Paul Youngmin Yoo
Postdoctoral Scholar, Education
Bio
Paul Youngmin Yoo is a postdoctoral scholar at Stanford University. He studies how schools and policies shape opportunities to inform what we do about child poverty and educational inequality. He is an IES (Institute of Education Sciences) postdoctoral fellow at the Stanford Center on Early Childhood and was a National Academy of Education/Spencer Foundation dissertation fellow.
Professional Education
-
Doctor of Philosophy, University of California Irvine (2024)
-
Master of Education, University of California Irvine (2024)
-
Master of Education, Harvard University (2015)
-
Bachelor of Science, University for California, San Diego (2008)
Stanford Advisors
-
sean reardon, Postdoctoral Research Mentor
-
francis pearman, Postdoctoral Faculty Sponsor
Research Interests
-
Achievement
-
Child Development
-
Early Childhood
-
Economics and Education
-
Educational Policy
-
Equity in Education
-
Poverty and Inequality
-
School Choice
-
Sociology
All Publications
-
Poverty reduction and childhood opportunity moves: A randomized trial of cash transfers to low-income U.S. families with infants.
Health & place
2024; 89: 103320
Abstract
Black and Hispanic children have a higher likelihood of experiencing neighborhood poverty than white children. This study uses data from the Baby's First Years (BFY) randomized trial to examine whether an unconditional cash transfer causes families to make opportunity moves to better quality neighborhoods. We use Intent to Treat linear regression models to test whether the BFY treatment, of receiving $333/month (vs. $20/month) for three years, leads to moves to neighborhoods of greater childhood opportunity. Overall, we find no relation between the BFY treatment and neighborhood opportunity across time. However, we find effect modification by maternal baseline health. High-cash receipt among mothers with poor health at baseline corresponds with moves to neighborhoods of greater childhood opportunity.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103320
View details for PubMedID 39096582
-
Early Algebra Affects Peer Composition
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS
2024
View details for DOI 10.3102/01623737241267957
View details for Web of Science ID 001298495000001
-
Measuring School Economic Disadvantage
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS
2024
View details for DOI 10.3102/01623737231217683
View details for Web of Science ID 001138507400001
-
Predicting adolescent and young adult outcomes from emotional support and cognitive stimulation offered by preschool-age home and early care and education settings.
Developmental psychology
2023; 59 (12): 2189-2203
Abstract
Children's early environmental experiences are often considered highly influential for later life development. Yet, environmental contexts, such as the home and early care and education (ECE) setting, and multiple aspects of each setting, are not typically examined concurrently. In this study, we examined associations between cognitive stimulation and emotional support in the home and ECE setting during the preschool years (36-54 months) with adolescent (age 15; n = 708; 52% female) and adult (age 26; n = 584; 54% female) outcomes using data from the Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, a study conducted at 10 sites across the United States. Cognitive stimulation in the home was significantly related to increased academic achievement at age 15 and educational attainment at age 26. Home emotional support was related to decreased behavior problems and increased social skills at age 15. No significant associations were found between either emotional support or cognitive stimulation in ECE and children's later development. These findings provide further support that the child's home environment during early childhood plays a substantial role in development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
View details for DOI 10.1037/dev0001576
View details for PubMedID 37616123
-
Unconditional cash transfers and maternal substance use: findings from a randomized control trial of low-income mothers with infants in the U.S.
BMC public health
2022; 22 (1): 897
Abstract
Policy debates over anti-poverty programs are often marked by pernicious stereotypes suggesting that direct cash transfers to people residing in poverty encourage health-risking behaviors such as smoking, drinking, and other substance use. Causal evidence on this issue is limited in the U.S. Given the prominent role of child allowances and other forms of cash assistance in the 2021 American Rescue Plan and proposed Build Back Better legislation, evidence on the extent to which a monthly unconditional cash gift changes substance use patterns among low-income mothers with infants warrants attention, particularly in the context of economic supports that can help improve early environments of children.We employ a multi-site, parallel-group, randomized control trial in which 1,000 low-income mothers in the U.S. with newborns were recruited from hospitals shortly after the infant's birth and randomly assigned to receive either a substantial ($333) or a nominal ($20) monthly cash gift during the early years of the infant's life. We estimate the effect of the unconditional cash transfer on self-report measures of maternal substance use (i.e., alcohol, cigarette, or opioid use) and household expenditures on alcohol and cigarettes after one year of cash gifts.The cash gift difference of $313 per month had small and statistically nonsignificant impacts on group differences in maternal reports of substance use and household expenditures on alcohol or cigarettes. Effect sizes ranged between - 0.067 standard deviations and + 0.072 standard deviations. The estimated share of the $313 group difference spent on alcohol and tobacco was less than 1%.Our randomized control trial of monthly cash gifts to mothers with newborn infants finds that a cash gift difference of $313 per month did not significantly change maternal use of alcohol, cigarettes, or opioids or household expenditures on alcohol or cigarettes. Although the structure of our cash gifts differs somewhat from that of a government-provided child allowance, our null effect findings suggest that unconditional cash transfers aimed at families living in poverty are unlikely to induce large changes in substance use and expenditures by recipients.Registered on Clinical Trials.gov NCT03593356 in July of 2018.
View details for DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-12989-1
View details for PubMedID 35513842
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9070980
-
School Discipline and Racial Disparities in Early Adulthood.
Educational researcher (Washington, D.C. : 1972)
2022; 51 (3): 231-234
Abstract
Despite interest in the contributions of school discipline to the creation of racial inequality, previous research has been unable to identify how students who receive suspensions in school differ from unsuspended classmates on key young adult outcomes. We utilize novel data to document the links between high school discipline and important young adult outcomes related to criminal justice contact, social safety net program participation, post-secondary education, and the labor market. We show that the link between school discipline and young adult outcomes tends to be stronger for Black students than for White students, and that approximately 30 percent of the Black-White disparities in young adult criminal justice outcomes, SNAP receipt, and college completion can be traced back to inequalities in exposure to school discipline.
View details for DOI 10.3102/0013189x211061732
View details for PubMedID 35874270
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC9307071