Academic Appointments

Administrative Appointments

  • Chief Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Officer, Stanford Medicine (2022 - Present)
  • Associate Dean, Stanford University School of Medicine (2022 - Present)

Contact

  • Academic
    University - Academic staff Department: Med/Primary Care and Population Health Position: Chief Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Officer

All Publications

  • Guidance for unbiased predictive information for healthcare decision-making and equity (GUIDE): considerations when race may be a prognostic factor. NPJ digital medicine Ladin, K., Cuddeback, J., Duru, O. K., Goel, S., Harvey, W., Park, J. G., Paulus, J. K., Sackey, J., Sharp, R., Steyerberg, E., Ustun, B., van Klaveren, D., Weingart, S. N., Kent, D. M. 2024; 7 (1): 290

    Abstract

    Clinical prediction models (CPMs) are tools that compute the risk of an outcome given a set of patient characteristics and are routinely used to inform patients, guide treatment decision-making, and resource allocation. Although much hope has been placed on CPMs to mitigate human biases, CPMs may potentially contribute to racial disparities in decision-making and resource allocation. While some policymakers, professional organizations, and scholars have called for eliminating race as a variable from CPMs, others raise concerns that excluding race may exacerbate healthcare disparities and this controversy remains unresolved. The Guidance for Unbiased predictive Information for healthcare Decision-making and Equity (GUIDE) provides expert guidelines for model developers and health system administrators on the transparent use of race in CPMs and mitigation of algorithmic bias across contexts developed through a 5-round, modified Delphi process from a diverse 14-person technical expert panel (TEP). Deliberations affirmed that race is a social construct and that the goals of prediction are distinct from those of causal inference, and emphasized: the importance of decisional context (e.g., shared decision-making versus healthcare rationing); the conflicting nature of different anti-discrimination principles (e.g., anticlassification versus antisubordination principles); and the importance of identifying and balancing trade-offs in achieving equity-related goals with race-aware versus race-unaware CPMs for conditions where racial identity is prognostically informative. The GUIDE, comprising 31 key items in the development and use of CPMs in healthcare, outlines foundational principles, distinguishes between bias and fairness, and offers guidance for examining subgroup invalidity and using race as a variable in CPMs. This GUIDE presents a living document that supports appraisal and reporting of bias in CPMs to support best practice in CPM development and use.

    View details for DOI 10.1038/s41746-024-01245-y

    View details for PubMedID 39427028