Tom A.D. Stone
Ph.D. Student in Electrical Engineering, admitted Autumn 2025
Bio
I am a mathematician and engineer by training and am driven to use my analytical skills to better understand brain networks through physiologically informed signal processing, information theory, network theory, dynamical systems, and topological methods. I am particularly interested in alterations of brain networks due to drugs and pathologies such as anesthetics, cancer, chemotherapeutic drugs, neurodegenerative diseases, and radiation exposure.
Education & Certifications
-
Sc.M., Brown University, Mathematics (2020)
-
B.A., University of Wisconsin - Madison, Mathematics (2018)
Current Research and Scholarly Interests
EEG Signal Processing for Clinical Neuroscience
All Publications
-
A Prospective Study Characterizing Cognitive Function in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Clinical and translational gastroenterology
2026
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be associated with cognitive impairment. Cognitive decline is also linked to weaker anesthesia-induced alpha wave electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. We aimed to characterize the associations between cognition and EEG alpha power in patients with IBD.In this prospective cohort study, patients with IBD and controls undergoing diagnostic or screening colonoscopies underwent preprocedural cognitive testing using the tablet-based Brain Health Assessment (BHA), intraprocedural EEG monitoring, and follow-up testing. Primary outcomes were BHA scores and EEG alpha power. Secondary outcomes included within-participant changes in cognitive performance.We enrolled 40 patients with IBD and 42 control patients. Fifteen IBD patients and 17 controls completed follow-up cognitive testing 6-18 months after endoscopy. Patients with IBD were younger (mean age 42 vs. 56 years, p<0.001), more likely to screen positively for depression (p=0.004), and had fewer years of education (16.2 vs. 17.3 years, p=0.03). Fifteen IBD patients had active endoscopic inflammation. Adjusting for demographics, education level, and depression, EEG alpha power did not differ between groups. Median BHA scores indicated moderate likelihood of cognitive impairment in both groups. However, controls demonstrated improved within-participant follow-up performance (p<0.01), while IBD patients did not (p=0.16).IBD patients and controls demonstrate preprocedural cognitive impairment on BHA, but no differences in EEG alpha power. Lack of follow-up improvement in IBD patients may suggest lower baseline cognitive function while highlighting the importance of further investigations on cognition in this population.
View details for DOI 10.14309/ctg.0000000000001036
View details for PubMedID 41995584
-
Intraoperative Electroencephalogram Alpha Power Associated with Mortality: Reply.
Anesthesiology
2025; 143 (5): 1425-1427
View details for DOI 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005676
View details for PubMedID 41085317
-
The Effects of Timing of Intraoperative Opioid Administration on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use Outcomes
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. 2025: 734-738
View details for Web of Science ID 001551889100285
-
Intraoperative Frontal EEG Alpha Power is Associated with Postoperative Mortality and Other Adverse Outcomes
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. 2025: 554-558
View details for Web of Science ID 001551889100215
-
EEG Artifact Removal Using Switching State Space Models 2025
2025 59th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers
2025: 6
View details for DOI 10.1109/IEEECONF67917.2025.11443890
-
Electroencephalographic (EEG) Characteristics in Children Undergoing Sevoflurane Anesthesia: Comparing EEG-Guided Anesthesia vs Standard Care
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. 2024: 677
View details for Web of Science ID 001349531300264
-
Development and multicentre validation of the FLEX score: personalised preoperative surgical risk prediction using attention-based ICD-10 and Current Procedural Terminology set embeddings.
British journal of anaesthesia
2024
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preoperative knowledge of surgical risks can improve perioperative care and patient outcomes. However, assessments requiring clinician examination of patients or manual chart review can be too burdensome for routine use.METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of 243 479 adult noncardiac surgical patients at four hospitals within the Mass General Brigham (MGB) system in the USA. We developed a machine learning method using routinely collected coding and patient characteristics data from the electronic health record which predicts 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, discharge to long-term care, and hospital length of stay.RESULTS: Our method, the Flexible Surgical Set Embedding (FLEX) score, achieved state-of-the-art performance to identify comorbidities that significantly contribute to the risk of each adverse outcome. The contributions of comorbidities are weighted based on patient-specific context, yielding personalised risk predictions. Understanding the significant drivers of risk of adverse outcomes for each patient can inform clinicians of potential targets for intervention.CONCLUSIONS: FLEX utilises information from a wider range of medical diagnostic and procedural codes than previously possible and can adapt to different coding practices to accurately predict adverse postoperative outcomes.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2023.11.039
View details for PubMedID 38184474
-
Development and prospective validation of postoperative pain prediction from preoperative EHR data using attention-based set embeddings.
NPJ digital medicine
2023; 6 (1): 209
Abstract
Preoperative knowledge of expected postoperative pain can help guide perioperative pain management and focus interventions on patients with the greatest risk of acute pain. However, current methods for predicting postoperative pain require patient and clinician input or laborious manual chart review and often do not achieve sufficient performance. We use routinely collected electronic health record data from a multicenter dataset of 234,274 adult non-cardiac surgical patients to develop a machine learning method which predicts maximum pain scores on the day of surgery and four subsequent days and validate this method in a prospective cohort. Our method, POPS, is fully automated and relies only on data available prior to surgery, allowing application in all patients scheduled for or considering surgery. Here we report that POPS achieves state-of-the-art performance and outperforms clinician predictions on all postoperative days when predicting maximum pain on the 0-10 NRS in prospective validation, though with degraded calibration. POPS is interpretable, identifying comorbidities that significantly contribute to postoperative pain based on patient-specific context, which can assist clinicians in mitigating cases of acute pain.
View details for DOI 10.1038/s41746-023-00947-z
View details for PubMedID 37973817
View details for PubMedCentralID 8369227
-
Association of Intraoperative Opioid Administration With Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use
JAMA SURGERY
2023
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2009
View details for Web of Science ID 001012129000006
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-6092