Sheila Sree Enamandram
Adjunct Clinical Instructor, Radiology
Clinical Focus
- Diagnostic Radiology
Professional Education
-
Board Certification: American Board of Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology (2025)
-
Fellowship: Stanford School of Medicine (2025) CA
-
Internship: UCSD Internal Medicine Residency CA
-
Residency: Stanford University Radiology Residency (2024) CA
-
Medical Education: Harvard Medical School (2019) MA
All Publications
-
Mammary small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas that showed excellent pathologic response following etoposide-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Breast cancer research and treatment
2025; 215 (1): 10
Abstract
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) is a very rare, highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer. There are no standard recommendations for the management of mammary SCNEC, and the use and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are not well studied. Etoposide is an agent not included in guidelines for the management of breast cancer but traditionally used in the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the lung.We searched for institutional and consultation cases of breast SCNEC and identified those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical, pathologic, and genetic findings of two patients with SCNEC of the breast treated with etoposide are described. Additionally, we performed a literature review of all known cases of mammary SCNEC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy to date.These two women were the sole patients who underwent neoadjuvant etoposide-based chemotherapy followed by surgery for breast SCNEC at our institution in the past 25 years. Both patients achieved excellent imaging and pathologic responses, with no evidence of residual carcinoma in the subsequent breast excisions.Etoposide may be considered as a therapeutic option in the neoadjuvant setting of breast SCNEC. More reports on this very rare breast cancer subtype and response to treatment are needed.
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10549-025-07854-9
View details for PubMedID 41269341
View details for PubMedCentralID 9514991
-
Caution on the Use of 68Ga-DOTATATE for the Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma: A Report of 2 Cases.
JCEM case reports
2023; 1 (6): luad149
Abstract
Pheochromocytomas are intra-adrenal sympathetic neuroendocrine tumors that arise from chromaffin cells. Paragangliomas similarly arise from chromaffin cells, although at extra-adrenal sites such as sympathetic paraganglia in the abdomen/thorax, or parasympathetic paraganglia in the head/neck. Collectively, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are important to diagnose and resect because they may secrete harmful levels of catecholamines, have mass effects, hemorrhage, and/or metastasize. Anatomic imaging of pheochromocytomas is usually completed with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging; however, functional imaging may be used to provide additional localization, staging, and/or biologic information. Accordingly, selection of the proper functional imaging modality can be critical to developing the optimal therapeutic strategy. 68Gallium- and 64Copper-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-octreotate positron emission tomography computed tomography (68Ga- and 64Cu-DOTATATE) are widely used in evaluating pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, although data regarding the sensitivity for diagnosing pheochromocytoma are limited. We report 2 cases of pheochromocytoma that showed nondiagnostic 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake but were subsequently visualized using alternative functional imaging modalities. Additionally, we provide a review of the literature to highlight the underappreciated limitations of functional adrenal imaging with somatostatin-based compounds.
View details for DOI 10.1210/jcemcr/luad149
View details for PubMedID 38045868
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC10690848
-
Peer Learning in Radiology: Effect of a Pay-for-Performance Initiative on Clinical Impact and Usage.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology
2021: 1–9
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to assess the effects of a pay-for-performance (PFP) initiative on clinical impact and usage of a radiology peer learning tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study was performed at a large academic hospital. On May 1, 2017, a peer learning tool was implemented to facilitate radiologist peer feedback including clinical follow-up, positive feedback, and consultation. Subsequently, PFP target numbers for peer learning tool alerts by subspecialty divisions (October 1, 2017) and individual radiologists (October 1, 2018) were set. The primary outcome was report addendum rate (percent of clinical follow-up alerts with addenda), which was a proxy for peer learning tool clinical impact. Secondary outcomes were peer learning tool usage rate (number of peer learning tool alerts per 1000 radiology reports) and proportion of clinical follow-up alerts (percent of clinical follow-ups among all peer learning tool alerts). Outcomes were assessed biweekly using ANOVA and statistical process control analyses. RESULTS. Among 1,265,839 radiology reports from May 1, 2017, to September 29, 2019, a total of 20,902 peer learning tool alerts were generated. The clinical follow-up alert addendum rate was not significantly different between the period before the PFP initiative (9.9%) and the periods including division-wide (8.3%) and individual (7.9%) PFP initiatives (p = .55; ANOVA). Peer learning tool usage increased from 2.2 alerts per 1000 reports before the PFP initiative to 12.6 per 1000 during the division-wide PFP period (5.7-fold increase; 12.6/2.2), to 25.2 in the individual PFP period (11.5-fold increase vs before PFP; twofold increase vs division-wide) (p < .001). The clinical follow-up alert proportion decreased from 37.5% before the PFP initiative, to 34.4% in the division-wide period, to 31.3% in the individual PFP period. CONCLUSION. A PFP initiative improved radiologist engagement in peer learning by marked increase in peer learning tool usage rate without a change in report addendum rate as a proxy for clinical impact.
View details for DOI 10.2214/AJR.20.23253
View details for PubMedID 33787297