Thomas A Wasow
Clarence Irving Lewis Professor in Philosophy and Professor of Linguistics, Emeritus and Academic Secretary to the University
2023-24 Courses
-
Independent Studies (11)
- Directed Reading
LINGUIST 397 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Directed Research
LINGUIST 398 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Dissertation Research
LINGUIST 399 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Honors Research
LINGUIST 198 (Win, Spr) - Independent Study
LINGUIST 199 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Independent Study
SYMSYS 196 (Spr) - Individual Work for Graduate Students
PHIL 240 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Individual Work, Undergraduate
PHIL 197 (Aut, Win, Spr) - M.A. Project
LINGUIST 390 (Aut, Win, Spr) - Research Projects in Linguistics
LINGUIST 396 (Win) - Tutorial, Senior Year
PHIL 196 (Aut, Win, Spr)
- Directed Reading
-
Prior Year Courses
2022-23 Courses
- Governance, Culture, and Innovation in Oxford
OSPGEN 47 (Sum) - Studying Stanford: Governance, Culture, and Innovation
SYMSYS 176S (Spr)
- Governance, Culture, and Innovation in Oxford
All Publications
-
Flexible processing and the design of grammar.
Journal of psycholinguistic research
2015; 44 (1): 47-63
Abstract
We explore the consequences of letting the incremental and integrative nature of language processing inform the design of competence grammar. What emerges is a view of grammar as a system of local monotonic constraints that provide a direct characterization of the signs (the form-meaning correspondences) of a given language. This "sign-based" conception of grammar has provided precise solutions to the key problems long thought to motivate movement-based analyses, has supported three decades of computational research developing large-scale grammar implementations, and is now beginning to play a role in computational psycholinguistics research that explores the use of underspecification in the incremental computation of partial meanings.
View details for DOI 10.1007/s10936-014-9332-4
View details for PubMedID 25385276
-
The appeal of the PDC program.
Frontiers in psychology
2013; 4: 236-?
View details for DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00236
View details for PubMedID 23637692
-
The sociolinguistics of a short-lived innovation: Tracing the development of quotative all across spoken and internet newsgroup data
LANGUAGE VARIATION AND CHANGE
2010; 22 (2): 191-219
View details for DOI 10.1017/S0954394510000098
View details for Web of Science ID 000284051600002
-
Intensive and quotative all: Something old, something new
AMERICAN SPEECH
2007; 82 (1): 3-31
View details for DOI 10.1215/00031283-2007-001
View details for Web of Science ID 000246711800001
-
Intuitions in linguistic argumentation
LINGUA
2005; 115 (11): 1481-1496
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.07.001
View details for Web of Science ID 000231722700002
-
The puzzle of ambiguity
2nd Workshop on Morphology held in Memory of Steven G Lapointe
CSLI PUBL, CTR STUDY LANGUAGE INFORMATION. 2005: 265–282
View details for Web of Science ID 000230643300012
-
Avoiding attachment ambiguities: The role of constituent ordering
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
2004; 51 (1): 55-70
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.006
View details for Web of Science ID 000221986600003
-
Domain minimization in English verb-particle constructions
LANGUAGE
2004; 80 (2): 238-261
View details for Web of Science ID 000222202600007
-
Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering
Meeting of the Linguistic-Society-of-America
LINGUISTIC SOC AMER. 2000: 28–55
View details for Web of Science ID 000086288300002
-
Repeating words in spontaneous speech
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
1998; 37 (3): 201-242
Abstract
Speakers often repeat the first word of major constituents, as in, "I uh I wouldn't be surprised at that." Repeats like this divide into four stages: an initial commitment to the constituent (with "I"); the suspension of speech; a hiatus in speaking (filled with "uh"); and a restart of the constituent ("I wouldn't."). An analysis of all repeated articles and pronouns in two large corpora of spontaneous speech shows that the four stages reflect different principles. Speakers are more likely to make a premature commitment, immediately suspending their speech, as both the local constituent and the constituent containing it become more complex. They plan some of these suspensions from the start as preliminary commitments to what they are about to say. And they are more likely to restart a constituent the more their stopping has disrupted its delivery. We argue that the principles governing these stages are general and not specific to repeats.
View details for Web of Science ID 000077736900001
View details for PubMedID 9892548
-
End-weight from the speaker's perspective
9th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing
PLENUM PUBL CORP. 1997: 347–61
View details for Web of Science ID A1997XB85400005
-
An optimality theoretic approach to variation in negative inversion in AAVE
23rd Annual Conference on New Ways of Analysing Variation
SPRINGER. 1996: 591–627
View details for Web of Science ID A1996VF67800004
-
SYNTACTIC VARIATION AND CHANGE IN PROGRESS - LOSS OF THE VERBAL CODA IN TOPIC-RESTRICTING AS FAR AS CONSTRUCTIONS
LANGUAGE
1995; 71 (1): 102-131
View details for Web of Science ID A1995RD50600003
-
IDIOMS
LANGUAGE
1994; 70 (3): 491-538
View details for Web of Science ID A1994PE76300003
-
DEBATABLE CONSTRAINTS
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
1991; 14 (4): 636-636
View details for Web of Science ID A1991GX82700051
-
WHY DEGREE-0
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
1989; 12 (2): 361-362
View details for Web of Science ID A1989U938600091
-
THE WIZARDS OF LING
NATURAL LANGUAGE & LINGUISTIC THEORY
1985; 3 (4): 485-491
View details for Web of Science ID A1985AXC9500003
-
COORDINATION AND HOW TO DISTINGUISH CATEGORIES
NATURAL LANGUAGE & LINGUISTIC THEORY
1985; 3 (2): 117-171
View details for Web of Science ID A1985AKH6800001
-
COORDINATION AND TRANSFORMATIONAL-GRAMMAR
LINGUISTIC INQUIRY
1982; 13 (4): 663-677
View details for Web of Science ID A1982PP57800004
-
CATEGORY AUX IN UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR
LINGUISTIC INQUIRY
1979; 10 (1): 1-64
View details for Web of Science ID A1979GR67600001
-
CONSTRAINING CLASS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LANGUAGES
SYNTHESE
1978; 39 (1): 81-104
View details for Web of Science ID A1978FP60600002
-
REVIEW OF CONJECTURES AND REFUTATIONS IN SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS BY BRAME,MICHAEL,K
LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS
1977; 3 (4): 377-395
View details for Web of Science ID A1977EK15400003
-
MORE ON HAVE GOT
LINGUISTIC INQUIRY
1977; 8 (4): 772-776
View details for Web of Science ID A1977EK15500018
-
TASK-SPECIFICITY AND SPECIES-SPECIFICITY IN STUDY OF LANGUAGE - METHODOLOGICAL NOTE
COGNITION
1976; 4 (2): 203-214
View details for Web of Science ID A1976BY67600006
-
MCCAWLEY ON GENERATIVE SEMANTICS - REVIEW OF GRAMMAR AND MEANING BY MCCAWLEY,JD
LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS
1976; 2 (3): 279-301
View details for Web of Science ID A1976CN58300004
-
CONSTITUENT STRUCTURE OF VP AND AUX AND POSITION OF VERB BE
LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS
1975; 1 (3): 205-245
View details for Web of Science ID A1975AS33900001
-
ANAPHORIC PRONOUNS AND BOUND VARIABLES
LANGUAGE
1975; 51 (2): 368-383
View details for Web of Science ID A1975AC73100008