Stanford University
Showing 891-900 of 1,594 Results
-
Samuel Marks
Visiting Postdoctoral Scholar, Pediatrics - Endocrinology
BioStarting with the University of Sydney PhD (Medicine) research that created technologies to facilitate large-scale screening programs for glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy; I continued onto Harvard Medical School to work on Big Data (specifically 2TB of fundus photos); along the way gaining multi-million dollar in-kind grants from Google.
At Stanford Medical School I work both on Health Systems Engineering and technologies to improve pædiatric T1D care. -
Ann Marqueling, MD
Clinical Associate Professor, Dermatology
Clinical Associate Professor (By courtesy), PediatricsBioAnn Marqueling, M.D., is a Clinical Assistant Professor of Dermatology and Pediatrics at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital. Her clinical interests include general pediatric dermatology, neonatal dermatology, infantile hemangiomas and other vascular anomalies, acne, psoriasis, and pediatric laser and skin surgery.
-
Alison Marsden
Douglass M. and Nola Leishman Professor of Cardiovascular Diseases, Professor of Pediatrics (Cardiology) and of Bioengineering and, by courtesy, of Mechanical Engineering
Current Research and Scholarly InterestsThe Cardiovascular Biomechanics Computation Lab at Stanford develops novel computational methods for the study of cardiovascular disease progression, surgical methods, and medical devices. We have a particular interest in pediatric cardiology, and use virtual surgery to design novel surgical concepts for children born with heart defects.
-
Nicholas P. Marshall
Fellow in Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases
Staff, UIT Service Center OperationsBioI am a physician trained in Pediatric Infectious Diseases, now completing a fellowship in Clinical Informatics at Stanford, where I bring the two fields together to improve diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship. My research applies machine learning and large language models (AI) to predict infections such as bacteremia and urinary tract infections (anticipating not just whether an infection is present, but the likely organism and its susceptibility and resistance patterns) to help guide both whether to obtain a culture and which antibiotics to start. I also develop context-aware, bundled clinical decision support tools that make it easier for clinicians to order the right antimicrobial agent, dose, and duration.
-
Nicole Martinez-Martin
Assistant Professor (Research) of Pediatrics (Biomedical Ethics) and, by courtesy, of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Child Development)
Current Research and Scholarly InterestsNIH/National Institute of Mental Health
K01 MH118375-01A1
“Ethical, Legal and Social Implications in the Use of Digital Technology for Mental Health Applications”
Greenwall Foundation Making a Difference in Bioethics Grant
“Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Digital Phenotyping” -
Daphne O. Martschenko
Assistant Professor (Research) of Pediatrics (Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics)
BioDr. Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko is an Assistant Professor at the Laurie J. Girand Center for Biomedical Ethics at Stanford. Her scholarship identifies novel ways to examine and enhance the ethical and socially responsible conduct, translation, and interpretation of human genetic research.
Dr. Martschenko is passionate about fostering public and community engagement with controversial scientific research. She has appeared in the New York Times and on numerous podcasts including Freakonomics Radio. Dr. Martschenko’s work is published in publicly accessible media outlets such as Scientific American and The Conversation. In 2023, she was named one of 10 Scientists to Watch by ScienceNews.
Dr. Martschenko is author of the book What We Inherit: How New Technologies and Old Myths Are Shaping Our Genomic Future, which she wrote with friend and colleague Sam Trejo, a sociologist at Princeton University. Over the past decade, the field of human genetics has rapidly produced a wide range of never-before-seen genomic tools; together, they debate and discuss a range of social, ethical, and policy issues raised by this so-called DNA revolution. Though there’s plenty the two disagree about, they share a firm belief that—in order to successfully navigate the transition to a society where genetic prediction is increasingly accurate and available—it is vital that society take seriously the impact both of DNA and of pernicious genetic myths.
