for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP Lin, I. Y., Stahmer, A. C., Feinberg, E., Feldman, H. M., Deras, M., Augustyn, M. 2024

    Abstract

    Leo is a 28-month-old boy from a monolingual Spanish-speaking family who was referred to a developmental-behavioral pediatrics (DBP) clinic for concerns regarding autism. His parents migrated to the United States 8 years ago and currently live and work on a farm. He was born in a US hospital after an uncomplicated pregnancy and has been generally healthy. His parents first became concerned about his development when he was 16 months old. He stopped saying mama/dada in Spanish and started lining up random objects. He had frequent temper tantrums and was difficult to console during unexpected changes in his routine. He screened positive on the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) at his 18-month well-child visit, and his pediatrician referred him to the local early intervention program. Calls from the early intervention program to his parents were unanswered. At his 24-month well-child visit, he again screened positive on the M-CHAT-R/F, and his pediatrician placed a referral for a DBP consultation. During the DBP visit at 28 months of age, developmental testing indicated his receptive and expressive language skills to be in the extremely low range, with significant scatter in his cognitive and adaptive skills. Behavioral observations were consistent with parental history and showed differences in social communication and interaction, the presence of repetitive behaviors, and extreme distress with transitions. He was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Recommendations, including referral to early intervention, applied behavior analysis therapy, speech and language therapy, audiology evaluation, and genetic testing, were discussed with his parents through an interpreter. An autism packet, written in Spanish, with detailed information about autism and community resources was given to the family. By the time of a follow-up DBP visit 6 months later, Leo had not started on any early intervention or therapeutic services. Where do you go from here?

    View details for DOI 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001322

    View details for PubMedID 39446066

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-5203