Tyler Patrick Tate
Clinical Associate Professor, Pediatrics
Bio
Tyler Tate, MD, MA, is a pediatrician, palliative care physician, and ethicist at Stanford. His academic interests include suffering and flourishing, love and emotions, religion and bioethics, narrative and metaphor theory, sociolinguistics, and pediatric ethics. He practices pediatric palliative care and serves as a clinical ethicist at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford. He is also core faculty in the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics (SCBE). Prior to coming to Stanford he was an assistant professor at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) in Portland, Oregon.
Clinical Focus
- Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Academic Appointments
-
Clinical Associate Professor, Pediatrics
Honors & Awards
-
Greenwall Faculty Scholar, Greenwall Foundation (2024-2027)
-
Hastings Center Cunniff-Dixon Early-Career Physician Award, Cunniff-Dixon Foundation (2024)
-
Portland Top Doctor, Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Portland Monthly (2021–2024)
Professional Education
-
Board Certification: American Board of Pediatrics, Hospice and Palliative Medicine (2018)
-
Fellowship: Duke University School of Medicine (2018) NC
-
Fellowship: University of Washington Childrens Hospital and Regional Medical Center (2017) WA
-
Board Certification: American Board of Pediatrics, Pediatrics (2015)
-
Residency: University of Washington Pediatric Residency (2015) WA
-
Medical Education: University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine (2012) AL
-
Fellowship, Duke University, Hospice & Palliative Medicine (2018)
-
Fellowship, University of Washington/Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Clinical Ethics (2017)
-
Residency, University of Washington/Seattle Children's Hospital, Pediatrics (2015)
-
M.A., University of Washington, Bioethics (2017)
-
MD, UAB Heersink School of Medicine, Medicine (2012)
-
B.S., Maryville University of St. Louis, Molecular Biology and Philosophy (2008)
All Publications
-
"Control Freaks": Evaluating Concerns of Ableism in the Perinatal Environment.
Perspectives in biology and medicine
2024; 67 (4): 619-630
Abstract
This essay explores the relationship between the modern era's impulse toward control and the practices of family planning and disability-selective abortion. Drawing from experiences as a pediatric palliative care physician working within a busy fetal care program, as well as the social theory of sociologist Hartmut Rosa, the author argues that there is an unresolved cultural and professional conflict within perinatal medicine between maximizing control of the future and maximizing a culture of anti-ableism.
View details for DOI 10.1353/pbm.2024.a942084
View details for PubMedID 39523972
-
It Starts With a Story: A Four-Step Narrative-Based Framework for Serious Illness Conversations.
Journal of palliative medicine
2024
Abstract
Background: As a key component of advance care planning, serious illness conversations form a core intervention in palliative care. To achieve effective serious illness conversations, acknowledgment and inclusion of patient sense of self and identity are critical. However, no framework exists to describe how goals, values, and choices relate to patient identity. This conceptual gap hinders the advancement of palliative care education and practice. Objective: This philosophical investigation aimed to explicate two items: first, a novel conceptual framework for serious illness conversations; second, a structured approach to optimize these conversations within the palliative care clinical context. Methods: A philosophical and theoretical analysis was performed within an interdisciplinary context, by scholars in palliative care, medical humanities, philosophy, and bioethics. Key literature in psychology, qualitative research on the experience of serious illness, medical ethics, and choice architecture in medical decision-making were reviewed, and a structured conceptual and narrative analysis was performed. Results: An original and innovative identity-centered conceptual framework for serious illness conversations was developed. The framework consists of a four-step, reproducible approach: (1) attend to patient narrative identity, (2) identify values, (3) cocreate goals, and (4) actively promote choices. In short: attend, identify, create, and promote (AICP). Discussion: By using this conceptual framework and four-step approach, clinicians can accomplish goal-concordant serious illness care and build rich clinical relationships that foster trust and goodwill.
View details for DOI 10.1089/jpm.2024.0088
View details for PubMedID 38968377
-
Structured Framework for Multidisciplinary Parent Counseling and Medical Interventions for Fetuses and Infants with Trisomy 13 or Trisomy 18.
American journal of perinatology
2024; 41 (S 01): e2666-e2673
Abstract
Trisomy 13 (T13) and 18 (T18) are aneuploidies associated with multiple structural congenital anomalies and high rates of fetal demise and neonatal mortality. Historically, patients with either one of these diagnoses have been treated similarly with exclusive comfort care rather than invasive interventions or intensive care, despite a wide phenotypic variation and substantial variations in survival length. However, surgical interventions have been on the rise in this population in recent years without clearly elucidated selection criterion. Our objective was to create a standardized approach to counseling expectant persons and parents of newborns with T13/T18 in order to provide collaborative and consistent counseling and thoughtful approach to interventions such as surgery.This article describes our process and presents our resulting clinical care guideline.We formed a multi- and interdisciplinary committee. We used published literature when available and otherwise expert opinion to develop an approach to care featuring individualized assessment of the patient to estimate qualitative mortality risk and potential to benefit from intensive care and/or surgeries centered within an ethical framework.Through multidisciplinary collaboration, we successfully created a patient-centered approach for counseling families facing a diagnosis of T13/T18. Other institutions may use our approach as a model for developing their own standardized approach.· Trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 are associated with high but variable morbidity and mortality.. · Research on which patients are most likely to benefit from surgery is lacking.. · We present our institution's framework to counsel families with fetal/neonatal T13/T18..
View details for DOI 10.1055/s-0043-1772748
View details for PubMedID 37619598
-
From Sickness unto Life: How Community and Belonging Can Bolster Wellbeing During Serious Illness and End-of-Life Care
Narratives of Wellbeing
Palgrave Macmillan. 2024: 127-141
View details for DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-59519-6_8
-
Tyler Tate replies.
The Hastings Center report
2023; 53 (4): 46-47
Abstract
The author responds to a letter by D. Brendan Johnson in the July-August 2023 issue of the Hastings Center Report concerning his and Joseph Clair's article "Love Your Patient as Yourself: On Reviving the Broken Heart of American Medical Ethics."
View details for DOI 10.1002/hast.1503
View details for PubMedID 37549365
-
Maternal-fetal surgery as part of pediatric palliative care.
Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine
2023; 28 (3): 101440
Abstract
Maternal-fetal surgical interventions have become a more common part of prenatal care. This third option, beside termination or post-natal interventions, complicates prenatal decision-making: while interventions may be lifesaving, survivors may face a life with disability. Pediatric palliative care (PPC) is more than end of life or hospice care, it aims at helping patients with complex medical conditions live well. In this paper, we briefly discuss maternal-fetal surgery, challenges regarding counseling and benefit-risk evaluation, argue that PPC should be a routine part of prenatal consultation, discuss the pivotal role of the maternal-fetal surgeon in the PCC-team, and finally discuss some of the ethical considerations of maternal-fetal surgery. We illustrate this with a case example of an infant diagnosed with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.siny.2023.101440
View details for PubMedID 37173213
-
Love Your Patient as Yourself: On Reviving the Broken Heart of American Medical Ethics.
The Hastings Center report
2023; 53 (2): 12-25
Abstract
This article presents a radical claim: American medical ethics is broken, and it needs love to be healed. Due to a unique set of cultural and economic pressures, American medical ethics has adopted a mechanistic mode of ethical reasoning epitomized by the doctrine of principlism. This mode of reasoning divorces clinicians from both their patients and themselves. This results in clinicians who can ace ethics questions on multiple-choice tests but who fail either to recognize a patient's humanity or to navigate the ethical quandaries into which they are frequently thrown. Drawing on personal experience as well as the philosophical work of Augustine of Hippo, Simone Weil, and Iris Murdoch, we propose a novel ethical approach grounded in a conception of neighbor love, specifically, the virtue of love understood as attention to a sufferer's humanity. We conclude with five practical recommendations for reimagining medical ethics education oriented around the virtue of love.
View details for DOI 10.1002/hast.1470
View details for PubMedID 37092648
-
"More than conquerors": a qualitative analysis of war metaphors for patients with cancer.
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
2022; 31 (1): 87
Abstract
Meaning-making is fundamental to the cancer experience and communication within cancer care is saturated with metaphors. The objective of this study was to better understand the impact and function of war metaphors among patients with cancer.Patients at the Duke Cancer Center were purposively sampled for inclusion based on type and stage of their cancer. Each patient underwent a semi-structured interview to explore their use of metaphors in their lived experience with cancer. Qualitative interviews broadly explored two key areas of interest: (1) frequency and use of metaphors to describe cancer diagnosis, treatment, or survivorship; (2) function and impact of the war metaphor on the patient experience of cancer.Fifteen participants with either breast, lung, or colorectal cancer were interviewed. Most patients used metaphor themes of journey, war, and mystery to describe their cancer. All patients with non-metastatic disease used war metaphors and described how these metaphors facilitated meaning-making by promoting positivity and situating cancer within a larger life story. The few patients who did not use war metaphors had metastatic disease, and they explained that war metaphors were unhelpful due to feeling a lack of control over their metastatic disease and outcomes.The war metaphor should remain an integral part of cancer care. Disregarding war metaphors robs patients of an important framework for meaning-making-one that may promote strength, continuity, and resilience in navigating cancer.
View details for DOI 10.1007/s00520-022-07552-y
View details for PubMedID 36573958
-
"A Shell of My Former Self": Using Figurative Language to Promote Communication About Patient Suffering.
Narrative inquiry in bioethics
2022; 12 (2): 153-165
Abstract
While the relief of suffering is an important goal of medicine, suffering is often missed or ignored in clinical practice. We believe that this occurs for two reasons. First, clinicians often approach suffering by focusing on the causes of suffering rather than the experience of suffering. Second, the subjective nature of suffering makes it difficult to discuss. To address these gaps, we read 52 relevant works of literature and performed qualitative analysis to categorize figurative language into themes of psychological (i.e., non-physical) suffering. We identified 254 excerpts of figurative language characterizing psychological suffering. Among these excerpts, 13 salient themes recurred, including: brokenness, diminishment, disorientation, drowning, emptiness, imprisonment, battle, darkness, isolation, invisibility, lifelessness, punishment, and torture. The development of a shared language of suffering can foster a therapeutic patient-clinician relationship and improve clinicians' ability to recognize and address a patient's experience of suffering.
View details for DOI 10.1353/nib.2022.0041
View details for PubMedID 36373536
-
Can Parents Restrict Access to Their Adolescent's Voice?: Deciding About a Tracheostomy.
Pediatrics
2021; 147 (4)
Abstract
Parents are the default decision-makers for their infants and children. Their decisions should be based on the best interests of their children. Differing interpretations of children's best interests may be a source of conflict. Providers' biased evaluations of patients' quality of life may undermine medicine's trustworthiness. As children mature, they should participate in medical decision-making to the extent that is developmentally appropriate. In this month's Ethics Rounds, physicians, a philosopher, and a lawyer consider parents' demand, supported by the hospital's legal department, that their 17-year-old son be excluded from a potentially life-and-death medical decision.
View details for DOI 10.1542/peds.2021-050358
View details for PubMedID 33785636
-
What we talk about when we talk about pediatric suffering
THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS
2020; 41 (4): 143-163
Abstract
In this paper I aim to show why pediatric suffering must be understood as a judgment or evaluation, rather than a mental state. To accomplish this task, first I analyze the various ways that the label of suffering is used in pediatric practice. Out of this analysis emerge what I call the twin poles of pediatric suffering. At one pole sits the belief that infants and children with severe cognitive impairment cannot suffer because they are nonverbal or lack subjective life experience. At the other pole exists the idea that once child suffering reaches some threshold it is ethical to eliminate the sufferer. Concerningly, at both poles, any particular child vanishes from view. Second, in an attempt to identify a theory of suffering inclusive of children, I examine two prominent so-called experiential accounts of suffering. I find them both wanting on account of their absurd entailments and their flawed assumptions regarding the subjective experiences of people who cannot communicate expressively. Finally, I extend arguments found in Alastair MacIntyre's Dependent Rational Animals to argue that child suffering can be understood only as a set of absences-absences of conditions such as love, warmth, and freedom from pain. An evaluation of these absences reveals the exquisite dependency of children. It also discloses why pediatric suffering is necessarily a social and political event. Unlike adults, children will never be either the authors or the mitigators of their own suffering. Rather, children must rely wholly on others in order to resist suffering, grow, and flourish.
View details for DOI 10.1007/s11017-020-09535-8
View details for Web of Science ID 000605105100001
View details for PubMedID 33400057
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC7784220
-
When Following the Rules Feels Wrong.
The Hastings Center report
2021; 51 (1): 4-5
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has created a clinical environment in which health care practitioners are experiencing moral distress in numerous and novel ways. In this narrative reflection, a pediatric palliative care physician explores how his hospital's strict visitation policy set the stage for moral distress when, in the early months of the pandemic, it prevented two parents from being together at the bedside of their dying child.
View details for DOI 10.1002/hast.1211
View details for PubMedID 33630326
-
Ethical issues in palliative care research
Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine, 6 edn
edited by Cherny, N. I., Fallon , M. T., Kaasa, S., Portenoy, R. K., Currow, D. C.
Oxford University Press. 2021; 6th: 1312–1317
View details for DOI 10.1093/med/9780198821328.003.0124
-
Your Father's a Fighter; Your Daughter's a Vegetable: A Critical Analysis of the Use of Metaphor in Clinical Practice.
The Hastings Center report
2020; 50 (5): 20-29
Abstract
There are two widespread beliefs about the use of metaphors in clinical medicine. The first is that military metaphors are harmful to patients and should be discouraged in medical practice. The second is that the metaphors of clinical practice can be judged by and standardized in reference to neutral criteria. In this article, I evaluate both these beliefs, exposing their shared flawed logic. This logic underwrites the false empiricist assumptions that metaphorical language and literal language are fundamentally distinct, play separate roles in communication, and therefore can be independently analyzed, systematized, and prescribed. Next, using the resources of ordinary language philosophy, I lay out a theoretical view of medical metaphors that is grounded in metaphor use within clinician-patient relationships. Finally, drawing on the work of philosopher Max Black, I diagram a practical conceptual framework for clinicians to use when they consider whether a metaphor is appropriate for a specific patient encounter.
View details for DOI 10.1002/hast.1182
View details for PubMedID 33095486
-
Philosophical investigations into the essence of pediatric suffering.
Theoretical medicine and bioethics
2020; 41 (4): 137-142
View details for DOI 10.1007/s11017-020-09531-y
View details for PubMedID 33331997
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC7745706
-
Pediatric Suffering and the Burden of Proof.
Pediatrics
2020; 146 (Suppl 1): S70-S74
Abstract
The alleviation of suffering has always been central to the care of the sick. Yet as medical technology has advanced and life-sustaining treatments multiplied, medicine's capacity to both prevent and create suffering has grown exponentially. In pediatric medicine, the ability to stave off death with life-sustaining treatments allows children to survive but also to suffer in ways that are diverse and unprecedented. However, although parents and pediatric clinicians broadly agree that all children can suffer, there is little published literature in which researchers analyze or clarify the concept of pediatric suffering. This gap is worrisome, especially in light of growing concerns that the label of suffering is used to justify end-of-life decision-making and mask quality-of-life determinations for pediatric patients with profound neurologic impairment. Moreover, the awareness that some children can experience suffering but cannot communicate whether and how they are suffering creates a problem. Does the determination of suffering in a nonverbal child lie in the judgement of clinicians or parents? In this article, I will address several important questions related to the suffering of children through an analysis of two prevalent conceptualizations of pediatric suffering and suggest a possible avenue forward for future scholarship.
View details for DOI 10.1542/peds.2020-0818N
View details for PubMedID 32737236
-
What We Mean When We Talk About Suffering-and Why Eric Cassell Should Not Have the Last Word.
Perspectives in biology and medicine
2019; 62 (1): 95-110
Abstract
This paper analyzes the phenomenon of suffering and its relationship to medical practice by focusing on the paradigmatic work of Eric Cassell. First, it explains Cassell's influential model of suffering. Second, it surveys various critiques of Cassell. Next it outlines the authors' concerns with Cassell's model: it is aggressive, obscure, and fails to capture important features of the suffering experience. Finally, the authors propose a conceptual framework to help clarify the distinctive nature of subjective patient suffering. This framework contains two necessary conditions: (1) a loss of a person's sense of self, and (2) a negative affective experience. The authors suggest how this framework can be used in the medical encounter to promote clinician-patient communication and the relief of suffering.
View details for DOI 10.1353/pbm.2019.0005
View details for PubMedID 31031299
-
Empathetic Practice: The Struggle and Virtue of Empathizing with a Patient's Suffering.
The Hastings Center report
2019; 49 (2): 17-25
Abstract
In this article, our analysis of empathy in the clinical context hinges on the complexities of patients who are acutely suffering. Using a case concerning a heart transplant patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Alex, and his nurse, Joe, we investigate how empathy's phenomenological nebulousness can generate doubts about its virtue. Even when asking, "How are you, Alex?" Joe hates the question; it seems empty, silly. Cases like this show both that the enactment of empathy is sometimes challenging and that it can be reasonable to wonder if empathy is a virtue at all. Perhaps Alex's suffering is simply too massive: Joe cannot possibly know how he feels, so why try? Perhaps empathy would only cause Joe to suffer along with Alex. Not only is empathy difficult to produce in the context of Alex's suffering; it may not even be possible; and if we simply cannot muster empathy, what is the point of morally demanding it? In response, we distinguish different kinds of empathic engagements from one another and offer separate counsel. We argue that it is important to understand empathy as something that must be honed across varied contexts before it can be called a virtue. Conceptualizing and operationalizing empathy in this way helps to ground its possibility and virtue even in the most challenging and complex clinical encounters.
View details for DOI 10.1002/hast.989
View details for PubMedID 30998276
-
Listen to Me.
Journal of palliative medicine
2019; 22 (2): 228-229
View details for DOI 10.1089/jpm.2018.0310
View details for PubMedID 30707074
-
Using Metaphors and Figurative Language to Improve Communication About Patient Suffering
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. 2018: E68-E69
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.193
View details for Web of Science ID 000451633700105
-
The Liminal Space: A Lamentation on Faith, Nihilism, and the Senseless Death of a Child.
Journal of palliative medicine
2018; 21 (11): 1666-1667
View details for DOI 10.1089/jpm.2018.0163
View details for PubMedID 30383514
-
"I'm Not a Spiritual Person." How Hope Might Facilitate Conversations About Spirituality Among Teens and Young Adults With Cancer.
Journal of pain and symptom management
2018; 55 (6): 1599-1608
Abstract
Supporting patients' spiritual needs is central to palliative care. Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) may be developing their spiritual identities; it is unclear how to navigate conversations concerning their spiritual needs.To 1) describe spiritual narratives among AYAs based on their self-identification as religious, spiritual, both, or neither and 2) identify language to support AYAs' spiritual needs in keeping with their self-identities.In this mixed-methods, prospective, longitudinal cohort study, AYAs (14-25 years old) with newly diagnosed cancer self-reported their "religiousness" and "spirituality." One-on-one, semistructured interviews were conducted at three time points (within 60 days of diagnosis, six to 12 months, and 12-18 months later) and included queries about spirituality, God/prayer, meaning from illness, and evolving self-identity. Post hoc directed content analysis informed a framework for approaching religious/spiritual discussions.Seventeen AYAs (mean age 17.1 years, SD = 2.7, 47% male) participated in 44 interviews. Of n = 16 with concurrent survey responses, five (31%) self-identified as both "religious and spiritual," five (31%) as "spiritual, not religious," one (6%) as "religious, not spiritual," and five (31%) as neither. Those who endorsed religiousness tended to cite faith as a source of strength, whereas many who declined this self-identity explicitly questioned their preexisting beliefs. Regardless of self-identified "religiousness" or "spirituality," most participants endorsed quests for meaning, purpose, and/or legacy, and all included constructs of hope in their narratives.AYA self-identities evolve during the illness experience. When words such as "religion" and "spirituality" do not fit, explicitly exploring hopes, worries, meaning, and changing life perspectives may be a promising alternative.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.02.001
View details for PubMedID 29428188
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC5951752
-
Pacemaker reuse in low-income/middle-income countries: moral duty or dangerous precedent?
Heart (British Cardiac Society)
2017; 103 (23): 1846-1847
View details for DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311572
View details for PubMedID 28566472
-
Controversy About Dialysis for an Adolescent.
Pediatrics
2017; 140 (1)
Abstract
For patients on dialysis, 1 frequent cause of death is their voluntary decision to discontinue dialysis. Such decisions raise complex questions when the patient is a competent adult. The decisions are even more complex when the patient is an adolescent. In this article, we present a case in which a 17-year-old adolescent decided that she no longer wished to undergo dialysis through her fistula. Her doctors thought that dialysis using any other technique would be too dangerous. Four experts in pediatric nephrology, bioethics, and palliative care discuss this decision and the different ways that the health care team might respond.
View details for DOI 10.1542/peds.2017-0327
View details for PubMedID 28759411
-
The Church, the State, and Vaccine Policy.
The American journal of bioethics : AJOB
2017; 17 (4): 50-52
View details for DOI 10.1080/15265161.2017.1284932
View details for PubMedID 28328365
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC6550300
-
The Clue.
The Hastings Center report
2017; 47 (2): 3-4
Abstract
As I stood outside of Carlos's room, I felt caught on the horns of a dilemma. It seemed impossible to truly "be there" for Carlos without sacrificing my other intern duties. This tension pervaded much of my residency training, as I often found myself spending more time completing chart notes, answering pages, and giving sign out than I did at the bedside with my patients. I knew I had a duty to "do my job"-I could not let my team down. But what about my duty to Carlos, a duty to act on my intuition and try to "get to the bottom" of his illness, if that was even possible? And what about my thirteen other patients? Wasn't I was their doctor as well? I have spent countless hours studying the ethical frameworks for medical rationing. And yet no framework could have told me how to weigh my intuition in that crucial moment of decision-making, or when it was okay to leave a few notes unfinished in order to have the time to talk with Carlos. Suddenly, I knew what I had to do.
View details for DOI 10.1002/hast.680
View details for PubMedID 28301693
-
Military Metaphors in Health Care: Who Are We Actually Trying to Help?
The American journal of bioethics : AJOB
2016; 16 (10): 15-7
View details for DOI 10.1080/15265161.2016.1214320
View details for PubMedID 27653391
-
How Should Clinicians Treat Patients Who Might Be Undocumented?
AMA journal of ethics
2016; 18 (3): 229-36
View details for DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.ecas4-1603
View details for PubMedID 27002993
-
HIV infection and obesity: where did all the wasting go?
Antiviral therapy
2012; 17 (7): 1281-9
Abstract
The success of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to dramatic changes in causes of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected individuals. As chronic diseases rates have increased in HIV+ populations, modifiable risk factors such as obesity have increased in importance. Our objective was to evaluate factors associated with weight change among patients receiving ART.ART-naïve patients initiating therapy at the University of Alabama - Birmingham 1917 HIV/AIDS Clinic from 2000- 2008 were included. Body Mass Index (BMI) was categorized as: underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9) and obese (≥30). Linear regression models were used to evaluate overall change in BMI and factors associated with increased BMI category 24 months following ART initiation.Among 681 patients, the mean baseline BMI was 25.4 ± 6.1; 44% of patients were overweight/obese. At 24 months, 20% of patients moved from normal to overweight/obese or overweight to obese BMI categories. Greater increases in BMI were observed in patients with baseline CD4 count < 50 cells/µl (3.4 ± 4.1, P<0.01) and boosted protease inhibitor use (2.5±4.1 P=0.01), but did not account for all of the variation observed in weight change.The findings that almost half of patients were overweight or obese at ART initiation, and 1 in 5 patients moved to a deleterious BMI category within 2 years of ART initiation are alarming. ART therapy provides only a modest contribution to weight gain in patients. Obesity represents a highly prevalent condition in patients with HIV infection and an important target for intervention.
View details for DOI 10.3851/IMP2348
View details for PubMedID 22951353
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC3779137